Cargando…
Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
Although the use of microaxilar mechanical circulatory support systems may improve the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), little is known about its effect on the long-term structural integrity of left ventricular (LV) valves as well as on the development of LV-architecture. Therefore,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061273 |
_version_ | 1783671648599146496 |
---|---|
author | Chatzis, Georgios Syntila, Styliani Schuett, Harald Waechter, Christian Ahrens, Holger Markus, Birgit Divchev, Dimitar Rogmann, Marc Karatolios, Konstantinos Bouras, Georgios Schieffer, Bernhard Luesebrink, Ulrich |
author_facet | Chatzis, Georgios Syntila, Styliani Schuett, Harald Waechter, Christian Ahrens, Holger Markus, Birgit Divchev, Dimitar Rogmann, Marc Karatolios, Konstantinos Bouras, Georgios Schieffer, Bernhard Luesebrink, Ulrich |
author_sort | Chatzis, Georgios |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the use of microaxilar mechanical circulatory support systems may improve the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), little is known about its effect on the long-term structural integrity of left ventricular (LV) valves as well as on the development of LV-architecture. Therefore, we aimed to study the integrity of the LV valves and architecture and function after Impella support. Thus, 84 consecutive patients were monitored over two years having received Impella(TM) CP (n = 24) or 2.5 (n = 60) for refractory CS (n = 62) or for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (n = 22) followed by optimal medical treatment. Beside a significant increase in LV ejection fraction after two years (p ≤ 0.03 vs. pre-implantation), we observed a statistically significant decrease in LV dilation (p < 0.001) and severity of mitral valve regurgitation (p = 0.007) in the two-year follow-up period, suggesting an improved LV architecture. Neither the duration of support, nor the size of the Impella device or the indication for its use revealed any devastating impact on aortic or mitral valve integrity. These findings indicate that Impella device is a safe means of support of LV-function without detrimental long-term effects on the structural integrity of LV valves regardless of the size of the device or the indication of support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8003263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80032632021-03-28 Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study Chatzis, Georgios Syntila, Styliani Schuett, Harald Waechter, Christian Ahrens, Holger Markus, Birgit Divchev, Dimitar Rogmann, Marc Karatolios, Konstantinos Bouras, Georgios Schieffer, Bernhard Luesebrink, Ulrich J Clin Med Article Although the use of microaxilar mechanical circulatory support systems may improve the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), little is known about its effect on the long-term structural integrity of left ventricular (LV) valves as well as on the development of LV-architecture. Therefore, we aimed to study the integrity of the LV valves and architecture and function after Impella support. Thus, 84 consecutive patients were monitored over two years having received Impella(TM) CP (n = 24) or 2.5 (n = 60) for refractory CS (n = 62) or for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (n = 22) followed by optimal medical treatment. Beside a significant increase in LV ejection fraction after two years (p ≤ 0.03 vs. pre-implantation), we observed a statistically significant decrease in LV dilation (p < 0.001) and severity of mitral valve regurgitation (p = 0.007) in the two-year follow-up period, suggesting an improved LV architecture. Neither the duration of support, nor the size of the Impella device or the indication for its use revealed any devastating impact on aortic or mitral valve integrity. These findings indicate that Impella device is a safe means of support of LV-function without detrimental long-term effects on the structural integrity of LV valves regardless of the size of the device or the indication of support. MDPI 2021-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8003263/ /pubmed/33803898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061273 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chatzis, Georgios Syntila, Styliani Schuett, Harald Waechter, Christian Ahrens, Holger Markus, Birgit Divchev, Dimitar Rogmann, Marc Karatolios, Konstantinos Bouras, Georgios Schieffer, Bernhard Luesebrink, Ulrich Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study |
title | Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_full | Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_fullStr | Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_short | Left Ventricle Architecture and Valvular Integrity Following Microaxial Mechanical Support: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_sort | left ventricle architecture and valvular integrity following microaxial mechanical support: a two-year follow-up study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chatzisgeorgios leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT syntilastyliani leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT schuettharald leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT waechterchristian leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT ahrensholger leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT markusbirgit leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT divchevdimitar leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT rogmannmarc leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT karatolioskonstantinos leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT bourasgeorgios leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT schiefferbernhard leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy AT luesebrinkulrich leftventriclearchitectureandvalvularintegrityfollowingmicroaxialmechanicalsupportatwoyearfollowupstudy |