Cargando…

T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM

Patients with unilateral vocal fold cancer (T1a) have a favorable prognosis. In addition to the oncological results of CO(2) transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS), voice function is among the outcome measures. Previous early glottic cancer studies have reported voice function in patients grouped into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Wen, Caffier, Felix, Nawka, Tadeus, Ermakova, Tatiana, Martin, Alexios, Mürbe, Dirk, Caffier, Philipp P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802971
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061250
_version_ 1783671536280928256
author Song, Wen
Caffier, Felix
Nawka, Tadeus
Ermakova, Tatiana
Martin, Alexios
Mürbe, Dirk
Caffier, Philipp P.
author_facet Song, Wen
Caffier, Felix
Nawka, Tadeus
Ermakova, Tatiana
Martin, Alexios
Mürbe, Dirk
Caffier, Philipp P.
author_sort Song, Wen
collection PubMed
description Patients with unilateral vocal fold cancer (T1a) have a favorable prognosis. In addition to the oncological results of CO(2) transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS), voice function is among the outcome measures. Previous early glottic cancer studies have reported voice function in patients grouped into combined T stages (Tis, T1, T2) and merged cordectomy types (lesser- vs. larger-extent cordectomies). Some authors have questioned the value of objective vocal parameters. Therefore, the purpose of this exploratory prospective study was to investigate TOLMS-associated oncological and vocal outcomes in 60 T1a patients, applying the ELS protocols for cordectomy classification and voice assessment. Pre- and postoperative voice function analysis included: Vocal Extent Measure (VEM), Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), auditory-perceptual assessment (GRB), and 9-item Voice Handicap Index (VHI-9i). Altogether, 51 subjects (43 male, eight female, mean age 65 years) completed the study. The 5-year recurrence-free, overall, and disease-specific survival rates (Kaplan–Meier method) were 71.4%, 94.4%, and 100.0%. Voice function was preserved; the objective parameter VEM (64 ± 33 vs. 83 ± 31; mean ± SD) and subjective vocal measures (G: 1.9 ± 0.7 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7; VHI-9i: 18 ± 8 vs. 9 ± 9) even improved significantly (p < 0.001). The VEM best reflected self-perceived voice impairment. It represents a sensitive measure of voice function for quantification of vocal performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8002749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80027492021-03-28 T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM Song, Wen Caffier, Felix Nawka, Tadeus Ermakova, Tatiana Martin, Alexios Mürbe, Dirk Caffier, Philipp P. J Clin Med Article Patients with unilateral vocal fold cancer (T1a) have a favorable prognosis. In addition to the oncological results of CO(2) transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS), voice function is among the outcome measures. Previous early glottic cancer studies have reported voice function in patients grouped into combined T stages (Tis, T1, T2) and merged cordectomy types (lesser- vs. larger-extent cordectomies). Some authors have questioned the value of objective vocal parameters. Therefore, the purpose of this exploratory prospective study was to investigate TOLMS-associated oncological and vocal outcomes in 60 T1a patients, applying the ELS protocols for cordectomy classification and voice assessment. Pre- and postoperative voice function analysis included: Vocal Extent Measure (VEM), Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), auditory-perceptual assessment (GRB), and 9-item Voice Handicap Index (VHI-9i). Altogether, 51 subjects (43 male, eight female, mean age 65 years) completed the study. The 5-year recurrence-free, overall, and disease-specific survival rates (Kaplan–Meier method) were 71.4%, 94.4%, and 100.0%. Voice function was preserved; the objective parameter VEM (64 ± 33 vs. 83 ± 31; mean ± SD) and subjective vocal measures (G: 1.9 ± 0.7 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7; VHI-9i: 18 ± 8 vs. 9 ± 9) even improved significantly (p < 0.001). The VEM best reflected self-perceived voice impairment. It represents a sensitive measure of voice function for quantification of vocal performance. MDPI 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8002749/ /pubmed/33802971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061250 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Song, Wen
Caffier, Felix
Nawka, Tadeus
Ermakova, Tatiana
Martin, Alexios
Mürbe, Dirk
Caffier, Philipp P.
T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM
title T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM
title_full T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM
title_fullStr T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM
title_full_unstemmed T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM
title_short T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM
title_sort t1a glottic cancer: advances in vocal outcome assessment after transoral co(2)-laser microsurgery using the vem
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802971
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061250
work_keys_str_mv AT songwen t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem
AT caffierfelix t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem
AT nawkatadeus t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem
AT ermakovatatiana t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem
AT martinalexios t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem
AT murbedirk t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem
AT caffierphilippp t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem