Cargando…
Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA
Background: Bacteroides fragilis shows high antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates and possesses numerous AMR mechanisms. Its carbapenem-resistant strains (metallo-β-lactamase cfiA-positive) appear as an emergent, evolving clade. Methods: This work examines the genomes, taxonomy, and phylogenetic rela...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33809460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030304 |
_version_ | 1783671143940489216 |
---|---|
author | Valdezate, Sylvia Cobo, Fernando Monzón, Sara Medina-Pascual, María J. Zaballos, Ángel Cuesta, Isabel Pino-Rosa, Silvia Villalón, Pilar |
author_facet | Valdezate, Sylvia Cobo, Fernando Monzón, Sara Medina-Pascual, María J. Zaballos, Ángel Cuesta, Isabel Pino-Rosa, Silvia Villalón, Pilar |
author_sort | Valdezate, Sylvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Bacteroides fragilis shows high antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates and possesses numerous AMR mechanisms. Its carbapenem-resistant strains (metallo-β-lactamase cfiA-positive) appear as an emergent, evolving clade. Methods: This work examines the genomes, taxonomy, and phylogenetic relationships with respect to other B. fragilis genomes of two B. fragilis strains (CNM20180471 and CNM20200206) resistant to meropenem+EDTA and other antimicrobial agents. Results: Both strains possessed cfiA genes (cfiA14b and the new cfiA28), along with other AMR mechanisms. The presence of other efflux-pump genes, mexAB/mexJK/mexXY-oprM, acrEF/mdtEF-tolC, and especially cusR, which reduces the entry of carbapenem via the repression of porin OprD, may be related to meropenem–EDTA resistance. None of the detected insertion sequences were located upstream of cfiA. The genomes of these and other B. fragilis strains that clustered together in phylogenetic analyses did not meet the condition of >95% average nucleotide/amino acid identity, or >70% in silico genome-to-genome hybridization similarity, to be deemed members of the same species, although <1% difference in the genomic G+C content was seen with respect to the reference genome B. fragilis NCTC 9343T. Conclusions: Carbapenem-resistant strains may be considered a distinct clonal entity, and their surveillance is recommended given the ease with which they appear to acquire AMR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8001070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80010702021-03-28 Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA Valdezate, Sylvia Cobo, Fernando Monzón, Sara Medina-Pascual, María J. Zaballos, Ángel Cuesta, Isabel Pino-Rosa, Silvia Villalón, Pilar Antibiotics (Basel) Article Background: Bacteroides fragilis shows high antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates and possesses numerous AMR mechanisms. Its carbapenem-resistant strains (metallo-β-lactamase cfiA-positive) appear as an emergent, evolving clade. Methods: This work examines the genomes, taxonomy, and phylogenetic relationships with respect to other B. fragilis genomes of two B. fragilis strains (CNM20180471 and CNM20200206) resistant to meropenem+EDTA and other antimicrobial agents. Results: Both strains possessed cfiA genes (cfiA14b and the new cfiA28), along with other AMR mechanisms. The presence of other efflux-pump genes, mexAB/mexJK/mexXY-oprM, acrEF/mdtEF-tolC, and especially cusR, which reduces the entry of carbapenem via the repression of porin OprD, may be related to meropenem–EDTA resistance. None of the detected insertion sequences were located upstream of cfiA. The genomes of these and other B. fragilis strains that clustered together in phylogenetic analyses did not meet the condition of >95% average nucleotide/amino acid identity, or >70% in silico genome-to-genome hybridization similarity, to be deemed members of the same species, although <1% difference in the genomic G+C content was seen with respect to the reference genome B. fragilis NCTC 9343T. Conclusions: Carbapenem-resistant strains may be considered a distinct clonal entity, and their surveillance is recommended given the ease with which they appear to acquire AMR. MDPI 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8001070/ /pubmed/33809460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030304 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Valdezate, Sylvia Cobo, Fernando Monzón, Sara Medina-Pascual, María J. Zaballos, Ángel Cuesta, Isabel Pino-Rosa, Silvia Villalón, Pilar Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA |
title | Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA |
title_full | Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA |
title_fullStr | Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA |
title_full_unstemmed | Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA |
title_short | Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA |
title_sort | genomic background and phylogeny of cfia-positive bacteroides fragilis strains resistant to meropenem-edta |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33809460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030304 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valdezatesylvia genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta AT cobofernando genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta AT monzonsara genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta AT medinapascualmariaj genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta AT zaballosangel genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta AT cuestaisabel genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta AT pinorosasilvia genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta AT villalonpilar genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta |