Cargando…

Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of wearable inertial motion unit (IMU) sensors in measuring spinal range of motion under supervised and unsupervised conditions in both laboratory and ambulatory settings. A secondary aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Grady, Megan, O’Dwyer, Tom, Connolly, James, Condell, Joan, Esquivel, Karla Muñoz, O’Shea, Finbar D., Gardiner, Philip, Wilson, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801982
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030490
_version_ 1783671360362381312
author O’Grady, Megan
O’Dwyer, Tom
Connolly, James
Condell, Joan
Esquivel, Karla Muñoz
O’Shea, Finbar D.
Gardiner, Philip
Wilson, Fiona
author_facet O’Grady, Megan
O’Dwyer, Tom
Connolly, James
Condell, Joan
Esquivel, Karla Muñoz
O’Shea, Finbar D.
Gardiner, Philip
Wilson, Fiona
author_sort O’Grady, Megan
collection PubMed
description The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of wearable inertial motion unit (IMU) sensors in measuring spinal range of motion under supervised and unsupervised conditions in both laboratory and ambulatory settings. A secondary aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of composite IMU metrology scores (IMU-ASMI (Amb)). Forty people with axSpA participated in this clinical measurement study. Participant spinal mobility was assessed by conventional metrology (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, linear version—BASMI(Lin)) and by a wireless IMU sensor-based system which measured lumbar flexion-extension, lateral flexion and rotation. Each sensor-based movement test was converted to a normalized index and used to calculate IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). There was good to excellent agreement for all spinal range of movements (ICC > 0.85) and IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores (ICC > 0.87) across all conditions. Correlations between IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores and conventional metrology were strong (Pearson correlation ≥ 0.85). An IMU sensor-based system is a reliable way of measuring spinal lumbar mobility in axSpA under supervised and unsupervised conditions. While not a replacement for established clinical measures, composite IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores may be reliably used as a proxy measure of spinal mobility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8001996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80019962021-03-28 Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis O’Grady, Megan O’Dwyer, Tom Connolly, James Condell, Joan Esquivel, Karla Muñoz O’Shea, Finbar D. Gardiner, Philip Wilson, Fiona Diagnostics (Basel) Article The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of wearable inertial motion unit (IMU) sensors in measuring spinal range of motion under supervised and unsupervised conditions in both laboratory and ambulatory settings. A secondary aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of composite IMU metrology scores (IMU-ASMI (Amb)). Forty people with axSpA participated in this clinical measurement study. Participant spinal mobility was assessed by conventional metrology (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, linear version—BASMI(Lin)) and by a wireless IMU sensor-based system which measured lumbar flexion-extension, lateral flexion and rotation. Each sensor-based movement test was converted to a normalized index and used to calculate IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). There was good to excellent agreement for all spinal range of movements (ICC > 0.85) and IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores (ICC > 0.87) across all conditions. Correlations between IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores and conventional metrology were strong (Pearson correlation ≥ 0.85). An IMU sensor-based system is a reliable way of measuring spinal lumbar mobility in axSpA under supervised and unsupervised conditions. While not a replacement for established clinical measures, composite IMU-ASMI (Amb) scores may be reliably used as a proxy measure of spinal mobility. MDPI 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8001996/ /pubmed/33801982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030490 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
O’Grady, Megan
O’Dwyer, Tom
Connolly, James
Condell, Joan
Esquivel, Karla Muñoz
O’Shea, Finbar D.
Gardiner, Philip
Wilson, Fiona
Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis
title Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis
title_full Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis
title_fullStr Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis
title_short Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Reliability Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis
title_sort measuring spinal mobility using an inertial measurement unit system: a reliability study in axial spondyloarthritis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801982
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030490
work_keys_str_mv AT ogradymegan measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis
AT odwyertom measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis
AT connollyjames measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis
AT condelljoan measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis
AT esquivelkarlamunoz measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis
AT osheafinbard measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis
AT gardinerphilip measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis
AT wilsonfiona measuringspinalmobilityusinganinertialmeasurementunitsystemareliabilitystudyinaxialspondyloarthritis