Cargando…
Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia
Background and Objectives: The potential role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in characterizing lung involvement in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still debated. The aim of the study was to estimate sensitivity of admission LUS for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 lung involvement using Chest-CT (Comput...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030236 |
_version_ | 1783671159646060544 |
---|---|
author | Quarato, Carla Maria Irene Mirijello, Antonio Lacedonia, Donato Russo, Raffaele Maggi, Michele Maria Rea, Gaetano Simeone, Annalisa Borelli, Cristina Feragalli, Beatrice Scioscia, Giulia Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino Massa, Valentina De Cosmo, Salvatore Sperandeo, Marco |
author_facet | Quarato, Carla Maria Irene Mirijello, Antonio Lacedonia, Donato Russo, Raffaele Maggi, Michele Maria Rea, Gaetano Simeone, Annalisa Borelli, Cristina Feragalli, Beatrice Scioscia, Giulia Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino Massa, Valentina De Cosmo, Salvatore Sperandeo, Marco |
author_sort | Quarato, Carla Maria Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: The potential role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in characterizing lung involvement in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still debated. The aim of the study was to estimate sensitivity of admission LUS for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 lung involvement using Chest-CT (Computed Tomography) as reference standard in order to assess LUS usefulness in ruling out COVID-19 pneumonia in the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: Eighty-two patients with confirmed COVID-19 and signs of lung involvement on Chest-CT were consecutively admitted to our hospital and recruited in the study. Chest-CT and LUS examination were concurrently performed within the first 6–12h from admission. Sensitivity of LUS was calculated using CT findings as a reference standard. Results: Global LUS sensitivity in detecting COVID-19 pulmonary lesions was 52%. LUS sensitivity ranged from 8% in case of focal and sporadic ground-glass opacities (mild disease), to 52% for a crazy-paving pattern (moderate disease) and up to 100% in case of extensive subpleural consolidations (severe disease), although LUS was not always able to detect all the consolidations assessed at Chest-CT. LUS sensitivity was higher in detecting a typical Chest-CT pattern (60%) and abnormalities showing a middle-lower zone predominance (79%). Conclusions: As admission LUS may result falsely negative in most cases, it should not be considered as a reliable imaging tool in ruling out COVID-19 pneumonia in patients presenting in ED. It may at least represent an expanded clinical evaluation that needs integration with other diagnostic tests (e.g., nasopharyngeal swab, Chest-CT). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8001137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80011372021-03-28 Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Quarato, Carla Maria Irene Mirijello, Antonio Lacedonia, Donato Russo, Raffaele Maggi, Michele Maria Rea, Gaetano Simeone, Annalisa Borelli, Cristina Feragalli, Beatrice Scioscia, Giulia Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino Massa, Valentina De Cosmo, Salvatore Sperandeo, Marco Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: The potential role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in characterizing lung involvement in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still debated. The aim of the study was to estimate sensitivity of admission LUS for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 lung involvement using Chest-CT (Computed Tomography) as reference standard in order to assess LUS usefulness in ruling out COVID-19 pneumonia in the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: Eighty-two patients with confirmed COVID-19 and signs of lung involvement on Chest-CT were consecutively admitted to our hospital and recruited in the study. Chest-CT and LUS examination were concurrently performed within the first 6–12h from admission. Sensitivity of LUS was calculated using CT findings as a reference standard. Results: Global LUS sensitivity in detecting COVID-19 pulmonary lesions was 52%. LUS sensitivity ranged from 8% in case of focal and sporadic ground-glass opacities (mild disease), to 52% for a crazy-paving pattern (moderate disease) and up to 100% in case of extensive subpleural consolidations (severe disease), although LUS was not always able to detect all the consolidations assessed at Chest-CT. LUS sensitivity was higher in detecting a typical Chest-CT pattern (60%) and abnormalities showing a middle-lower zone predominance (79%). Conclusions: As admission LUS may result falsely negative in most cases, it should not be considered as a reliable imaging tool in ruling out COVID-19 pneumonia in patients presenting in ED. It may at least represent an expanded clinical evaluation that needs integration with other diagnostic tests (e.g., nasopharyngeal swab, Chest-CT). MDPI 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8001137/ /pubmed/33806432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030236 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Quarato, Carla Maria Irene Mirijello, Antonio Lacedonia, Donato Russo, Raffaele Maggi, Michele Maria Rea, Gaetano Simeone, Annalisa Borelli, Cristina Feragalli, Beatrice Scioscia, Giulia Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino Massa, Valentina De Cosmo, Salvatore Sperandeo, Marco Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia |
title | Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia |
title_full | Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia |
title_fullStr | Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia |
title_short | Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia |
title_sort | low sensitivity of admission lung us compared to chest ct for diagnosis of lung involvement in a cohort of 82 patients with covid-19 pneumonia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030236 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quaratocarlamariairene lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT mirijelloantonio lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT lacedoniadonato lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT russoraffaele lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT maggimichelemaria lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT reagaetano lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT simeoneannalisa lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT borellicristina lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT feragallibeatrice lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT sciosciagiulia lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT barbaromariapiafoschino lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT massavalentina lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT decosmosalvatore lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia AT sperandeomarco lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia |