Cargando…

Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA

Background: Bacteroides fragilis shows high antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates and possesses numerous AMR mechanisms. Its carbapenem-resistant strains (metallo-β-lactamase cfiA-positive) appear as an emergent, evolving clade. Methods: This work examines the genomes, taxonomy, and phylogenetic rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valdezate, Sylvia, Cobo, Fernando, Monzón, Sara, Medina-Pascual, María J., Zaballos, Ángel, Cuesta, Isabel, Pino-Rosa, Silvia, Villalón, Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33809460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030304
_version_ 1783671143940489216
author Valdezate, Sylvia
Cobo, Fernando
Monzón, Sara
Medina-Pascual, María J.
Zaballos, Ángel
Cuesta, Isabel
Pino-Rosa, Silvia
Villalón, Pilar
author_facet Valdezate, Sylvia
Cobo, Fernando
Monzón, Sara
Medina-Pascual, María J.
Zaballos, Ángel
Cuesta, Isabel
Pino-Rosa, Silvia
Villalón, Pilar
author_sort Valdezate, Sylvia
collection PubMed
description Background: Bacteroides fragilis shows high antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates and possesses numerous AMR mechanisms. Its carbapenem-resistant strains (metallo-β-lactamase cfiA-positive) appear as an emergent, evolving clade. Methods: This work examines the genomes, taxonomy, and phylogenetic relationships with respect to other B. fragilis genomes of two B. fragilis strains (CNM20180471 and CNM20200206) resistant to meropenem+EDTA and other antimicrobial agents. Results: Both strains possessed cfiA genes (cfiA14b and the new cfiA28), along with other AMR mechanisms. The presence of other efflux-pump genes, mexAB/mexJK/mexXY-oprM, acrEF/mdtEF-tolC, and especially cusR, which reduces the entry of carbapenem via the repression of porin OprD, may be related to meropenem–EDTA resistance. None of the detected insertion sequences were located upstream of cfiA. The genomes of these and other B. fragilis strains that clustered together in phylogenetic analyses did not meet the condition of >95% average nucleotide/amino acid identity, or >70% in silico genome-to-genome hybridization similarity, to be deemed members of the same species, although <1% difference in the genomic G+C content was seen with respect to the reference genome B. fragilis NCTC 9343T. Conclusions: Carbapenem-resistant strains may be considered a distinct clonal entity, and their surveillance is recommended given the ease with which they appear to acquire AMR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8001070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80010702021-03-28 Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA Valdezate, Sylvia Cobo, Fernando Monzón, Sara Medina-Pascual, María J. Zaballos, Ángel Cuesta, Isabel Pino-Rosa, Silvia Villalón, Pilar Antibiotics (Basel) Article Background: Bacteroides fragilis shows high antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates and possesses numerous AMR mechanisms. Its carbapenem-resistant strains (metallo-β-lactamase cfiA-positive) appear as an emergent, evolving clade. Methods: This work examines the genomes, taxonomy, and phylogenetic relationships with respect to other B. fragilis genomes of two B. fragilis strains (CNM20180471 and CNM20200206) resistant to meropenem+EDTA and other antimicrobial agents. Results: Both strains possessed cfiA genes (cfiA14b and the new cfiA28), along with other AMR mechanisms. The presence of other efflux-pump genes, mexAB/mexJK/mexXY-oprM, acrEF/mdtEF-tolC, and especially cusR, which reduces the entry of carbapenem via the repression of porin OprD, may be related to meropenem–EDTA resistance. None of the detected insertion sequences were located upstream of cfiA. The genomes of these and other B. fragilis strains that clustered together in phylogenetic analyses did not meet the condition of >95% average nucleotide/amino acid identity, or >70% in silico genome-to-genome hybridization similarity, to be deemed members of the same species, although <1% difference in the genomic G+C content was seen with respect to the reference genome B. fragilis NCTC 9343T. Conclusions: Carbapenem-resistant strains may be considered a distinct clonal entity, and their surveillance is recommended given the ease with which they appear to acquire AMR. MDPI 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8001070/ /pubmed/33809460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030304 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Valdezate, Sylvia
Cobo, Fernando
Monzón, Sara
Medina-Pascual, María J.
Zaballos, Ángel
Cuesta, Isabel
Pino-Rosa, Silvia
Villalón, Pilar
Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA
title Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA
title_full Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA
title_fullStr Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA
title_full_unstemmed Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA
title_short Genomic Background and Phylogeny of cfiA-Positive Bacteroides fragilis Strains Resistant to Meropenem-EDTA
title_sort genomic background and phylogeny of cfia-positive bacteroides fragilis strains resistant to meropenem-edta
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33809460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030304
work_keys_str_mv AT valdezatesylvia genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta
AT cobofernando genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta
AT monzonsara genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta
AT medinapascualmariaj genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta
AT zaballosangel genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta
AT cuestaisabel genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta
AT pinorosasilvia genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta
AT villalonpilar genomicbackgroundandphylogenyofcfiapositivebacteroidesfragilisstrainsresistanttomeropenemedta