Cargando…

Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study

The aim of this in vitro study was to determine whether the process chain influences the accuracy of a computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedure. Four different data integration workflows using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), conventional impressions, and intraoral digitization with and w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnutenhaus, Sigmar, Knipper, Anne, Wetzel, Martin, Edelmann, Cornelia, Luthardt, Ralph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063244
_version_ 1783671806292393984
author Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
Knipper, Anne
Wetzel, Martin
Edelmann, Cornelia
Luthardt, Ralph
author_facet Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
Knipper, Anne
Wetzel, Martin
Edelmann, Cornelia
Luthardt, Ralph
author_sort Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
collection PubMed
description The aim of this in vitro study was to determine whether the process chain influences the accuracy of a computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedure. Four different data integration workflows using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), conventional impressions, and intraoral digitization with and without reference markers were analyzed. Digital implant planning was conducted using data from the CBCT scans and 3D data of the oral models. The restoration of the free end of the lower jaw was simulated. Fifteen models were each implanted with two new teeth for each process chain. The models were then scanned with scan bodies screwed onto the implants. The deviations between the planned and achieved implant positions were determined. The evaluation of all 120 implants resulted in a mean angular deviation of 2.88 ± 2.03°. The mean 3D deviation at the implant shoulder was 1.53 ± 0.70 mm. No significant differences were found between the implant regions. In contrast, the workflow showed significant differences in various parameters. The position of the reference marker affected the accuracy of the implant position. The in vitro examination showed that precise implantation is possible with the dynamic navigation system used in this study. The results are of the same order of magnitude that can be achieved using static navigation methods. Clinical studies are yet to confirm the results of this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8003934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80039342021-03-28 Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study Schnutenhaus, Sigmar Knipper, Anne Wetzel, Martin Edelmann, Cornelia Luthardt, Ralph Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of this in vitro study was to determine whether the process chain influences the accuracy of a computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedure. Four different data integration workflows using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), conventional impressions, and intraoral digitization with and without reference markers were analyzed. Digital implant planning was conducted using data from the CBCT scans and 3D data of the oral models. The restoration of the free end of the lower jaw was simulated. Fifteen models were each implanted with two new teeth for each process chain. The models were then scanned with scan bodies screwed onto the implants. The deviations between the planned and achieved implant positions were determined. The evaluation of all 120 implants resulted in a mean angular deviation of 2.88 ± 2.03°. The mean 3D deviation at the implant shoulder was 1.53 ± 0.70 mm. No significant differences were found between the implant regions. In contrast, the workflow showed significant differences in various parameters. The position of the reference marker affected the accuracy of the implant position. The in vitro examination showed that precise implantation is possible with the dynamic navigation system used in this study. The results are of the same order of magnitude that can be achieved using static navigation methods. Clinical studies are yet to confirm the results of this study. MDPI 2021-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8003934/ /pubmed/33801039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063244 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
Knipper, Anne
Wetzel, Martin
Edelmann, Cornelia
Luthardt, Ralph
Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study
title Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study
title_full Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study
title_short Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study
title_sort accuracy of computer-assisted dynamic navigation as a function of different intraoral reference systems: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063244
work_keys_str_mv AT schnutenhaussigmar accuracyofcomputerassisteddynamicnavigationasafunctionofdifferentintraoralreferencesystemsaninvitrostudy
AT knipperanne accuracyofcomputerassisteddynamicnavigationasafunctionofdifferentintraoralreferencesystemsaninvitrostudy
AT wetzelmartin accuracyofcomputerassisteddynamicnavigationasafunctionofdifferentintraoralreferencesystemsaninvitrostudy
AT edelmanncornelia accuracyofcomputerassisteddynamicnavigationasafunctionofdifferentintraoralreferencesystemsaninvitrostudy
AT luthardtralph accuracyofcomputerassisteddynamicnavigationasafunctionofdifferentintraoralreferencesystemsaninvitrostudy