Cargando…

Comparison of Volume-Guaranteed or -Targeted, Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

For perioperative mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia, modern respirators aim at combining the benefits of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in modes typically named “volume-guaranteed” or “volume-targeted” pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schick, Volker, Dusse, Fabian, Eckardt, Ronny, Kerkhoff, Steffen, Commotio, Simone, Hinkelbein, Jochen, Mathes, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061276
_version_ 1783671715360931840
author Schick, Volker
Dusse, Fabian
Eckardt, Ronny
Kerkhoff, Steffen
Commotio, Simone
Hinkelbein, Jochen
Mathes, Alexander
author_facet Schick, Volker
Dusse, Fabian
Eckardt, Ronny
Kerkhoff, Steffen
Commotio, Simone
Hinkelbein, Jochen
Mathes, Alexander
author_sort Schick, Volker
collection PubMed
description For perioperative mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia, modern respirators aim at combining the benefits of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in modes typically named “volume-guaranteed” or “volume-targeted” pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV-VG). This systematic review and meta-analysis tested the hypothesis that PCV-VG modes of ventilation could be beneficial in terms of improved airway pressures (P(peak), P(plateau), P(mean)), dynamic compliance (C(dyn)), or arterial blood gases (P(a)O(2), P(a)CO(2)) in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Three major medical electronic databases were searched with predefined search strategies and publications were systematically evaluated according to the Cochrane Review Methods. Continuous variables were tested for mean differences using the inverse variance method and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Based on the assumption that intervention effects across studies were not identical, a random effects model was chosen. Assessment for heterogeneity was performed with the χ(2) test and the I(2) statistic. As primary endpoints, P(peak), P(plateau), P(mean), C(dyn), P(a)O(2), and P(a)CO(2) were evaluated. Of the 725 publications identified, 17 finally met eligibility criteria, with a total of 929 patients recruited. Under supine two-lung ventilation, PCV-VG resulted in significantly reduced P(peak) (15 studies) and P(plateau) (9 studies) as well as higher C(dyn) (9 studies), compared with VCV [random effects models; P(peak): CI −3.26 to −1.47; p < 0.001; I(2) = 82%; P(plateau): −3.12 to −0.12; p = 0.03; I(2) = 90%; C(dyn): CI 3.42 to 8.65; p < 0.001; I(2) = 90%]. For one-lung ventilation (8 studies), PCV-VG allowed for significantly lower P(peak) and higher P(a)O(2) compared with VCV. In Trendelenburg position (5 studies), this effect was significant for P(peak) only. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that volume-targeting, pressure-controlled ventilation modes may provide benefits with respect to the improved airway dynamics in two- and one-lung ventilation, and improved oxygenation in one-lung ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8003546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80035462021-03-28 Comparison of Volume-Guaranteed or -Targeted, Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Schick, Volker Dusse, Fabian Eckardt, Ronny Kerkhoff, Steffen Commotio, Simone Hinkelbein, Jochen Mathes, Alexander J Clin Med Review For perioperative mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia, modern respirators aim at combining the benefits of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in modes typically named “volume-guaranteed” or “volume-targeted” pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV-VG). This systematic review and meta-analysis tested the hypothesis that PCV-VG modes of ventilation could be beneficial in terms of improved airway pressures (P(peak), P(plateau), P(mean)), dynamic compliance (C(dyn)), or arterial blood gases (P(a)O(2), P(a)CO(2)) in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Three major medical electronic databases were searched with predefined search strategies and publications were systematically evaluated according to the Cochrane Review Methods. Continuous variables were tested for mean differences using the inverse variance method and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Based on the assumption that intervention effects across studies were not identical, a random effects model was chosen. Assessment for heterogeneity was performed with the χ(2) test and the I(2) statistic. As primary endpoints, P(peak), P(plateau), P(mean), C(dyn), P(a)O(2), and P(a)CO(2) were evaluated. Of the 725 publications identified, 17 finally met eligibility criteria, with a total of 929 patients recruited. Under supine two-lung ventilation, PCV-VG resulted in significantly reduced P(peak) (15 studies) and P(plateau) (9 studies) as well as higher C(dyn) (9 studies), compared with VCV [random effects models; P(peak): CI −3.26 to −1.47; p < 0.001; I(2) = 82%; P(plateau): −3.12 to −0.12; p = 0.03; I(2) = 90%; C(dyn): CI 3.42 to 8.65; p < 0.001; I(2) = 90%]. For one-lung ventilation (8 studies), PCV-VG allowed for significantly lower P(peak) and higher P(a)O(2) compared with VCV. In Trendelenburg position (5 studies), this effect was significant for P(peak) only. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that volume-targeting, pressure-controlled ventilation modes may provide benefits with respect to the improved airway dynamics in two- and one-lung ventilation, and improved oxygenation in one-lung ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery. MDPI 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8003546/ /pubmed/33808607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061276 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Schick, Volker
Dusse, Fabian
Eckardt, Ronny
Kerkhoff, Steffen
Commotio, Simone
Hinkelbein, Jochen
Mathes, Alexander
Comparison of Volume-Guaranteed or -Targeted, Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of Volume-Guaranteed or -Targeted, Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Volume-Guaranteed or -Targeted, Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Volume-Guaranteed or -Targeted, Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Volume-Guaranteed or -Targeted, Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Volume-Guaranteed or -Targeted, Pressure-Controlled Ventilation with Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of volume-guaranteed or -targeted, pressure-controlled ventilation with volume-controlled ventilation during elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10061276
work_keys_str_mv AT schickvolker comparisonofvolumeguaranteedortargetedpressurecontrolledventilationwithvolumecontrolledventilationduringelectivesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dussefabian comparisonofvolumeguaranteedortargetedpressurecontrolledventilationwithvolumecontrolledventilationduringelectivesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eckardtronny comparisonofvolumeguaranteedortargetedpressurecontrolledventilationwithvolumecontrolledventilationduringelectivesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kerkhoffsteffen comparisonofvolumeguaranteedortargetedpressurecontrolledventilationwithvolumecontrolledventilationduringelectivesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT commotiosimone comparisonofvolumeguaranteedortargetedpressurecontrolledventilationwithvolumecontrolledventilationduringelectivesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hinkelbeinjochen comparisonofvolumeguaranteedortargetedpressurecontrolledventilationwithvolumecontrolledventilationduringelectivesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mathesalexander comparisonofvolumeguaranteedortargetedpressurecontrolledventilationwithvolumecontrolledventilationduringelectivesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis