Cargando…
Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Homonymous visual field defects represent the most frequent type of visual field loss after stroke, affecting nearly 30% of individuals with unilateral post-chiasmal brain damage. This review aimed to gather the available evidence on the biomechanical changes to visual field loss followi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4 |
_version_ | 1783671907499900928 |
---|---|
author | Elfeky, Adel D’Août, Kristiaan Lawson, Rebecca Hepworth, Lauren R. Thomas, Nicholas D. A. Clynch, Abigail Rowe, Fiona J. |
author_facet | Elfeky, Adel D’Août, Kristiaan Lawson, Rebecca Hepworth, Lauren R. Thomas, Nicholas D. A. Clynch, Abigail Rowe, Fiona J. |
author_sort | Elfeky, Adel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Homonymous visual field defects represent the most frequent type of visual field loss after stroke, affecting nearly 30% of individuals with unilateral post-chiasmal brain damage. This review aimed to gather the available evidence on the biomechanical changes to visual field loss following stroke. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted inclusive of randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, before-after studies and case-controlled studies. Studies including adult and paediatric participants that investigated eye, head, or body movements in post-stroke visual field loss during visual exploration tasks were included. Search terms included a range of MESH terms as well as alternative terms relating to stroke, visual field loss, hemianopia, visual functions and scanning behaviour. Articles were selected by two authors independently. Data were extracted by one author and verified by a second. All included articles were assessed for risk of bias using checklists appropriate to the study design. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles (1123 participants) were included in the overall review (Kappa 0.863) and categorised into simulated or true visual field loss (typically hemianopia). Seven studies identified the biomechanical alterations to simulated hemianopia compared to normal performance. Twenty-nine studies detailed eye, head and body movement parameters in true hemianopia. Hemianopic participants and healthy adults with simulated hemianopia differed significantly from controls in various fixation and saccade parameters as indicated by increased number and duration of fixations, number and duration of saccades and scan path length with shorter mean saccadic amplitude. Under simulated hemianopia, participants were consistently biased towards the sighted visual field while gaze behaviour in true hemianopia was biased in the direction of the blind hemifield. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable evidence on the altered eye movements that occur in true hemianopia and in healthy adults with simulated hemianopia. Successful performance in naturalistic tasks of visual exploration appears to be related to compensatory mechanisms of visual exploratory behaviour, namely, an increase in the amplitude and peak velocity of saccades, widening horizontally the distribution of eye movements, and a shift of the overall distribution of saccades into the blind field. This review highlights the lack of studies reporting head and other body movement parameters in hemianopia. Further studies with robust methodology and large sample sizes involving participants with post-stroke visual field loss are needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020194403 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8004433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80044332021-03-30 Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review Elfeky, Adel D’Août, Kristiaan Lawson, Rebecca Hepworth, Lauren R. Thomas, Nicholas D. A. Clynch, Abigail Rowe, Fiona J. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Homonymous visual field defects represent the most frequent type of visual field loss after stroke, affecting nearly 30% of individuals with unilateral post-chiasmal brain damage. This review aimed to gather the available evidence on the biomechanical changes to visual field loss following stroke. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted inclusive of randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, before-after studies and case-controlled studies. Studies including adult and paediatric participants that investigated eye, head, or body movements in post-stroke visual field loss during visual exploration tasks were included. Search terms included a range of MESH terms as well as alternative terms relating to stroke, visual field loss, hemianopia, visual functions and scanning behaviour. Articles were selected by two authors independently. Data were extracted by one author and verified by a second. All included articles were assessed for risk of bias using checklists appropriate to the study design. RESULTS: Thirty-six articles (1123 participants) were included in the overall review (Kappa 0.863) and categorised into simulated or true visual field loss (typically hemianopia). Seven studies identified the biomechanical alterations to simulated hemianopia compared to normal performance. Twenty-nine studies detailed eye, head and body movement parameters in true hemianopia. Hemianopic participants and healthy adults with simulated hemianopia differed significantly from controls in various fixation and saccade parameters as indicated by increased number and duration of fixations, number and duration of saccades and scan path length with shorter mean saccadic amplitude. Under simulated hemianopia, participants were consistently biased towards the sighted visual field while gaze behaviour in true hemianopia was biased in the direction of the blind hemifield. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable evidence on the altered eye movements that occur in true hemianopia and in healthy adults with simulated hemianopia. Successful performance in naturalistic tasks of visual exploration appears to be related to compensatory mechanisms of visual exploratory behaviour, namely, an increase in the amplitude and peak velocity of saccades, widening horizontally the distribution of eye movements, and a shift of the overall distribution of saccades into the blind field. This review highlights the lack of studies reporting head and other body movement parameters in hemianopia. Further studies with robust methodology and large sample sizes involving participants with post-stroke visual field loss are needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020194403 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4. BioMed Central 2021-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8004433/ /pubmed/33771214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Elfeky, Adel D’Août, Kristiaan Lawson, Rebecca Hepworth, Lauren R. Thomas, Nicholas D. A. Clynch, Abigail Rowe, Fiona J. Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review |
title | Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review |
title_full | Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review |
title_short | Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review |
title_sort | biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01634-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elfekyadel biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview AT daoutkristiaan biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview AT lawsonrebecca biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview AT hepworthlaurenr biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview AT thomasnicholasda biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview AT clynchabigail biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview AT rowefionaj biomechanicaladaptationtopoststrokevisualfieldlossasystematicreview |