Cargando…

Synthesis and Morphological Control of VO(2) Nanostructures via a One-Step Hydrothermal Method

The morphology of nanostructures is a vital parameter to consider in components comprised of materials exhibiting specific functionalities. The number of process steps and the need for high temperatures can often be a limiting factor when targeting a specific morphology. Here, we demonstrate a repea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karahan, Ozlem, Tufani, Ali, Unal, Serkan, Misirlioglu, I. Burc, Menceloglu, Yusuf Z., Sendur, Kursat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11030752
Descripción
Sumario:The morphology of nanostructures is a vital parameter to consider in components comprised of materials exhibiting specific functionalities. The number of process steps and the need for high temperatures can often be a limiting factor when targeting a specific morphology. Here, we demonstrate a repeatable synthesis of different morphologies of a highly crystalline monoclinic phase of vanadium dioxide (VO(2)(M)) using a one-step hydrothermal method. By adjusting the synthesis parameters, such as pH, temperature, and reducing agent concentration in the precursor, VO(2) nanostructures with high uniformity and crystallinity are achieved. Some of these morphologies were obtained via the choice of the reducing agent that allowed us to skip the annealing step. Our results indicate that the morphologies of the nanostructures are very sensitive to the hydrazine hydrate (N(2)H(4).H(2)O) concentration. Another reducing agent, dodecylamine, was used to achieve well-organized and high-quality VO(2)(M) nanotubes. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) experiments revealed that all samples display the monoclinic-to-tetragonal structural transition (MTST) regardless of the morphology, albeit at different temperatures that can be interpreted as the variations in overheating and undercooling limits. VO(2)(M) structures with a higher surface to volume ratio exhibit a higher overheating limit than those with low ratios.