Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of the Differences in Dentofacial Morphology According to the Tongue and Lip Pressure

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the tongue and lip pressure on dentofacial morphology. The subjects comprised 194 patients with malocclusion. Anterior and posterior tongue elevation and lip pressures were evaluated using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) device. The la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Yoo-Sun, Ryu, Jiho, Baek, Seung-Hak, Lim, Won Hee, Yang, Il-Hyung, Kim, Tae-Woo, Jung, Seok-Ki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33809088
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030503
_version_ 1783671089314922496
author Lee, Yoo-Sun
Ryu, Jiho
Baek, Seung-Hak
Lim, Won Hee
Yang, Il-Hyung
Kim, Tae-Woo
Jung, Seok-Ki
author_facet Lee, Yoo-Sun
Ryu, Jiho
Baek, Seung-Hak
Lim, Won Hee
Yang, Il-Hyung
Kim, Tae-Woo
Jung, Seok-Ki
author_sort Lee, Yoo-Sun
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the tongue and lip pressure on dentofacial morphology. The subjects comprised 194 patients with malocclusion. Anterior and posterior tongue elevation and lip pressures were evaluated using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) device. The lateral cephalograms of each subject were traced and digitized to perform the analysis. Statistical analysis was used to investigate the relationship between perioral muscle force and the cephalometric variables. Anterior and posterior tongue pressure was both higher in males than in females. No sex difference in lip pressure was observed. The group with a low posterior tongue pressure showed a short ramus height, short posterior facial height, and clockwise-rotated mandible. On the other hand, lip pressure had a significant influence on maxillary incisor angulation. Skeletal pattern was not found to be significantly related with lip pressure. The anterior tongue pressure appeared as a mixed pattern of the two results. Tongue pressure was related to skeletal measurements, such as short posterior facial height, and lip pressure was related to the angulation of the anterior teeth. This study suggests that there may be differences in dentofacial morphology according to the differences in perioral muscle force.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8000836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80008362021-03-28 Comparative Analysis of the Differences in Dentofacial Morphology According to the Tongue and Lip Pressure Lee, Yoo-Sun Ryu, Jiho Baek, Seung-Hak Lim, Won Hee Yang, Il-Hyung Kim, Tae-Woo Jung, Seok-Ki Diagnostics (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the tongue and lip pressure on dentofacial morphology. The subjects comprised 194 patients with malocclusion. Anterior and posterior tongue elevation and lip pressures were evaluated using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) device. The lateral cephalograms of each subject were traced and digitized to perform the analysis. Statistical analysis was used to investigate the relationship between perioral muscle force and the cephalometric variables. Anterior and posterior tongue pressure was both higher in males than in females. No sex difference in lip pressure was observed. The group with a low posterior tongue pressure showed a short ramus height, short posterior facial height, and clockwise-rotated mandible. On the other hand, lip pressure had a significant influence on maxillary incisor angulation. Skeletal pattern was not found to be significantly related with lip pressure. The anterior tongue pressure appeared as a mixed pattern of the two results. Tongue pressure was related to skeletal measurements, such as short posterior facial height, and lip pressure was related to the angulation of the anterior teeth. This study suggests that there may be differences in dentofacial morphology according to the differences in perioral muscle force. MDPI 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8000836/ /pubmed/33809088 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030503 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Yoo-Sun
Ryu, Jiho
Baek, Seung-Hak
Lim, Won Hee
Yang, Il-Hyung
Kim, Tae-Woo
Jung, Seok-Ki
Comparative Analysis of the Differences in Dentofacial Morphology According to the Tongue and Lip Pressure
title Comparative Analysis of the Differences in Dentofacial Morphology According to the Tongue and Lip Pressure
title_full Comparative Analysis of the Differences in Dentofacial Morphology According to the Tongue and Lip Pressure
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the Differences in Dentofacial Morphology According to the Tongue and Lip Pressure
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the Differences in Dentofacial Morphology According to the Tongue and Lip Pressure
title_short Comparative Analysis of the Differences in Dentofacial Morphology According to the Tongue and Lip Pressure
title_sort comparative analysis of the differences in dentofacial morphology according to the tongue and lip pressure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33809088
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030503
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyoosun comparativeanalysisofthedifferencesindentofacialmorphologyaccordingtothetongueandlippressure
AT ryujiho comparativeanalysisofthedifferencesindentofacialmorphologyaccordingtothetongueandlippressure
AT baekseunghak comparativeanalysisofthedifferencesindentofacialmorphologyaccordingtothetongueandlippressure
AT limwonhee comparativeanalysisofthedifferencesindentofacialmorphologyaccordingtothetongueandlippressure
AT yangilhyung comparativeanalysisofthedifferencesindentofacialmorphologyaccordingtothetongueandlippressure
AT kimtaewoo comparativeanalysisofthedifferencesindentofacialmorphologyaccordingtothetongueandlippressure
AT jungseokki comparativeanalysisofthedifferencesindentofacialmorphologyaccordingtothetongueandlippressure