Cargando…
Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of wearable inertial motion unit (IMU) sensors in measuring spinal range of motion under supervised and unsupervised conditions in both laboratory and ambulatory settings. A secondary aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030490 |
_version_ | 1783671360362381312 |
---|---|
author | O’Grady, Megan O’Dwyer, Tom Connolly, James Condell, Joan Esquivel, Karla Muñoz O’Shea, Finbar D. Gardiner, Philip Wilson, Fiona |
author_facet | O’Grady, Megan O’Dwyer, Tom Connolly, James Condell, Joan Esquivel, Karla Muñoz O’Shea, Finbar D. Gardiner, Philip Wilson, Fiona |
author_sort | O’Grady, Megan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of wearable inertial motion unit (IMU) sensors in measuring spinal range of motion under supervised and unsupervised conditions in both laboratory and ambulatory settings. A secondary aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of composite IMU metrology scores (IMU-ASMI (Amb)). Forty people with axSpA participated in this clinical measurement study. Participant spinal mobility was assessed by conventional metrology (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, linear version—BASMI(Lin)) and by a wireless IMU sensor-based system which measured lumbar flexion-extension, lateral flexion and rotation. Each sensor-based movement test was converted to a normalized index and used to calculate IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). There was good to excellent agreement for all spinal range of movements (ICC > 0.85) and IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores (ICC > 0.87) across all conditions. Correlations between IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores and conventional metrology were strong (Pearson correlation ≥ 0.85). An IMU sensor-based system is a reliable way of measuring spinal lumbar mobility in axSpA under supervised and unsupervised conditions. While not a replacement for established clinical measures, composite IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores may be reliably used as a proxy measure of spinal mobility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8001996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80019962021-03-28 Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis O’Grady, Megan O’Dwyer, Tom Connolly, James Condell, Joan Esquivel, Karla Muñoz O’Shea, Finbar D. Gardiner, Philip Wilson, Fiona Diagnostics (Basel) Article The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of wearable inertial motion unit (IMU) sensors in measuring spinal range of motion under supervised and unsupervised conditions in both laboratory and ambulatory settings. A secondary aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of composite IMU metrology scores (IMU-ASMI (Amb)). Forty people with axSpA participated in this clinical measurement study. Participant spinal mobility was assessed by conventional metrology (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, linear version—BASMI(Lin)) and by a wireless IMU sensor-based system which measured lumbar flexion-extension, lateral flexion and rotation. Each sensor-based movement test was converted to a normalized index and used to calculate IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). There was good to excellent agreement for all spinal range of movements (ICC > 0.85) and IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores (ICC > 0.87) across all conditions. Correlations between IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores and conventional metrology were strong (Pearson correlation ≥ 0.85). An IMU sensor-based system is a reliable way of measuring spinal lumbar mobility in axSpA under supervised and unsupervised conditions. While not a replacement for established clinical measures, composite IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores may be reliably used as a proxy measure of spinal mobility. MDPI 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8001996/ /pubmed/33801982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030490 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article O’Grady, Megan O’Dwyer, Tom Connolly, James Condell, Joan Esquivel, Karla Muñoz O’Shea, Finbar D. Gardiner, Philip Wilson, Fiona Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title | Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title_full | Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title_fullStr | Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title_short | Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis |
title_sort | measuring spinal mobility using an inertial measurement unit system: a reliability study in axial spondyloarthritis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogradymegan measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis AT odwyertom measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis AT connollyjames measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis AT condelljoan measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis AT esquivelkarlamunoz measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis AT osheafinbard measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis AT gardinerphilip measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis AT wilsonfiona measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis |