Cargando…

Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The prevalence of neural autoantibodies in epilepsy of unknown etiology varies among studies. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled global prevalence and the prevalence for each antibody. Methods: A systematic search was conducted for studies t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabezudo-García, Pablo, Mena-Vázquez, Natalia, Ciano-Petersen, Nicolás L., García-Martín, Guillermina, Estivill-Torrús, Guillermo, Serrano-Castro, Pedro J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808902
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030392
_version_ 1783671759973646336
author Cabezudo-García, Pablo
Mena-Vázquez, Natalia
Ciano-Petersen, Nicolás L.
García-Martín, Guillermina
Estivill-Torrús, Guillermo
Serrano-Castro, Pedro J.
author_facet Cabezudo-García, Pablo
Mena-Vázquez, Natalia
Ciano-Petersen, Nicolás L.
García-Martín, Guillermina
Estivill-Torrús, Guillermo
Serrano-Castro, Pedro J.
author_sort Cabezudo-García, Pablo
collection PubMed
description Background: The prevalence of neural autoantibodies in epilepsy of unknown etiology varies among studies. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled global prevalence and the prevalence for each antibody. Methods: A systematic search was conducted for studies that included prospectively patients ≥16 years old with epilepsy of unknown etiology and systematically determined neural autoantibodies. A meta-analysis was undertaken to estimate pooled prevalence in total patients with a positive result for at least one neural autoantibody in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and for each autoantibody. Results: Ten of the eleven studies that met the inclusion criteria and a total of 1302 patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology were included in themeta-analysis. The global pooled prevalence (IC95%) was 7.6% (4.6–11.2) in a total of 82 patients with a positive result for any neural autoantibody. None of the controls available in the studies had a positive result. Individual pooled prevalence for each autoantibody was: glycine receptor (GlyR) (3.2%), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) (1.9%), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) (1.8%), leucine-rich glioma inactivated-1 protein (LGI1) (1.1%), contactin-2-associated protein (CASPR2) (0.6%) and onconeuronal (0.2%). Conclusions: The pooled prevalence of neural autoantibodies in patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology is small but not irrelevant. None of the controls had a positive result. There was high heterogeneity among studies. In the future, a homogeneous protocol for testing neural autoantibodies is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8003737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80037372021-03-28 Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Cabezudo-García, Pablo Mena-Vázquez, Natalia Ciano-Petersen, Nicolás L. García-Martín, Guillermina Estivill-Torrús, Guillermo Serrano-Castro, Pedro J. Brain Sci Review Background: The prevalence of neural autoantibodies in epilepsy of unknown etiology varies among studies. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled global prevalence and the prevalence for each antibody. Methods: A systematic search was conducted for studies that included prospectively patients ≥16 years old with epilepsy of unknown etiology and systematically determined neural autoantibodies. A meta-analysis was undertaken to estimate pooled prevalence in total patients with a positive result for at least one neural autoantibody in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and for each autoantibody. Results: Ten of the eleven studies that met the inclusion criteria and a total of 1302 patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology were included in themeta-analysis. The global pooled prevalence (IC95%) was 7.6% (4.6–11.2) in a total of 82 patients with a positive result for any neural autoantibody. None of the controls available in the studies had a positive result. Individual pooled prevalence for each autoantibody was: glycine receptor (GlyR) (3.2%), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) (1.9%), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) (1.8%), leucine-rich glioma inactivated-1 protein (LGI1) (1.1%), contactin-2-associated protein (CASPR2) (0.6%) and onconeuronal (0.2%). Conclusions: The pooled prevalence of neural autoantibodies in patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology is small but not irrelevant. None of the controls had a positive result. There was high heterogeneity among studies. In the future, a homogeneous protocol for testing neural autoantibodies is recommended. MDPI 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8003737/ /pubmed/33808902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030392 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Review
Cabezudo-García, Pablo
Mena-Vázquez, Natalia
Ciano-Petersen, Nicolás L.
García-Martín, Guillermina
Estivill-Torrús, Guillermo
Serrano-Castro, Pedro J.
Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort prevalence of neural autoantibodies in epilepsy of unknown etiology: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808902
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030392
work_keys_str_mv AT cabezudogarciapablo prevalenceofneuralautoantibodiesinepilepsyofunknownetiologysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT menavazqueznatalia prevalenceofneuralautoantibodiesinepilepsyofunknownetiologysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cianopetersennicolasl prevalenceofneuralautoantibodiesinepilepsyofunknownetiologysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT garciamartinguillermina prevalenceofneuralautoantibodiesinepilepsyofunknownetiologysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT estivilltorrusguillermo prevalenceofneuralautoantibodiesinepilepsyofunknownetiologysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT serranocastropedroj prevalenceofneuralautoantibodiesinepilepsyofunknownetiologysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis