Cargando…
T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM
Patients with unilateral vocal fold cancer (T1a) have a favorable prognosis. In addition to the oncological results of CO(2) transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS), voice function is among the outcome measures. Previous early glottic cancer studies have reported voice function in patients grouped into...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061250 |
_version_ | 1783671536280928256 |
---|---|
author | Song, Wen Caffier, Felix Nawka, Tadeus Ermakova, Tatiana Martin, Alexios Mürbe, Dirk Caffier, Philipp P. |
author_facet | Song, Wen Caffier, Felix Nawka, Tadeus Ermakova, Tatiana Martin, Alexios Mürbe, Dirk Caffier, Philipp P. |
author_sort | Song, Wen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with unilateral vocal fold cancer (T1a) have a favorable prognosis. In addition to the oncological results of CO(2) transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS), voice function is among the outcome measures. Previous early glottic cancer studies have reported voice function in patients grouped into combined T stages (Tis, T1, T2) and merged cordectomy types (lesser- vs. larger-extent cordectomies). Some authors have questioned the value of objective vocal parameters. Therefore, the purpose of this exploratory prospective study was to investigate TOLMS-associated oncological and vocal outcomes in 60 T1a patients, applying the ELS protocols for cordectomy classification and voice assessment. Pre- and postoperative voice function analysis included: Vocal Extent Measure (VEM), Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), auditory-perceptual assessment (GRB), and 9-item Voice Handicap Index (VHI-9i). Altogether, 51 subjects (43 male, eight female, mean age 65 years) completed the study. The 5-year recurrence-free, overall, and disease-specific survival rates (Kaplan–Meier method) were 71.4%, 94.4%, and 100.0%. Voice function was preserved; the objective parameter VEM (64 ± 33 vs. 83 ± 31; mean ± SD) and subjective vocal measures (G: 1.9 ± 0.7 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7; VHI-9i: 18 ± 8 vs. 9 ± 9) even improved significantly (p < 0.001). The VEM best reflected self-perceived voice impairment. It represents a sensitive measure of voice function for quantification of vocal performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8002749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80027492021-03-28 T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM Song, Wen Caffier, Felix Nawka, Tadeus Ermakova, Tatiana Martin, Alexios Mürbe, Dirk Caffier, Philipp P. J Clin Med Article Patients with unilateral vocal fold cancer (T1a) have a favorable prognosis. In addition to the oncological results of CO(2) transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS), voice function is among the outcome measures. Previous early glottic cancer studies have reported voice function in patients grouped into combined T stages (Tis, T1, T2) and merged cordectomy types (lesser- vs. larger-extent cordectomies). Some authors have questioned the value of objective vocal parameters. Therefore, the purpose of this exploratory prospective study was to investigate TOLMS-associated oncological and vocal outcomes in 60 T1a patients, applying the ELS protocols for cordectomy classification and voice assessment. Pre- and postoperative voice function analysis included: Vocal Extent Measure (VEM), Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), auditory-perceptual assessment (GRB), and 9-item Voice Handicap Index (VHI-9i). Altogether, 51 subjects (43 male, eight female, mean age 65 years) completed the study. The 5-year recurrence-free, overall, and disease-specific survival rates (Kaplan–Meier method) were 71.4%, 94.4%, and 100.0%. Voice function was preserved; the objective parameter VEM (64 ± 33 vs. 83 ± 31; mean ± SD) and subjective vocal measures (G: 1.9 ± 0.7 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7; VHI-9i: 18 ± 8 vs. 9 ± 9) even improved significantly (p < 0.001). The VEM best reflected self-perceived voice impairment. It represents a sensitive measure of voice function for quantification of vocal performance. MDPI 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8002749/ /pubmed/33802971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061250 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Song, Wen Caffier, Felix Nawka, Tadeus Ermakova, Tatiana Martin, Alexios Mürbe, Dirk Caffier, Philipp P. T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM |
title | T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM |
title_full | T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM |
title_fullStr | T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM |
title_full_unstemmed | T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM |
title_short | T1a Glottic Cancer: Advances in Vocal Outcome Assessment after Transoral CO(2)-Laser Microsurgery Using the VEM |
title_sort | t1a glottic cancer: advances in vocal outcome assessment after transoral co(2)-laser microsurgery using the vem |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songwen t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem AT caffierfelix t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem AT nawkatadeus t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem AT ermakovatatiana t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem AT martinalexios t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem AT murbedirk t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem AT caffierphilippp t1aglotticcanceradvancesinvocaloutcomeassessmentaftertransoralco2lasermicrosurgeryusingthevem |