Cargando…

The Use and Impact of Cognitive Enhancers among University Students: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Cognitive enhancers (CEs), also known as “smart drugs”, “study aids” or “nootropics” are a cause of concern. Recent research studies investigated the use of CEs being taken as study aids by university students. This manuscript provides an overview of popular CEs, focusing on a range of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharif, Safia, Guirguis, Amira, Fergus, Suzanne, Schifano, Fabrizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030355
_version_ 1783671089789927424
author Sharif, Safia
Guirguis, Amira
Fergus, Suzanne
Schifano, Fabrizio
author_facet Sharif, Safia
Guirguis, Amira
Fergus, Suzanne
Schifano, Fabrizio
author_sort Sharif, Safia
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Cognitive enhancers (CEs), also known as “smart drugs”, “study aids” or “nootropics” are a cause of concern. Recent research studies investigated the use of CEs being taken as study aids by university students. This manuscript provides an overview of popular CEs, focusing on a range of drugs/substances (e.g., prescription CEs including amphetamine salt mixtures, methylphenidate, modafinil and piracetam; and non-prescription CEs including caffeine, cobalamin (vitamin B12), guarana, pyridoxine (vitamin B6) and vinpocetine) that have emerged as being misused. The diverted non-prescription use of these molecules and the related potential for dependence and/or addiction is being reported. It has been demonstrated that healthy students (i.e., those without any diagnosed mental disorders) are increasingly using drugs such as methylphenidate, a mixture of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine, and modafinil, for the purpose of increasing their alertness, concentration or memory. Aim: To investigate the level of knowledge, perception and impact of the use of a range of CEs within Higher Education Institutions. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Whilst 1400 studies were identified within this study through a variety of electronic databases (e.g., 520 through PubMed, 490 through Science Direct and 390 through Scopus), 48 papers were deemed relevant and were included in this review. Results: The most popular molecules identified here included the stimulant CEs, e.g., methylphenidate, modafinil, amphetamine salt mixtures and caffeine-related compounds; stimulant CEs’ intake was more prevalent among males than females; drugs were largely obtained from friends and family, as well as via the Internet. It is therefore suggested that CEs are increasingly being used among healthy individuals, mainly students without any diagnosed cognitive disorders, to increase their alertness, concentration, or memory, in the belief that these CEs will improve their performance during examinations or when studying. The impact of stimulant CEs may include tolerance, dependence and/or somatic (e.g., cardiovascular; neurological) complications. Discussion: The availability of CEs for non-medical indications in different countries is influenced by a range of factors including legal, social and ethical factors. Considering the risk factors and motivations that encourage university students to use CE drugs, it is essential to raise awareness about CE-related harms, counteract myths regarding “safe” CE use and address cognitive enhancement in an early stage during education as a preventative public health measure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8000838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80008382021-03-28 The Use and Impact of Cognitive Enhancers among University Students: A Systematic Review Sharif, Safia Guirguis, Amira Fergus, Suzanne Schifano, Fabrizio Brain Sci Systematic Review Introduction: Cognitive enhancers (CEs), also known as “smart drugs”, “study aids” or “nootropics” are a cause of concern. Recent research studies investigated the use of CEs being taken as study aids by university students. This manuscript provides an overview of popular CEs, focusing on a range of drugs/substances (e.g., prescription CEs including amphetamine salt mixtures, methylphenidate, modafinil and piracetam; and non-prescription CEs including caffeine, cobalamin (vitamin B12), guarana, pyridoxine (vitamin B6) and vinpocetine) that have emerged as being misused. The diverted non-prescription use of these molecules and the related potential for dependence and/or addiction is being reported. It has been demonstrated that healthy students (i.e., those without any diagnosed mental disorders) are increasingly using drugs such as methylphenidate, a mixture of dextroamphetamine/amphetamine, and modafinil, for the purpose of increasing their alertness, concentration or memory. Aim: To investigate the level of knowledge, perception and impact of the use of a range of CEs within Higher Education Institutions. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Whilst 1400 studies were identified within this study through a variety of electronic databases (e.g., 520 through PubMed, 490 through Science Direct and 390 through Scopus), 48 papers were deemed relevant and were included in this review. Results: The most popular molecules identified here included the stimulant CEs, e.g., methylphenidate, modafinil, amphetamine salt mixtures and caffeine-related compounds; stimulant CEs’ intake was more prevalent among males than females; drugs were largely obtained from friends and family, as well as via the Internet. It is therefore suggested that CEs are increasingly being used among healthy individuals, mainly students without any diagnosed cognitive disorders, to increase their alertness, concentration, or memory, in the belief that these CEs will improve their performance during examinations or when studying. The impact of stimulant CEs may include tolerance, dependence and/or somatic (e.g., cardiovascular; neurological) complications. Discussion: The availability of CEs for non-medical indications in different countries is influenced by a range of factors including legal, social and ethical factors. Considering the risk factors and motivations that encourage university students to use CE drugs, it is essential to raise awareness about CE-related harms, counteract myths regarding “safe” CE use and address cognitive enhancement in an early stage during education as a preventative public health measure. MDPI 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8000838/ /pubmed/33802176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030355 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Sharif, Safia
Guirguis, Amira
Fergus, Suzanne
Schifano, Fabrizio
The Use and Impact of Cognitive Enhancers among University Students: A Systematic Review
title The Use and Impact of Cognitive Enhancers among University Students: A Systematic Review
title_full The Use and Impact of Cognitive Enhancers among University Students: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Use and Impact of Cognitive Enhancers among University Students: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Use and Impact of Cognitive Enhancers among University Students: A Systematic Review
title_short The Use and Impact of Cognitive Enhancers among University Students: A Systematic Review
title_sort use and impact of cognitive enhancers among university students: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030355
work_keys_str_mv AT sharifsafia theuseandimpactofcognitiveenhancersamonguniversitystudentsasystematicreview
AT guirguisamira theuseandimpactofcognitiveenhancersamonguniversitystudentsasystematicreview
AT fergussuzanne theuseandimpactofcognitiveenhancersamonguniversitystudentsasystematicreview
AT schifanofabrizio theuseandimpactofcognitiveenhancersamonguniversitystudentsasystematicreview
AT sharifsafia useandimpactofcognitiveenhancersamonguniversitystudentsasystematicreview
AT guirguisamira useandimpactofcognitiveenhancersamonguniversitystudentsasystematicreview
AT fergussuzanne useandimpactofcognitiveenhancersamonguniversitystudentsasystematicreview
AT schifanofabrizio useandimpactofcognitiveenhancersamonguniversitystudentsasystematicreview