Cargando…

Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Homonymous visual field defects represent the most frequent type of visual field loss after stroke, affecting nearly 30% of individuals with unilateral post-chiasmal brain damage. This review aimed to gather the available evidence on the biomechanical changes to visual field loss followi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elfeky, Adel, D’Août, Kristiaan, Lawson, Rebecca, Hepworth, Lauren R., Thomas, Nicholas D. A., Clynch, Abigail, Rowe, Fiona J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4
_version_ 1783671907499900928
author Elfeky, Adel
D’Août, Kristiaan
Lawson, Rebecca
Hepworth, Lauren R.
Thomas, Nicholas D. A.
Clynch, Abigail
Rowe, Fiona J.
author_facet Elfeky, Adel
D’Août, Kristiaan
Lawson, Rebecca
Hepworth, Lauren R.
Thomas, Nicholas D. A.
Clynch, Abigail
Rowe, Fiona J.
author_sort Elfeky, Adel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Homonymous visual field defects represent the most frequent type of visual field loss after stroke, affecting nearly 30% of individuals with unilateral post-chiasmal brain damage. This review aimed to gather the available evidence on the biomechanical changes to visual field loss following stroke. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted inclusive of randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, before-after studies and case-controlled studies. Studies including adult and paediatric participants that investigated eye, head, or body movements in post-stroke visual field loss during visual exploration tasks were included. Search terms included a range of MESH terms as well as alternative terms relating to stroke, visual field loss, hemianopia, visual functions and scanning behaviour. Articles were selected by two authors independently. Data were extracted by one author and verified by a second. All included articles were assessed for risk of bias using checklists appropriate to the study design. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles (1123 participants) were included in the overall review (Kappa 0.863) and categorised into simulated or true visual field loss (typically hemianopia). Seven studies identified the biomechanical alterations to simulated hemianopia compared to normal performance. Twenty-nine studies detailed eye, head and body movement parameters in true hemianopia. Hemianopic participants and healthy adults with simulated hemianopia differed significantly from controls in various fixation and saccade parameters as indicated by increased number and duration of fixations, number and duration of saccades and scan path length with shorter mean saccadic amplitude. Under simulated hemianopia, participants were consistently biased towards the sighted visual field while gaze behaviour in true hemianopia was biased in the direction of the blind hemifield. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable evidence on the altered eye movements that occur in true hemianopia and in healthy adults with simulated hemianopia. Successful performance in naturalistic tasks of visual exploration appears to be related to compensatory mechanisms of visual exploratory behaviour, namely, an increase in the amplitude and peak velocity of saccades, widening horizontally the distribution of eye movements, and a shift of the overall distribution of saccades into the blind field. This review highlights the lack of studies reporting head and other body movement parameters in hemianopia. Further studies with robust methodology and large sample sizes involving participants with post-stroke visual field loss are needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020194403 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8004433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80044332021-03-30 Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review Elfeky, Adel D’Août, Kristiaan Lawson, Rebecca Hepworth, Lauren R. Thomas, Nicholas D. A. Clynch, Abigail Rowe, Fiona J. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Homonymous visual field defects represent the most frequent type of visual field loss after stroke, affecting nearly 30% of individuals with unilateral post-chiasmal brain damage. This review aimed to gather the available evidence on the biomechanical changes to visual field loss following stroke. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted inclusive of randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, before-after studies and case-controlled studies. Studies including adult and paediatric participants that investigated eye, head, or body movements in post-stroke visual field loss during visual exploration tasks were included. Search terms included a range of MESH terms as well as alternative terms relating to stroke, visual field loss, hemianopia, visual functions and scanning behaviour. Articles were selected by two authors independently. Data were extracted by one author and verified by a second. All included articles were assessed for risk of bias using checklists appropriate to the study design. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles (1123 participants) were included in the overall review (Kappa 0.863) and categorised into simulated or true visual field loss (typically hemianopia). Seven studies identified the biomechanical alterations to simulated hemianopia compared to normal performance. Twenty-nine studies detailed eye, head and body movement parameters in true hemianopia. Hemianopic participants and healthy adults with simulated hemianopia differed significantly from controls in various fixation and saccade parameters as indicated by increased number and duration of fixations, number and duration of saccades and scan path length with shorter mean saccadic amplitude. Under simulated hemianopia, participants were consistently biased towards the sighted visual field while gaze behaviour in true hemianopia was biased in the direction of the blind hemifield. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable evidence on the altered eye movements that occur in true hemianopia and in healthy adults with simulated hemianopia. Successful performance in naturalistic tasks of visual exploration appears to be related to compensatory mechanisms of visual exploratory behaviour, namely, an increase in the amplitude and peak velocity of saccades, widening horizontally the distribution of eye movements, and a shift of the overall distribution of saccades into the blind field. This review highlights the lack of studies reporting head and other body movement parameters in hemianopia. Further studies with robust methodology and large sample sizes involving participants with post-stroke visual field loss are needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020194403 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4. BioMed Central 2021-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8004433/ /pubmed/33771214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Elfeky, Adel
D’Août, Kristiaan
Lawson, Rebecca
Hepworth, Lauren R.
Thomas, Nicholas D. A.
Clynch, Abigail
Rowe, Fiona J.
Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review
title Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review
title_full Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review
title_fullStr Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review
title_short Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review
title_sort biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4
work_keys_str_mv AT elfekyadel biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview
AT daoutkristiaan biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview
AT lawsonrebecca biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview
AT hepworthlaurenr biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview
AT thomasnicholasda biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview
AT clynchabigail biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview
AT rowefionaj biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview