Cargando…

Response Surface Method Analysis of Chemically Stabilized Fiber-Reinforced Soil

One of the significant issues persisting in the study of soil stabilization is the establishment of the optimum proportions of the quantity of stabilizer to be added to the soil. Determining optimum solutions or the most feasible remedies for the utilization of stabilizing products in terms of their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almajed, Abdullah, Srirama, Dinesh, Moghal, Arif Ali Baig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801040
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14061535
_version_ 1783671811036151808
author Almajed, Abdullah
Srirama, Dinesh
Moghal, Arif Ali Baig
author_facet Almajed, Abdullah
Srirama, Dinesh
Moghal, Arif Ali Baig
author_sort Almajed, Abdullah
collection PubMed
description One of the significant issues persisting in the study of soil stabilization is the establishment of the optimum proportions of the quantity of stabilizer to be added to the soil. Determining optimum solutions or the most feasible remedies for the utilization of stabilizing products in terms of their dose rates has become a significant concern in major civil engineering design projects. Using the response surface methodology, this study primarily focused on investigating the optimal levels of reinforcement fiber length (FL), fiber dosage (FD), and curing time (CT) for geotechnical parameters of stabilized soil. To realize this objective, an experimental study was undertaken on the California bearing ratio (CBR) and unconfined compressive strength (UCS). Hydraulic conductivity (HC) tests were also performed, with stabilizer proportions of 6–12 mm for the FL and 0.2–0.6% for the FD calculated for the total dry weight of soil and 6% lime (total weight of dry soil). The curing times used for testing were 0, 7, and 14 days for the CBR tests; 60, 210, and 360 days for the UCS tests; and 7, 17, and 28 days for the HC tests. All practical experiments were conducted with experimental techniques using stabilizer proportions and curing times. The FL, FD, CT, CBR, UCS, and HC response factors were determined using the central composite design. The results point toward a statistically significant model constructed (p ≤ 0.05) using the analysis of variance. The results from this optimization procedure show that the optimal values for the FL, FD, and CT were 11.1 mm, 0.5%, and 13.2 days, respectively, as these provided the maximum values for the CBR; 11.7 mm for the FL, 0.3% for the FD, and 160 days for the CT corresponded to the maximum values for the UCS; and 10.5 mm for the FL, 0.5% for the FD, and 15 days for the CT led to the minimum value for the HC. In practice, the suggested values may be useful for experiments, especially for preliminary assessments prior to stabilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8003954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80039542021-03-28 Response Surface Method Analysis of Chemically Stabilized Fiber-Reinforced Soil Almajed, Abdullah Srirama, Dinesh Moghal, Arif Ali Baig Materials (Basel) Article One of the significant issues persisting in the study of soil stabilization is the establishment of the optimum proportions of the quantity of stabilizer to be added to the soil. Determining optimum solutions or the most feasible remedies for the utilization of stabilizing products in terms of their dose rates has become a significant concern in major civil engineering design projects. Using the response surface methodology, this study primarily focused on investigating the optimal levels of reinforcement fiber length (FL), fiber dosage (FD), and curing time (CT) for geotechnical parameters of stabilized soil. To realize this objective, an experimental study was undertaken on the California bearing ratio (CBR) and unconfined compressive strength (UCS). Hydraulic conductivity (HC) tests were also performed, with stabilizer proportions of 6–12 mm for the FL and 0.2–0.6% for the FD calculated for the total dry weight of soil and 6% lime (total weight of dry soil). The curing times used for testing were 0, 7, and 14 days for the CBR tests; 60, 210, and 360 days for the UCS tests; and 7, 17, and 28 days for the HC tests. All practical experiments were conducted with experimental techniques using stabilizer proportions and curing times. The FL, FD, CT, CBR, UCS, and HC response factors were determined using the central composite design. The results point toward a statistically significant model constructed (p ≤ 0.05) using the analysis of variance. The results from this optimization procedure show that the optimal values for the FL, FD, and CT were 11.1 mm, 0.5%, and 13.2 days, respectively, as these provided the maximum values for the CBR; 11.7 mm for the FL, 0.3% for the FD, and 160 days for the CT corresponded to the maximum values for the UCS; and 10.5 mm for the FL, 0.5% for the FD, and 15 days for the CT led to the minimum value for the HC. In practice, the suggested values may be useful for experiments, especially for preliminary assessments prior to stabilization. MDPI 2021-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8003954/ /pubmed/33801040 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14061535 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Almajed, Abdullah
Srirama, Dinesh
Moghal, Arif Ali Baig
Response Surface Method Analysis of Chemically Stabilized Fiber-Reinforced Soil
title Response Surface Method Analysis of Chemically Stabilized Fiber-Reinforced Soil
title_full Response Surface Method Analysis of Chemically Stabilized Fiber-Reinforced Soil
title_fullStr Response Surface Method Analysis of Chemically Stabilized Fiber-Reinforced Soil
title_full_unstemmed Response Surface Method Analysis of Chemically Stabilized Fiber-Reinforced Soil
title_short Response Surface Method Analysis of Chemically Stabilized Fiber-Reinforced Soil
title_sort response surface method analysis of chemically stabilized fiber-reinforced soil
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801040
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14061535
work_keys_str_mv AT almajedabdullah responsesurfacemethodanalysisofchemicallystabilizedfiberreinforcedsoil
AT sriramadinesh responsesurfacemethodanalysisofchemicallystabilizedfiberreinforcedsoil
AT moghalarifalibaig responsesurfacemethodanalysisofchemicallystabilizedfiberreinforcedsoil