Cargando…

Mechanical and Morphological Assessment of an Innovative Textile for Patient Positioning Applications: Comparison to Two Standard Bandage Systems

In the healthcare environment, bandage systems are versatile medical devices to position and fix patients’ torsos or extremities. In this study, the mechanical and morphological properties of an innovative patient position system, iFix, were assessed and compared to two commercially available bandag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putzer, David, Dammerer, Dietmar, Coraça-Huber, Débora, Pallua, Johannes, Schmölz, Werner, Nogler, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808789
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14061508
_version_ 1783671686078398464
author Putzer, David
Dammerer, Dietmar
Coraça-Huber, Débora
Pallua, Johannes
Schmölz, Werner
Nogler, Michael
author_facet Putzer, David
Dammerer, Dietmar
Coraça-Huber, Débora
Pallua, Johannes
Schmölz, Werner
Nogler, Michael
author_sort Putzer, David
collection PubMed
description In the healthcare environment, bandage systems are versatile medical devices to position and fix patients’ torsos or extremities. In this study, the mechanical and morphological properties of an innovative patient position system, iFix, were assessed and compared to two commercially available bandages. Morphological properties were investigated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The iFix bandage showed anisotropic mechanical properties, with a more rigid behavior in the longitudinal direction and a more elastic behavior in the transverse direction. This behavior results from the organization of the fibers visible in the SEM images. All three materials investigated in this study were able to support similar maximum loads. In cases where a rigid fixation of patient limbs or torso is necessary, the authors recommend the usage of iFix. In vivo studies should be carried out to prove safety in a surgical environment before its clinical usage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8003422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80034222021-03-28 Mechanical and Morphological Assessment of an Innovative Textile for Patient Positioning Applications: Comparison to Two Standard Bandage Systems Putzer, David Dammerer, Dietmar Coraça-Huber, Débora Pallua, Johannes Schmölz, Werner Nogler, Michael Materials (Basel) Article In the healthcare environment, bandage systems are versatile medical devices to position and fix patients’ torsos or extremities. In this study, the mechanical and morphological properties of an innovative patient position system, iFix, were assessed and compared to two commercially available bandages. Morphological properties were investigated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The iFix bandage showed anisotropic mechanical properties, with a more rigid behavior in the longitudinal direction and a more elastic behavior in the transverse direction. This behavior results from the organization of the fibers visible in the SEM images. All three materials investigated in this study were able to support similar maximum loads. In cases where a rigid fixation of patient limbs or torso is necessary, the authors recommend the usage of iFix. In vivo studies should be carried out to prove safety in a surgical environment before its clinical usage. MDPI 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8003422/ /pubmed/33808789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14061508 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Putzer, David
Dammerer, Dietmar
Coraça-Huber, Débora
Pallua, Johannes
Schmölz, Werner
Nogler, Michael
Mechanical and Morphological Assessment of an Innovative Textile for Patient Positioning Applications: Comparison to Two Standard Bandage Systems
title Mechanical and Morphological Assessment of an Innovative Textile for Patient Positioning Applications: Comparison to Two Standard Bandage Systems
title_full Mechanical and Morphological Assessment of an Innovative Textile for Patient Positioning Applications: Comparison to Two Standard Bandage Systems
title_fullStr Mechanical and Morphological Assessment of an Innovative Textile for Patient Positioning Applications: Comparison to Two Standard Bandage Systems
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical and Morphological Assessment of an Innovative Textile for Patient Positioning Applications: Comparison to Two Standard Bandage Systems
title_short Mechanical and Morphological Assessment of an Innovative Textile for Patient Positioning Applications: Comparison to Two Standard Bandage Systems
title_sort mechanical and morphological assessment of an innovative textile for patient positioning applications: comparison to two standard bandage systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808789
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14061508
work_keys_str_mv AT putzerdavid mechanicalandmorphologicalassessmentofaninnovativetextileforpatientpositioningapplicationscomparisontotwostandardbandagesystems
AT dammererdietmar mechanicalandmorphologicalassessmentofaninnovativetextileforpatientpositioningapplicationscomparisontotwostandardbandagesystems
AT coracahuberdebora mechanicalandmorphologicalassessmentofaninnovativetextileforpatientpositioningapplicationscomparisontotwostandardbandagesystems
AT palluajohannes mechanicalandmorphologicalassessmentofaninnovativetextileforpatientpositioningapplicationscomparisontotwostandardbandagesystems
AT schmolzwerner mechanicalandmorphologicalassessmentofaninnovativetextileforpatientpositioningapplicationscomparisontotwostandardbandagesystems
AT noglermichael mechanicalandmorphologicalassessmentofaninnovativetextileforpatientpositioningapplicationscomparisontotwostandardbandagesystems