Cargando…

Comparison of Coated and Immobilized Chiral Stationary Phases Based on Amylose tris-[(S)-α-Methylbenzylcarbamate] for the HPLC Enantiomer Separation of α-Lipoic Acid and Its Reduced Form

The couple of chiral sulfur compounds α-lipoic acid (ALA)/α-dihydrolipoic acid (DHALA) has attracted considerable attention in recent years owing to its remarkable anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. It is well known that the chirality of the C6 plays a key role in determining the biologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosetti, Alessia, Villani, Claudio, Pierini, Marco, Cirilli, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33804678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061747
_version_ 1783671758610497536
author Rosetti, Alessia
Villani, Claudio
Pierini, Marco
Cirilli, Roberto
author_facet Rosetti, Alessia
Villani, Claudio
Pierini, Marco
Cirilli, Roberto
author_sort Rosetti, Alessia
collection PubMed
description The couple of chiral sulfur compounds α-lipoic acid (ALA)/α-dihydrolipoic acid (DHALA) has attracted considerable attention in recent years owing to its remarkable anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. It is well known that the chirality of the C6 plays a key role in determining the biological activity of ALA. The natural occurring (R)-ALA enantiomer is an essential cofactor for key oxidative metabolism enzyme complexes and, after oral administration of the racemic mixture, it shows higher plasma concentration than (S)-ALA. Differently, the in vivo enantioselective action difference between the enantiomers of DHALA has not yet been studied. This lacking is perhaps due to the unavailability of analytical methods capable of determining the enantiomeric composition of biological samples during pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic events. In the present work, the direct and baseline enantioresolution of both chiral acids by HPLC on two amylose-derived chiral stationary phases is presented. The proposed chiral enantioselective protocol, therefore, does not require pre- or on-column derivatization. The performance of the coated Chiralpak AS-H CSP and the new immobilized Chiralpak IH-3 CSP, which have the same chiral selector amylose tris-[(S)-α-methylbenzylcarbamate], were compared using conventional normal-phase mobile phases containing ethanol or 2-propanol as alcoholic solvents and a fixed percentage of trifluoroacetic acid. Nonconventional eluents containing dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran as organic cosolvents were applied in the separation of the enantiomers of two carboxylic acids on the immobilized Chiralpak IH-3 CSP. The effect of the column temperature was carefully evaluated in order to improve enantioselectivity. Adequate amounts of enantiomers were isolated by an analytical-size Chiralpak IH-3 column and submitted to chiroptical measurements. The absolute configuration assignment of the isolated enantiomers was determined by a multidisciplinary procedure based on the comparison of the experimental and calculated chiroptical properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8003731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80037312021-03-28 Comparison of Coated and Immobilized Chiral Stationary Phases Based on Amylose tris-[(S)-α-Methylbenzylcarbamate] for the HPLC Enantiomer Separation of α-Lipoic Acid and Its Reduced Form Rosetti, Alessia Villani, Claudio Pierini, Marco Cirilli, Roberto Molecules Article The couple of chiral sulfur compounds α-lipoic acid (ALA)/α-dihydrolipoic acid (DHALA) has attracted considerable attention in recent years owing to its remarkable anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. It is well known that the chirality of the C6 plays a key role in determining the biological activity of ALA. The natural occurring (R)-ALA enantiomer is an essential cofactor for key oxidative metabolism enzyme complexes and, after oral administration of the racemic mixture, it shows higher plasma concentration than (S)-ALA. Differently, the in vivo enantioselective action difference between the enantiomers of DHALA has not yet been studied. This lacking is perhaps due to the unavailability of analytical methods capable of determining the enantiomeric composition of biological samples during pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic events. In the present work, the direct and baseline enantioresolution of both chiral acids by HPLC on two amylose-derived chiral stationary phases is presented. The proposed chiral enantioselective protocol, therefore, does not require pre- or on-column derivatization. The performance of the coated Chiralpak AS-H CSP and the new immobilized Chiralpak IH-3 CSP, which have the same chiral selector amylose tris-[(S)-α-methylbenzylcarbamate], were compared using conventional normal-phase mobile phases containing ethanol or 2-propanol as alcoholic solvents and a fixed percentage of trifluoroacetic acid. Nonconventional eluents containing dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran as organic cosolvents were applied in the separation of the enantiomers of two carboxylic acids on the immobilized Chiralpak IH-3 CSP. The effect of the column temperature was carefully evaluated in order to improve enantioselectivity. Adequate amounts of enantiomers were isolated by an analytical-size Chiralpak IH-3 column and submitted to chiroptical measurements. The absolute configuration assignment of the isolated enantiomers was determined by a multidisciplinary procedure based on the comparison of the experimental and calculated chiroptical properties. MDPI 2021-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8003731/ /pubmed/33804678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061747 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rosetti, Alessia
Villani, Claudio
Pierini, Marco
Cirilli, Roberto
Comparison of Coated and Immobilized Chiral Stationary Phases Based on Amylose tris-[(S)-α-Methylbenzylcarbamate] for the HPLC Enantiomer Separation of α-Lipoic Acid and Its Reduced Form
title Comparison of Coated and Immobilized Chiral Stationary Phases Based on Amylose tris-[(S)-α-Methylbenzylcarbamate] for the HPLC Enantiomer Separation of α-Lipoic Acid and Its Reduced Form
title_full Comparison of Coated and Immobilized Chiral Stationary Phases Based on Amylose tris-[(S)-α-Methylbenzylcarbamate] for the HPLC Enantiomer Separation of α-Lipoic Acid and Its Reduced Form
title_fullStr Comparison of Coated and Immobilized Chiral Stationary Phases Based on Amylose tris-[(S)-α-Methylbenzylcarbamate] for the HPLC Enantiomer Separation of α-Lipoic Acid and Its Reduced Form
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Coated and Immobilized Chiral Stationary Phases Based on Amylose tris-[(S)-α-Methylbenzylcarbamate] for the HPLC Enantiomer Separation of α-Lipoic Acid and Its Reduced Form
title_short Comparison of Coated and Immobilized Chiral Stationary Phases Based on Amylose tris-[(S)-α-Methylbenzylcarbamate] for the HPLC Enantiomer Separation of α-Lipoic Acid and Its Reduced Form
title_sort comparison of coated and immobilized chiral stationary phases based on amylose tris-[(s)-α-methylbenzylcarbamate] for the hplc enantiomer separation of α-lipoic acid and its reduced form
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33804678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26061747
work_keys_str_mv AT rosettialessia comparisonofcoatedandimmobilizedchiralstationaryphasesbasedonamylosetrissamethylbenzylcarbamateforthehplcenantiomerseparationofalipoicacidanditsreducedform
AT villaniclaudio comparisonofcoatedandimmobilizedchiralstationaryphasesbasedonamylosetrissamethylbenzylcarbamateforthehplcenantiomerseparationofalipoicacidanditsreducedform
AT pierinimarco comparisonofcoatedandimmobilizedchiralstationaryphasesbasedonamylosetrissamethylbenzylcarbamateforthehplcenantiomerseparationofalipoicacidanditsreducedform
AT cirilliroberto comparisonofcoatedandimmobilizedchiralstationaryphasesbasedonamylosetrissamethylbenzylcarbamateforthehplcenantiomerseparationofalipoicacidanditsreducedform