Cargando…
Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews
Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems have been suggested to have clinical beneficial effects in patients with diabetes mellitus, although their improvements in terms of quality of life (QoL) and patients’ satisfaction are not always addressed or are considered a secondary outcome. Thus, the aim of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803558 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063123 |
_version_ | 1783671596241649664 |
---|---|
author | Díez-Fernández, Ana Rodríguez-Huerta, María Dolores Mirón-González, Rubén Laredo-Aguilera, José Alberto Martín-Espinosa, Noelia María |
author_facet | Díez-Fernández, Ana Rodríguez-Huerta, María Dolores Mirón-González, Rubén Laredo-Aguilera, José Alberto Martín-Espinosa, Noelia María |
author_sort | Díez-Fernández, Ana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems have been suggested to have clinical beneficial effects in patients with diabetes mellitus, although their improvements in terms of quality of life (QoL) and patients’ satisfaction are not always addressed or are considered a secondary outcome. Thus, the aim of this meta-review is to establish the benefits of FGM in terms of patients’ satisfaction and QoL in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients using evidence from past systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Major databases were searched for systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that assessed the satisfaction or QoL of type 1 or 2 diabetes patients using FGM compared with other glucose monitoring systems. The quality of the included systematic reviews was addressed with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. Six systematic reviews (including two meta-analyses) were included in the meta-review. Evidence suggests that FGM systems seem to improve patients’ satisfaction and QoL compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose, although the high variability in the measurement tools, the clinical significance and the quality of the systematic reviews included do not allow us to state FGM benefits with any certainty. Further research, including high-quality randomised clinical trials, differentiating the needs of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients and focusing on psychosocial benefits for these patients is needed to optimise clinical decisions between patients and professionals by developing the right health technology assessment for FGM systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8003041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80030412021-03-28 Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews Díez-Fernández, Ana Rodríguez-Huerta, María Dolores Mirón-González, Rubén Laredo-Aguilera, José Alberto Martín-Espinosa, Noelia María Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems have been suggested to have clinical beneficial effects in patients with diabetes mellitus, although their improvements in terms of quality of life (QoL) and patients’ satisfaction are not always addressed or are considered a secondary outcome. Thus, the aim of this meta-review is to establish the benefits of FGM in terms of patients’ satisfaction and QoL in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients using evidence from past systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Major databases were searched for systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that assessed the satisfaction or QoL of type 1 or 2 diabetes patients using FGM compared with other glucose monitoring systems. The quality of the included systematic reviews was addressed with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. Six systematic reviews (including two meta-analyses) were included in the meta-review. Evidence suggests that FGM systems seem to improve patients’ satisfaction and QoL compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose, although the high variability in the measurement tools, the clinical significance and the quality of the systematic reviews included do not allow us to state FGM benefits with any certainty. Further research, including high-quality randomised clinical trials, differentiating the needs of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients and focusing on psychosocial benefits for these patients is needed to optimise clinical decisions between patients and professionals by developing the right health technology assessment for FGM systems. MDPI 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8003041/ /pubmed/33803558 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063123 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Díez-Fernández, Ana Rodríguez-Huerta, María Dolores Mirón-González, Rubén Laredo-Aguilera, José Alberto Martín-Espinosa, Noelia María Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews |
title | Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews |
title_full | Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews |
title_fullStr | Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews |
title_short | Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews |
title_sort | flash glucose monitoring and patient satisfaction: a meta-review of systematic reviews |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803558 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diezfernandezana flashglucosemonitoringandpatientsatisfactionametareviewofsystematicreviews AT rodriguezhuertamariadolores flashglucosemonitoringandpatientsatisfactionametareviewofsystematicreviews AT mirongonzalezruben flashglucosemonitoringandpatientsatisfactionametareviewofsystematicreviews AT laredoaguilerajosealberto flashglucosemonitoringandpatientsatisfactionametareviewofsystematicreviews AT martinespinosanoeliamaria flashglucosemonitoringandpatientsatisfactionametareviewofsystematicreviews |