Cargando…
Recovery from Different High-Intensity Interval Training Protocols: Comparing Well-Trained Women and Men
Due to physiological and anatomical sex differences, there are variations in the training response, and the recovery periods following exercise may be different. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocols are well-suited to differentially investigate the course of recovery. This study was con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9030034 |
_version_ | 1783671025474469888 |
---|---|
author | Hottenrott, Laura Möhle, Martin Ide, Alexander Ketelhut, Sascha Stoll, Oliver Hottenrott, Kuno |
author_facet | Hottenrott, Laura Möhle, Martin Ide, Alexander Ketelhut, Sascha Stoll, Oliver Hottenrott, Kuno |
author_sort | Hottenrott, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | Due to physiological and anatomical sex differences, there are variations in the training response, and the recovery periods following exercise may be different. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocols are well-suited to differentially investigate the course of recovery. This study was conducted to determine sex-specific differences in the recovery following HIIT intervals interspersed with recovery phases of different lengths. Methods: Well-trained cyclists and triathletes (n = 11 females, n = 11 males) participated in this study. There were no significant sex differences in maximal heart rate (HR), relative peak power to body mass and fat-free mass, training volume, and VO(2max)-percentiles (females: 91.8 ± 5.5 %, males: 94.6 ± 5.4 %). A 30 s Wingate test was performed four times, separated by different active recovery periods (1, 3, or 10 min). Lactate, HR, oxygen uptake, and subjective rating of exertion and recovery were determined. Results: For the recovery time of three and ten minutes, men showed significantly higher lactate concentrations (p = 0.04, p = 0.004). Contrary, HR recovery and subjective recovery were significant slower in women than in men. Conclusion: During HIIT, women may be more resistant to fatigue and have a greater ability to recover metabolically, but have a slower HR and subjective recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8000557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80005572021-03-28 Recovery from Different High-Intensity Interval Training Protocols: Comparing Well-Trained Women and Men Hottenrott, Laura Möhle, Martin Ide, Alexander Ketelhut, Sascha Stoll, Oliver Hottenrott, Kuno Sports (Basel) Article Due to physiological and anatomical sex differences, there are variations in the training response, and the recovery periods following exercise may be different. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocols are well-suited to differentially investigate the course of recovery. This study was conducted to determine sex-specific differences in the recovery following HIIT intervals interspersed with recovery phases of different lengths. Methods: Well-trained cyclists and triathletes (n = 11 females, n = 11 males) participated in this study. There were no significant sex differences in maximal heart rate (HR), relative peak power to body mass and fat-free mass, training volume, and VO(2max)-percentiles (females: 91.8 ± 5.5 %, males: 94.6 ± 5.4 %). A 30 s Wingate test was performed four times, separated by different active recovery periods (1, 3, or 10 min). Lactate, HR, oxygen uptake, and subjective rating of exertion and recovery were determined. Results: For the recovery time of three and ten minutes, men showed significantly higher lactate concentrations (p = 0.04, p = 0.004). Contrary, HR recovery and subjective recovery were significant slower in women than in men. Conclusion: During HIIT, women may be more resistant to fatigue and have a greater ability to recover metabolically, but have a slower HR and subjective recovery. MDPI 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8000557/ /pubmed/33801440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9030034 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Hottenrott, Laura Möhle, Martin Ide, Alexander Ketelhut, Sascha Stoll, Oliver Hottenrott, Kuno Recovery from Different High-Intensity Interval Training Protocols: Comparing Well-Trained Women and Men |
title | Recovery from Different High-Intensity Interval Training Protocols: Comparing Well-Trained Women and Men |
title_full | Recovery from Different High-Intensity Interval Training Protocols: Comparing Well-Trained Women and Men |
title_fullStr | Recovery from Different High-Intensity Interval Training Protocols: Comparing Well-Trained Women and Men |
title_full_unstemmed | Recovery from Different High-Intensity Interval Training Protocols: Comparing Well-Trained Women and Men |
title_short | Recovery from Different High-Intensity Interval Training Protocols: Comparing Well-Trained Women and Men |
title_sort | recovery from different high-intensity interval training protocols: comparing well-trained women and men |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports9030034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hottenrottlaura recoveryfromdifferenthighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolscomparingwelltrainedwomenandmen AT mohlemartin recoveryfromdifferenthighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolscomparingwelltrainedwomenandmen AT idealexander recoveryfromdifferenthighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolscomparingwelltrainedwomenandmen AT ketelhutsascha recoveryfromdifferenthighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolscomparingwelltrainedwomenandmen AT stolloliver recoveryfromdifferenthighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolscomparingwelltrainedwomenandmen AT hottenrottkuno recoveryfromdifferenthighintensityintervaltrainingprotocolscomparingwelltrainedwomenandmen |