Cargando…
Examining the Associations between Indigenous Rangers, Culture and Wellbeing in Australia, 2018–2020
The centrality of culture to Indigenous peoples’ health and wellbeing is becoming increasingly acknowledged in government policy. In Australia, the Indigenous Ranger program is a leading example of employment that supports increased cultural participation. In 2017, we demonstrated higher life satisf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33809609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063053 |
_version_ | 1783671419153940480 |
---|---|
author | Wright, Alyson Yap, Mandy Jones, Roxanne Richardson, Alice Davis, Vanessa Lovett, Raymond |
author_facet | Wright, Alyson Yap, Mandy Jones, Roxanne Richardson, Alice Davis, Vanessa Lovett, Raymond |
author_sort | Wright, Alyson |
collection | PubMed |
description | The centrality of culture to Indigenous peoples’ health and wellbeing is becoming increasingly acknowledged in government policy. In Australia, the Indigenous Ranger program is a leading example of employment that supports increased cultural participation. In 2017, we demonstrated higher life satisfaction and family wellbeing among Indigenous Rangers compared to non-Rangers in Central Australia. Using an expanded national dataset, this present study aimed to: examine if associations between Ranger status and wellbeing continued to be observed in Central Australia; assess if these associations were observed among non-Central Australian Rangers; and, quantify the effect of mediating variables (Rangers status, cultural factors) on wellbeing outcomes. We analyzed Mayi Kuwayu baseline data (n = 9691 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people) and compared participants who identified as past or currently employed Rangers compared to non-Rangers across two geographic locations (Central Australia, non-Central Australia). Ranger participation was significantly associated with very high life satisfaction and family wellbeing in Central Australia (high life satisfaction PR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09–1.57, and family wellbeing (PR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01–1.36) and non-Central Australia (high life satisfaction PR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06–1.57), family wellbeing (PR 1.37, 95% CI 1.14–1.65). These findings concord with those observed in the 2017 proof-of-concept study. Additionally, we found that Ranger status partially mediated the relationships between existing cultural practices (first language as your Indigenous language and living on your country) and the two wellbeing outcomes. Current cultural practices, spending time on country and speaking your Aboriginal language, also partially mediated the associations between Ranger status and high life satisfaction, and between Ranger status and high family wellbeing. This analysis supports evidence that both Ranger employment and cultural participation are contributors to wellbeing. Ranger work is not only good for land, but it is good for people. As such, determining policies that mutually acknowledge and enhance culture, health and wellbeing will likely have additional benefits for the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8002247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80022472021-03-28 Examining the Associations between Indigenous Rangers, Culture and Wellbeing in Australia, 2018–2020 Wright, Alyson Yap, Mandy Jones, Roxanne Richardson, Alice Davis, Vanessa Lovett, Raymond Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The centrality of culture to Indigenous peoples’ health and wellbeing is becoming increasingly acknowledged in government policy. In Australia, the Indigenous Ranger program is a leading example of employment that supports increased cultural participation. In 2017, we demonstrated higher life satisfaction and family wellbeing among Indigenous Rangers compared to non-Rangers in Central Australia. Using an expanded national dataset, this present study aimed to: examine if associations between Ranger status and wellbeing continued to be observed in Central Australia; assess if these associations were observed among non-Central Australian Rangers; and, quantify the effect of mediating variables (Rangers status, cultural factors) on wellbeing outcomes. We analyzed Mayi Kuwayu baseline data (n = 9691 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people) and compared participants who identified as past or currently employed Rangers compared to non-Rangers across two geographic locations (Central Australia, non-Central Australia). Ranger participation was significantly associated with very high life satisfaction and family wellbeing in Central Australia (high life satisfaction PR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09–1.57, and family wellbeing (PR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01–1.36) and non-Central Australia (high life satisfaction PR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06–1.57), family wellbeing (PR 1.37, 95% CI 1.14–1.65). These findings concord with those observed in the 2017 proof-of-concept study. Additionally, we found that Ranger status partially mediated the relationships between existing cultural practices (first language as your Indigenous language and living on your country) and the two wellbeing outcomes. Current cultural practices, spending time on country and speaking your Aboriginal language, also partially mediated the associations between Ranger status and high life satisfaction, and between Ranger status and high family wellbeing. This analysis supports evidence that both Ranger employment and cultural participation are contributors to wellbeing. Ranger work is not only good for land, but it is good for people. As such, determining policies that mutually acknowledge and enhance culture, health and wellbeing will likely have additional benefits for the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. MDPI 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8002247/ /pubmed/33809609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063053 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wright, Alyson Yap, Mandy Jones, Roxanne Richardson, Alice Davis, Vanessa Lovett, Raymond Examining the Associations between Indigenous Rangers, Culture and Wellbeing in Australia, 2018–2020 |
title | Examining the Associations between Indigenous Rangers, Culture and Wellbeing in Australia, 2018–2020 |
title_full | Examining the Associations between Indigenous Rangers, Culture and Wellbeing in Australia, 2018–2020 |
title_fullStr | Examining the Associations between Indigenous Rangers, Culture and Wellbeing in Australia, 2018–2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the Associations between Indigenous Rangers, Culture and Wellbeing in Australia, 2018–2020 |
title_short | Examining the Associations between Indigenous Rangers, Culture and Wellbeing in Australia, 2018–2020 |
title_sort | examining the associations between indigenous rangers, culture and wellbeing in australia, 2018–2020 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33809609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wrightalyson examiningtheassociationsbetweenindigenousrangerscultureandwellbeinginaustralia20182020 AT yapmandy examiningtheassociationsbetweenindigenousrangerscultureandwellbeinginaustralia20182020 AT jonesroxanne examiningtheassociationsbetweenindigenousrangerscultureandwellbeinginaustralia20182020 AT richardsonalice examiningtheassociationsbetweenindigenousrangerscultureandwellbeinginaustralia20182020 AT davisvanessa examiningtheassociationsbetweenindigenousrangerscultureandwellbeinginaustralia20182020 AT lovettraymond examiningtheassociationsbetweenindigenousrangerscultureandwellbeinginaustralia20182020 |