Cargando…

Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

Background and Objectives: The potential role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in characterizing lung involvement in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still debated. The aim of the study was to estimate sensitivity of admission LUS for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 lung involvement using Chest-CT (Comput...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quarato, Carla Maria Irene, Mirijello, Antonio, Lacedonia, Donato, Russo, Raffaele, Maggi, Michele Maria, Rea, Gaetano, Simeone, Annalisa, Borelli, Cristina, Feragalli, Beatrice, Scioscia, Giulia, Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino, Massa, Valentina, De Cosmo, Salvatore, Sperandeo, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030236
_version_ 1783671159646060544
author Quarato, Carla Maria Irene
Mirijello, Antonio
Lacedonia, Donato
Russo, Raffaele
Maggi, Michele Maria
Rea, Gaetano
Simeone, Annalisa
Borelli, Cristina
Feragalli, Beatrice
Scioscia, Giulia
Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino
Massa, Valentina
De Cosmo, Salvatore
Sperandeo, Marco
author_facet Quarato, Carla Maria Irene
Mirijello, Antonio
Lacedonia, Donato
Russo, Raffaele
Maggi, Michele Maria
Rea, Gaetano
Simeone, Annalisa
Borelli, Cristina
Feragalli, Beatrice
Scioscia, Giulia
Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino
Massa, Valentina
De Cosmo, Salvatore
Sperandeo, Marco
author_sort Quarato, Carla Maria Irene
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: The potential role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in characterizing lung involvement in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still debated. The aim of the study was to estimate sensitivity of admission LUS for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 lung involvement using Chest-CT (Computed Tomography) as reference standard in order to assess LUS usefulness in ruling out COVID-19 pneumonia in the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: Eighty-two patients with confirmed COVID-19 and signs of lung involvement on Chest-CT were consecutively admitted to our hospital and recruited in the study. Chest-CT and LUS examination were concurrently performed within the first 6–12h from admission. Sensitivity of LUS was calculated using CT findings as a reference standard. Results: Global LUS sensitivity in detecting COVID-19 pulmonary lesions was 52%. LUS sensitivity ranged from 8% in case of focal and sporadic ground-glass opacities (mild disease), to 52% for a crazy-paving pattern (moderate disease) and up to 100% in case of extensive subpleural consolidations (severe disease), although LUS was not always able to detect all the consolidations assessed at Chest-CT. LUS sensitivity was higher in detecting a typical Chest-CT pattern (60%) and abnormalities showing a middle-lower zone predominance (79%). Conclusions: As admission LUS may result falsely negative in most cases, it should not be considered as a reliable imaging tool in ruling out COVID-19 pneumonia in patients presenting in ED. It may at least represent an expanded clinical evaluation that needs integration with other diagnostic tests (e.g., nasopharyngeal swab, Chest-CT).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8001137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80011372021-03-28 Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Quarato, Carla Maria Irene Mirijello, Antonio Lacedonia, Donato Russo, Raffaele Maggi, Michele Maria Rea, Gaetano Simeone, Annalisa Borelli, Cristina Feragalli, Beatrice Scioscia, Giulia Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino Massa, Valentina De Cosmo, Salvatore Sperandeo, Marco Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: The potential role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in characterizing lung involvement in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still debated. The aim of the study was to estimate sensitivity of admission LUS for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 lung involvement using Chest-CT (Computed Tomography) as reference standard in order to assess LUS usefulness in ruling out COVID-19 pneumonia in the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: Eighty-two patients with confirmed COVID-19 and signs of lung involvement on Chest-CT were consecutively admitted to our hospital and recruited in the study. Chest-CT and LUS examination were concurrently performed within the first 6–12h from admission. Sensitivity of LUS was calculated using CT findings as a reference standard. Results: Global LUS sensitivity in detecting COVID-19 pulmonary lesions was 52%. LUS sensitivity ranged from 8% in case of focal and sporadic ground-glass opacities (mild disease), to 52% for a crazy-paving pattern (moderate disease) and up to 100% in case of extensive subpleural consolidations (severe disease), although LUS was not always able to detect all the consolidations assessed at Chest-CT. LUS sensitivity was higher in detecting a typical Chest-CT pattern (60%) and abnormalities showing a middle-lower zone predominance (79%). Conclusions: As admission LUS may result falsely negative in most cases, it should not be considered as a reliable imaging tool in ruling out COVID-19 pneumonia in patients presenting in ED. It may at least represent an expanded clinical evaluation that needs integration with other diagnostic tests (e.g., nasopharyngeal swab, Chest-CT). MDPI 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8001137/ /pubmed/33806432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030236 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Quarato, Carla Maria Irene
Mirijello, Antonio
Lacedonia, Donato
Russo, Raffaele
Maggi, Michele Maria
Rea, Gaetano
Simeone, Annalisa
Borelli, Cristina
Feragalli, Beatrice
Scioscia, Giulia
Barbaro, Maria Pia Foschino
Massa, Valentina
De Cosmo, Salvatore
Sperandeo, Marco
Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia
title Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia
title_full Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia
title_fullStr Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia
title_short Low Sensitivity of Admission Lung US Compared to Chest CT for Diagnosis of Lung Involvement in a Cohort of 82 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia
title_sort low sensitivity of admission lung us compared to chest ct for diagnosis of lung involvement in a cohort of 82 patients with covid-19 pneumonia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030236
work_keys_str_mv AT quaratocarlamariairene lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT mirijelloantonio lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT lacedoniadonato lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT russoraffaele lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT maggimichelemaria lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT reagaetano lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT simeoneannalisa lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT borellicristina lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT feragallibeatrice lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT sciosciagiulia lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT barbaromariapiafoschino lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT massavalentina lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT decosmosalvatore lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia
AT sperandeomarco lowsensitivityofadmissionlunguscomparedtochestctfordiagnosisoflunginvolvementinacohortof82patientswithcovid19pneumonia