Cargando…

A Comparison of the Transcriptomes of Cowpeas in Response to Two Different Ionizing Radiations

In this study, gene expression changes in cowpea plants irradiated by two different types of radiation: proton-beams and gamma-rays were investigated. Seeds of the Okdang cultivar were exposed to 100, 200, and 300 Gy of gamma-rays and proton-beams. In transcriptome analysis, the 32, 75, and 69 diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Ryulyi, Seo, Eunju, Park, Aron, Kim, Woon Ji, Kang, Byeong Hee, Lee, Jeong-Hee, Kim, Sang Hoon, Kang, Si-Yong, Ha, Bo-Keun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802840
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10030567
_version_ 1783671540896759808
author Kang, Ryulyi
Seo, Eunju
Park, Aron
Kim, Woon Ji
Kang, Byeong Hee
Lee, Jeong-Hee
Kim, Sang Hoon
Kang, Si-Yong
Ha, Bo-Keun
author_facet Kang, Ryulyi
Seo, Eunju
Park, Aron
Kim, Woon Ji
Kang, Byeong Hee
Lee, Jeong-Hee
Kim, Sang Hoon
Kang, Si-Yong
Ha, Bo-Keun
author_sort Kang, Ryulyi
collection PubMed
description In this study, gene expression changes in cowpea plants irradiated by two different types of radiation: proton-beams and gamma-rays were investigated. Seeds of the Okdang cultivar were exposed to 100, 200, and 300 Gy of gamma-rays and proton-beams. In transcriptome analysis, the 32, 75, and 69 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) at each dose of gamma-ray irradiation compared with that of the control were identified. A total of eight genes were commonly up-regulated for all gamma-ray doses. However, there were no down-regulated genes. In contrast, 168, 434, and 387 DEGs were identified for each dose of proton-beam irradiation compared with that of the control. A total of 61 DEGs were commonly up-regulated for all proton-beam doses. As a result of GO and KEGG analysis, the ranks of functional categories according to the number of DEGs were not the same in both treatments and were more diverse in terms of pathways in the proton-beam treatments than gamma-ray treatments. The number of genes related to defense, photosynthesis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), plant hormones, and transcription factors (TF) that were up-/down-regulated was higher in the proton beam treatment than that in gamma ray treatment. Proton-beam treatment had a distinct mutation spectrum and gene expression pattern compared to that of gamma-ray treatment. These results provide important information on the mechanism for gene regulation in response to two ionizing radiations in cowpeas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8002818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80028182021-03-28 A Comparison of the Transcriptomes of Cowpeas in Response to Two Different Ionizing Radiations Kang, Ryulyi Seo, Eunju Park, Aron Kim, Woon Ji Kang, Byeong Hee Lee, Jeong-Hee Kim, Sang Hoon Kang, Si-Yong Ha, Bo-Keun Plants (Basel) Article In this study, gene expression changes in cowpea plants irradiated by two different types of radiation: proton-beams and gamma-rays were investigated. Seeds of the Okdang cultivar were exposed to 100, 200, and 300 Gy of gamma-rays and proton-beams. In transcriptome analysis, the 32, 75, and 69 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) at each dose of gamma-ray irradiation compared with that of the control were identified. A total of eight genes were commonly up-regulated for all gamma-ray doses. However, there were no down-regulated genes. In contrast, 168, 434, and 387 DEGs were identified for each dose of proton-beam irradiation compared with that of the control. A total of 61 DEGs were commonly up-regulated for all proton-beam doses. As a result of GO and KEGG analysis, the ranks of functional categories according to the number of DEGs were not the same in both treatments and were more diverse in terms of pathways in the proton-beam treatments than gamma-ray treatments. The number of genes related to defense, photosynthesis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), plant hormones, and transcription factors (TF) that were up-/down-regulated was higher in the proton beam treatment than that in gamma ray treatment. Proton-beam treatment had a distinct mutation spectrum and gene expression pattern compared to that of gamma-ray treatment. These results provide important information on the mechanism for gene regulation in response to two ionizing radiations in cowpeas. MDPI 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8002818/ /pubmed/33802840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10030567 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Kang, Ryulyi
Seo, Eunju
Park, Aron
Kim, Woon Ji
Kang, Byeong Hee
Lee, Jeong-Hee
Kim, Sang Hoon
Kang, Si-Yong
Ha, Bo-Keun
A Comparison of the Transcriptomes of Cowpeas in Response to Two Different Ionizing Radiations
title A Comparison of the Transcriptomes of Cowpeas in Response to Two Different Ionizing Radiations
title_full A Comparison of the Transcriptomes of Cowpeas in Response to Two Different Ionizing Radiations
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Transcriptomes of Cowpeas in Response to Two Different Ionizing Radiations
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Transcriptomes of Cowpeas in Response to Two Different Ionizing Radiations
title_short A Comparison of the Transcriptomes of Cowpeas in Response to Two Different Ionizing Radiations
title_sort comparison of the transcriptomes of cowpeas in response to two different ionizing radiations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8002818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33802840
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10030567
work_keys_str_mv AT kangryulyi acomparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT seoeunju acomparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT parkaron acomparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT kimwoonji acomparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT kangbyeonghee acomparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT leejeonghee acomparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT kimsanghoon acomparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT kangsiyong acomparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT habokeun acomparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT kangryulyi comparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT seoeunju comparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT parkaron comparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT kimwoonji comparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT kangbyeonghee comparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT leejeonghee comparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT kimsanghoon comparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT kangsiyong comparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations
AT habokeun comparisonofthetranscriptomesofcowpeasinresponsetotwodifferentionizingradiations