Cargando…

Selection of Gut-Resistant Bacteria and Construction of Microbial Consortia for Improving Gluten Digestion under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions

This work aimed to define the microbial consortia that are able to digest gluten into non-toxic and non-immunogenic peptides in the human gastrointestinal tract. Methods: 131 out of 504 tested Bacillus and lactic acid bacteria, specifically Bacillus (64), lactobacilli (63), Pediococcus (1), and Weis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Angelis, Maria, Siragusa, Sonya, Vacca, Mirco, Di Cagno, Raffaella, Cristofori, Fernanda, Schwarm, Michael, Pelzer, Stefan, Flügel, Monika, Speckmann, Bodo, Francavilla, Ruggiero, Gobbetti, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13030992
_version_ 1783671697140875264
author De Angelis, Maria
Siragusa, Sonya
Vacca, Mirco
Di Cagno, Raffaella
Cristofori, Fernanda
Schwarm, Michael
Pelzer, Stefan
Flügel, Monika
Speckmann, Bodo
Francavilla, Ruggiero
Gobbetti, Marco
author_facet De Angelis, Maria
Siragusa, Sonya
Vacca, Mirco
Di Cagno, Raffaella
Cristofori, Fernanda
Schwarm, Michael
Pelzer, Stefan
Flügel, Monika
Speckmann, Bodo
Francavilla, Ruggiero
Gobbetti, Marco
author_sort De Angelis, Maria
collection PubMed
description This work aimed to define the microbial consortia that are able to digest gluten into non-toxic and non-immunogenic peptides in the human gastrointestinal tract. Methods: 131 out of 504 tested Bacillus and lactic acid bacteria, specifically Bacillus (64), lactobacilli (63), Pediococcus (1), and Weissella (3), showed strong gastrointestinal resistance and were selected for their PepN, PepI, PepX, PepO, and PepP activities toward synthetic substrates. Based on multivariate analysis, 24 strains were clearly distinct from the other tested strains based on having the highest enzymatic activities. As estimated by RP-HPLC and nano-ESI–MS/MS, 6 cytoplasmic extracts out of 24 selected strains showed the ability to hydrolyze immunogenic epitopes, specifically 57–68 of α9-gliadin, 62–75 of A-gliadin, 134–153 of γ-gliadin, and 57–89 (33-mer) of α2-gliadin. Live and lysed cells of selected strains were combined into different microbial consortia for hydrolyzing gluten under gastrointestinal conditions. Commercial proteolytic enzymes (Aspergillus oryzae E1, Aspergillus niger E2, Bacillus subtilis Veron HPP, and Veron PS proteases) were also added to each microbial consortium. Consortium activity was evaluated by ELISA tests, RP-HPLC-nano-ESI–MS/MS, and duodenal explants from celiac disease patients. Results: two microbial consortia (Consortium 4: Lactiplantibacillus (Lp.) plantarum DSM33363 and DSM33364, Lacticaseibacillus (Lc.) paracasei DSM33373, Bacillus subtilis DSM33298, and Bacillus pumilus DSM33301; and Consortium 16: Lp. plantarum DSM33363 and DSM33364, Lc. paracasei DSM33373, Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM33374, Bacillus megaterium DSM33300, B. pumilus DSM33297 and DSM33355), containing commercial enzymes, were able to hydrolyze gluten to non-toxic and non-immunogenic peptides under gastrointestinal conditions. Conclusions: the results of this study provide evidence that selected microbial consortia could potentially improve the digestion of gluten in gluten-sensitive patients by hydrolyzing the immunogenic peptides during gastrointestinal digestion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8003469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80034692021-03-28 Selection of Gut-Resistant Bacteria and Construction of Microbial Consortia for Improving Gluten Digestion under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions De Angelis, Maria Siragusa, Sonya Vacca, Mirco Di Cagno, Raffaella Cristofori, Fernanda Schwarm, Michael Pelzer, Stefan Flügel, Monika Speckmann, Bodo Francavilla, Ruggiero Gobbetti, Marco Nutrients Article This work aimed to define the microbial consortia that are able to digest gluten into non-toxic and non-immunogenic peptides in the human gastrointestinal tract. Methods: 131 out of 504 tested Bacillus and lactic acid bacteria, specifically Bacillus (64), lactobacilli (63), Pediococcus (1), and Weissella (3), showed strong gastrointestinal resistance and were selected for their PepN, PepI, PepX, PepO, and PepP activities toward synthetic substrates. Based on multivariate analysis, 24 strains were clearly distinct from the other tested strains based on having the highest enzymatic activities. As estimated by RP-HPLC and nano-ESI–MS/MS, 6 cytoplasmic extracts out of 24 selected strains showed the ability to hydrolyze immunogenic epitopes, specifically 57–68 of α9-gliadin, 62–75 of A-gliadin, 134–153 of γ-gliadin, and 57–89 (33-mer) of α2-gliadin. Live and lysed cells of selected strains were combined into different microbial consortia for hydrolyzing gluten under gastrointestinal conditions. Commercial proteolytic enzymes (Aspergillus oryzae E1, Aspergillus niger E2, Bacillus subtilis Veron HPP, and Veron PS proteases) were also added to each microbial consortium. Consortium activity was evaluated by ELISA tests, RP-HPLC-nano-ESI–MS/MS, and duodenal explants from celiac disease patients. Results: two microbial consortia (Consortium 4: Lactiplantibacillus (Lp.) plantarum DSM33363 and DSM33364, Lacticaseibacillus (Lc.) paracasei DSM33373, Bacillus subtilis DSM33298, and Bacillus pumilus DSM33301; and Consortium 16: Lp. plantarum DSM33363 and DSM33364, Lc. paracasei DSM33373, Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM33374, Bacillus megaterium DSM33300, B. pumilus DSM33297 and DSM33355), containing commercial enzymes, were able to hydrolyze gluten to non-toxic and non-immunogenic peptides under gastrointestinal conditions. Conclusions: the results of this study provide evidence that selected microbial consortia could potentially improve the digestion of gluten in gluten-sensitive patients by hydrolyzing the immunogenic peptides during gastrointestinal digestion. MDPI 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8003469/ /pubmed/33808622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13030992 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
De Angelis, Maria
Siragusa, Sonya
Vacca, Mirco
Di Cagno, Raffaella
Cristofori, Fernanda
Schwarm, Michael
Pelzer, Stefan
Flügel, Monika
Speckmann, Bodo
Francavilla, Ruggiero
Gobbetti, Marco
Selection of Gut-Resistant Bacteria and Construction of Microbial Consortia for Improving Gluten Digestion under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions
title Selection of Gut-Resistant Bacteria and Construction of Microbial Consortia for Improving Gluten Digestion under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions
title_full Selection of Gut-Resistant Bacteria and Construction of Microbial Consortia for Improving Gluten Digestion under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions
title_fullStr Selection of Gut-Resistant Bacteria and Construction of Microbial Consortia for Improving Gluten Digestion under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Selection of Gut-Resistant Bacteria and Construction of Microbial Consortia for Improving Gluten Digestion under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions
title_short Selection of Gut-Resistant Bacteria and Construction of Microbial Consortia for Improving Gluten Digestion under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions
title_sort selection of gut-resistant bacteria and construction of microbial consortia for improving gluten digestion under simulated gastrointestinal conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13030992
work_keys_str_mv AT deangelismaria selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions
AT siragusasonya selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions
AT vaccamirco selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions
AT dicagnoraffaella selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions
AT cristoforifernanda selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions
AT schwarmmichael selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions
AT pelzerstefan selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions
AT flugelmonika selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions
AT speckmannbodo selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions
AT francavillaruggiero selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions
AT gobbettimarco selectionofgutresistantbacteriaandconstructionofmicrobialconsortiaforimprovingglutendigestionundersimulatedgastrointestinalconditions