Cargando…

Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study

Although the use of microaxilar mechanical circulatory support systems may improve the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), little is known about its effect on the long-term structural integrity of left ventricular (LV) valves as well as on the development of LV-architecture. Therefore,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chatzis, Georgios, Syntila, Styliani, Schuett, Harald, Waechter, Christian, Ahrens, Holger, Markus, Birgit, Divchev, Dimitar, Rogmann, Marc, Karatolios, Konstantinos, Bouras, Georgios, Schieffer, Bernhard, Luesebrink, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061273
_version_ 1783671648599146496
author Chatzis, Georgios
Syntila, Styliani
Schuett, Harald
Waechter, Christian
Ahrens, Holger
Markus, Birgit
Divchev, Dimitar
Rogmann, Marc
Karatolios, Konstantinos
Bouras, Georgios
Schieffer, Bernhard
Luesebrink, Ulrich
author_facet Chatzis, Georgios
Syntila, Styliani
Schuett, Harald
Waechter, Christian
Ahrens, Holger
Markus, Birgit
Divchev, Dimitar
Rogmann, Marc
Karatolios, Konstantinos
Bouras, Georgios
Schieffer, Bernhard
Luesebrink, Ulrich
author_sort Chatzis, Georgios
collection PubMed
description Although the use of microaxilar mechanical circulatory support systems may improve the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), little is known about its effect on the long-term structural integrity of left ventricular (LV) valves as well as on the development of LV-architecture. Therefore, we aimed to study the integrity of the LV valves and architecture and function after Impella support. Thus, 84 consecutive patients were monitored over two years having received Impella(TM) CP (n = 24) or 2.5 (n = 60) for refractory CS (n = 62) or for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (n = 22) followed by optimal medical treatment. Beside a significant increase in LV ejection fraction after two years (p ≤ 0.03 vs. pre-implantation), we observed a statistically significant decrease in LV dilation (p < 0.001) and severity of mitral valve regurgitation (p = 0.007) in the two-year follow-up period, suggesting an improved LV architecture. Neither the duration of support, nor the size of the Impella device or the indication for its use revealed any devastating impact on aortic or mitral valve integrity. These findings indicate that Impella device is a safe means of support of LV-function without detrimental long-term effects on the structural integrity of LV valves regardless of the size of the device or the indication of support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8003263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80032632021-03-28 Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study Chatzis, Georgios Syntila, Styliani Schuett, Harald Waechter, Christian Ahrens, Holger Markus, Birgit Divchev, Dimitar Rogmann, Marc Karatolios, Konstantinos Bouras, Georgios Schieffer, Bernhard Luesebrink, Ulrich J Clin Med Article Although the use of microaxilar mechanical circulatory support systems may improve the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), little is known about its effect on the long-term structural integrity of left ventricular (LV) valves as well as on the development of LV-architecture. Therefore, we aimed to study the integrity of the LV valves and architecture and function after Impella support. Thus, 84 consecutive patients were monitored over two years having received Impella(TM) CP (n = 24) or 2.5 (n = 60) for refractory CS (n = 62) or for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (n = 22) followed by optimal medical treatment. Beside a significant increase in LV ejection fraction after two years (p ≤ 0.03 vs. pre-implantation), we observed a statistically significant decrease in LV dilation (p < 0.001) and severity of mitral valve regurgitation (p = 0.007) in the two-year follow-up period, suggesting an improved LV architecture. Neither the duration of support, nor the size of the Impella device or the indication for its use revealed any devastating impact on aortic or mitral valve integrity. These findings indicate that Impella device is a safe means of support of LV-function without detrimental long-term effects on the structural integrity of LV valves regardless of the size of the device or the indication of support. MDPI 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8003263/ /pubmed/33803898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061273 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chatzis, Georgios
Syntila, Styliani
Schuett, Harald
Waechter, Christian
Ahrens, Holger
Markus, Birgit
Divchev, Dimitar
Rogmann, Marc
Karatolios, Konstantinos
Bouras, Georgios
Schieffer, Bernhard
Luesebrink, Ulrich
Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_fullStr Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full_unstemmed Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_short Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_sort left ventricle architecture and valvular integrity following microaxial mechanical support: a two-year follow-up study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061273
work_keys_str_mv AT chatzisgeorgios leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT syntilastyliani leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT schuettharald leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT waechterchristian leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT ahrensholger leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT markusbirgit leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT divchevdimitar leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT rogmannmarc leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT karatolioskonstantinos leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT bourasgeorgios leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT schiefferbernhard leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT luesebrinkulrich leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy