Cargando…
Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy
BACKGROUND: Microdiscectomy is the most commonly performed spine surgery and the first transitioning for outpatient settings. However, this transition was never studied, in what comes to cost-utility assessment. Accordingly, this economic study aims to access the cost-effectiveness of outpatient lum...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00272-w |
_version_ | 1783671900187131904 |
---|---|
author | Linhares, Daniela Fonseca, João A. Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel Conceição, Filipe Sousa, António Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo Neves, Nuno |
author_facet | Linhares, Daniela Fonseca, João A. Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel Conceição, Filipe Sousa, António Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo Neves, Nuno |
author_sort | Linhares, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microdiscectomy is the most commonly performed spine surgery and the first transitioning for outpatient settings. However, this transition was never studied, in what comes to cost-utility assessment. Accordingly, this economic study aims to access the cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy when compared with the inpatient procedure. METHODS: This is a cost utility study, adopting the hospital perspective. Direct medical costs were retrieved from the assessment of 20 patients undergoing outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy and 20 undergoing inpatient lumbar microdiscectomy Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from Oswestry Disability Index values (ODI). ODI was prospectively assessed in outpatients in pre and 3- and 6-month post-operative evaluations. Inpatient ODI data were estimated from a meta-analysis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated. RESULTS: Outpatient procedure was cost-saving in all models tested. At 3-month assessment ICER ranged from €135,753 to €345,755/QALY, higher than the predefined threshold of €60,000/QALY gained. At 6-month costs were lower and utilities were higher in outpatient, overpowering the inpatient procedure. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that in 65% to 73% of simulations outpatient was the better option. The savings with outpatient were about 55% of inpatient values, with similar utility scores. No 30-day readmissions were recorded in either group. CONCLUSION: This is the first economic study on cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy, showing a significant reduction in costs, with a similar clinical outcome, proving it cost-effective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-021-00272-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8004396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80043962021-03-30 Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy Linhares, Daniela Fonseca, João A. Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel Conceição, Filipe Sousa, António Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo Neves, Nuno Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Microdiscectomy is the most commonly performed spine surgery and the first transitioning for outpatient settings. However, this transition was never studied, in what comes to cost-utility assessment. Accordingly, this economic study aims to access the cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy when compared with the inpatient procedure. METHODS: This is a cost utility study, adopting the hospital perspective. Direct medical costs were retrieved from the assessment of 20 patients undergoing outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy and 20 undergoing inpatient lumbar microdiscectomy Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from Oswestry Disability Index values (ODI). ODI was prospectively assessed in outpatients in pre and 3- and 6-month post-operative evaluations. Inpatient ODI data were estimated from a meta-analysis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated. RESULTS: Outpatient procedure was cost-saving in all models tested. At 3-month assessment ICER ranged from €135,753 to €345,755/QALY, higher than the predefined threshold of €60,000/QALY gained. At 6-month costs were lower and utilities were higher in outpatient, overpowering the inpatient procedure. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that in 65% to 73% of simulations outpatient was the better option. The savings with outpatient were about 55% of inpatient values, with similar utility scores. No 30-day readmissions were recorded in either group. CONCLUSION: This is the first economic study on cost-effectiveness of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy, showing a significant reduction in costs, with a similar clinical outcome, proving it cost-effective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-021-00272-w. BioMed Central 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8004396/ /pubmed/33771175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00272-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Linhares, Daniela Fonseca, João A. Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel Conceição, Filipe Sousa, António Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo Neves, Nuno Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy |
title | Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy |
title_full | Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy |
title_fullStr | Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy |
title_short | Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy |
title_sort | cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00272-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linharesdaniela costeffectivenessofoutpatientlumbardiscectomy AT fonsecajoaoa costeffectivenessofoutpatientlumbardiscectomy AT ribeirodasilvamanuel costeffectivenessofoutpatientlumbardiscectomy AT conceicaofilipe costeffectivenessofoutpatientlumbardiscectomy AT sousaantonio costeffectivenessofoutpatientlumbardiscectomy AT sousapintobernardo costeffectivenessofoutpatientlumbardiscectomy AT nevesnuno costeffectivenessofoutpatientlumbardiscectomy |