Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders

The Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index (HCDI) is a simple and quick test used to evaluate subjects affected by temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and its psychometric properties have not been tested. The test evaluates movement, joint function, pain and musculature, providing a quick general overvi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alonso-Royo, Roger, Sánchez-Torrelo, Carmen María, Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier, Zagalaz-Anula, Noelia, Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda, Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban, Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel, Lomas-Vega, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030472
_version_ 1783671083278270464
author Alonso-Royo, Roger
Sánchez-Torrelo, Carmen María
Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier
Zagalaz-Anula, Noelia
Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda
Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban
Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel
Lomas-Vega, Rafael
author_facet Alonso-Royo, Roger
Sánchez-Torrelo, Carmen María
Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier
Zagalaz-Anula, Noelia
Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda
Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban
Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel
Lomas-Vega, Rafael
author_sort Alonso-Royo, Roger
collection PubMed
description The Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index (HCDI) is a simple and quick test used to evaluate subjects affected by temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and its psychometric properties have not been tested. The test evaluates movement, joint function, pain and musculature, providing a quick general overview that could be very useful at different levels of care. For this reason, the aim of this study was to validate the use of the HCDI in a sample of patients with TMD. Methods: The sample consisted of 107 subjects, 60 TMD patients and 47 healthy controls. The study evaluated concurrent validity, inter-rater concordance and predictive values. Results: The HCDI showed moderate to substantial inter-rater concordance among the items and excellent concordance for the total scores. The correlation with other TMD assessment tests was high, the correlation with dizziness was moderate and the correlation with neck pain, headache and overall quality of life was poor. The prediction of TMD showed a sensitivity of 86.67%, a specificity of 68.09% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.841. Conclusions: The HCDI is a valid and reliable assessment instrument; its clinimetric properties are adequate, and it has a good ability to discriminate between TMD-affected and TMD-unaffected subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8000811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80008112021-03-28 Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders Alonso-Royo, Roger Sánchez-Torrelo, Carmen María Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier Zagalaz-Anula, Noelia Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel Lomas-Vega, Rafael Diagnostics (Basel) Article The Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index (HCDI) is a simple and quick test used to evaluate subjects affected by temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and its psychometric properties have not been tested. The test evaluates movement, joint function, pain and musculature, providing a quick general overview that could be very useful at different levels of care. For this reason, the aim of this study was to validate the use of the HCDI in a sample of patients with TMD. Methods: The sample consisted of 107 subjects, 60 TMD patients and 47 healthy controls. The study evaluated concurrent validity, inter-rater concordance and predictive values. Results: The HCDI showed moderate to substantial inter-rater concordance among the items and excellent concordance for the total scores. The correlation with other TMD assessment tests was high, the correlation with dizziness was moderate and the correlation with neck pain, headache and overall quality of life was poor. The prediction of TMD showed a sensitivity of 86.67%, a specificity of 68.09% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.841. Conclusions: The HCDI is a valid and reliable assessment instrument; its clinimetric properties are adequate, and it has a good ability to discriminate between TMD-affected and TMD-unaffected subjects. MDPI 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8000811/ /pubmed/33800185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030472 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Alonso-Royo, Roger
Sánchez-Torrelo, Carmen María
Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier
Zagalaz-Anula, Noelia
Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda
Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban
Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel
Lomas-Vega, Rafael
Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders
title Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders
title_full Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders
title_short Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders
title_sort validity and reliability of the helkimo clinical dysfunction index for the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030472
work_keys_str_mv AT alonsoroyoroger validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders
AT sancheztorrelocarmenmaria validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders
AT ibanezveraalfonsojavier validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders
AT zagalazanulanoelia validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders
AT castellotecaballeroyolanda validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders
AT obrerogaitanesteban validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders
AT rodriguezalmagrodaniel validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders
AT lomasvegarafael validityandreliabilityofthehelkimoclinicaldysfunctionindexforthediagnosisoftemporomandibulardisorders