Cargando…
Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders
The Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index (HCDI) is a simple and quick test used to evaluate subjects affected by temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and its psychometric properties have not been tested. The test evaluates movement, joint function, pain and musculature, providing a quick general overvi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030472 |
_version_ | 1783671083278270464 |
---|---|
author | Alonso-Royo, Roger Sánchez-Torrelo, Carmen María Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier Zagalaz-Anula, Noelia Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel Lomas-Vega, Rafael |
author_facet | Alonso-Royo, Roger Sánchez-Torrelo, Carmen María Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier Zagalaz-Anula, Noelia Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel Lomas-Vega, Rafael |
author_sort | Alonso-Royo, Roger |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index (HCDI) is a simple and quick test used to evaluate subjects affected by temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and its psychometric properties have not been tested. The test evaluates movement, joint function, pain and musculature, providing a quick general overview that could be very useful at different levels of care. For this reason, the aim of this study was to validate the use of the HCDI in a sample of patients with TMD. Methods: The sample consisted of 107 subjects, 60 TMD patients and 47 healthy controls. The study evaluated concurrent validity, inter-rater concordance and predictive values. Results: The HCDI showed moderate to substantial inter-rater concordance among the items and excellent concordance for the total scores. The correlation with other TMD assessment tests was high, the correlation with dizziness was moderate and the correlation with neck pain, headache and overall quality of life was poor. The prediction of TMD showed a sensitivity of 86.67%, a specificity of 68.09% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.841. Conclusions: The HCDI is a valid and reliable assessment instrument; its clinimetric properties are adequate, and it has a good ability to discriminate between TMD-affected and TMD-unaffected subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8000811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80008112021-03-28 Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders Alonso-Royo, Roger Sánchez-Torrelo, Carmen María Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier Zagalaz-Anula, Noelia Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel Lomas-Vega, Rafael Diagnostics (Basel) Article The Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index (HCDI) is a simple and quick test used to evaluate subjects affected by temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and its psychometric properties have not been tested. The test evaluates movement, joint function, pain and musculature, providing a quick general overview that could be very useful at different levels of care. For this reason, the aim of this study was to validate the use of the HCDI in a sample of patients with TMD. Methods: The sample consisted of 107 subjects, 60 TMD patients and 47 healthy controls. The study evaluated concurrent validity, inter-rater concordance and predictive values. Results: The HCDI showed moderate to substantial inter-rater concordance among the items and excellent concordance for the total scores. The correlation with other TMD assessment tests was high, the correlation with dizziness was moderate and the correlation with neck pain, headache and overall quality of life was poor. The prediction of TMD showed a sensitivity of 86.67%, a specificity of 68.09% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.841. Conclusions: The HCDI is a valid and reliable assessment instrument; its clinimetric properties are adequate, and it has a good ability to discriminate between TMD-affected and TMD-unaffected subjects. MDPI 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8000811/ /pubmed/33800185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030472 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Alonso-Royo, Roger Sánchez-Torrelo, Carmen María Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier Zagalaz-Anula, Noelia Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel Lomas-Vega, Rafael Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders |
title | Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders |
title_full | Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders |
title_fullStr | Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders |
title_short | Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders |
title_sort | validity and reliability of the helkimo clinical dysfunction index for the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alonsoroyoroger validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders AT sancheztorrelocarmenmaria validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders AT ibanezveraalfonsojavier validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders AT zagalazanulanoelia validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders AT castellotecaballeroyolanda validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders AT obrerogaitanesteban validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders AT rodriguezalmagrodaniel validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders AT lomasvegarafael validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders |