Cargando…

Combining respondent-driven sampling with a community-based participatory action study of people who smoke drugs in two cities in British Columbia, Canada

BACKGROUND: The smoking of illicit drugs presents a serious social and economic burden in Canada. People who smoke drugs (PWSD) are at increased risk of contracting multiple infections through risky drug practices. Peer-led harm reduction activities, and the resulting social networks that form aroun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elkhalifa, Sulaf, Jozaghi, Ehsan, Marsh, Samona, Thomson, Erica, Gregg, Delilah, Buxton, Jane, Jolly, Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00482-8
_version_ 1783671911974174720
author Elkhalifa, Sulaf
Jozaghi, Ehsan
Marsh, Samona
Thomson, Erica
Gregg, Delilah
Buxton, Jane
Jolly, Ann
author_facet Elkhalifa, Sulaf
Jozaghi, Ehsan
Marsh, Samona
Thomson, Erica
Gregg, Delilah
Buxton, Jane
Jolly, Ann
author_sort Elkhalifa, Sulaf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The smoking of illicit drugs presents a serious social and economic burden in Canada. People who smoke drugs (PWSD) are at increased risk of contracting multiple infections through risky drug practices. Peer-led harm reduction activities, and the resulting social networks that form around them, can potentially minimize the dangers associated with the smoking illicit drugs. GOAL: The goals of this study were to pilot test the combined approaches of respondent driven sampling with community based participatory action research in these settings and compare the attributes and social networks of PWSD in two British Columbia cities with different harm reduction programs. METHODS: Using community-based participatory action research (CBPAR) and respondent-driven sampling (RDS), individuals with lived drug experiences were employed from communities in Abbotsford and Vancouver as peer researchers to interview ten contacts from their social networks. Contacts completed a questionnaire about their harm reduction behaviours and interactions. RESULTS: We found that PWSD residing in Abbotsford were more likely to report engaging in harm-promoting behaviours, such as sharing, reusing, or borrowing crack pipes. However, PWSD in the Downtown East side Community of Vancouver were more likely to report engaging in harm-reducing activities, such as being trained in naloxone use and CPR. We found no differences in network sizes between the two communities, despite the population differences and harm reduction programs CONCLUSION: The high participation rates and interactions between researchers, and peer researchers enriched the study implementation and successfully informed our results. The fact that there were no differences in network size suggests that people have similar support in Vancouver as in Abbotsford, and that drug use practices differ mainly due to availability of harm reduction programming and resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8004455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80044552021-03-30 Combining respondent-driven sampling with a community-based participatory action study of people who smoke drugs in two cities in British Columbia, Canada Elkhalifa, Sulaf Jozaghi, Ehsan Marsh, Samona Thomson, Erica Gregg, Delilah Buxton, Jane Jolly, Ann Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: The smoking of illicit drugs presents a serious social and economic burden in Canada. People who smoke drugs (PWSD) are at increased risk of contracting multiple infections through risky drug practices. Peer-led harm reduction activities, and the resulting social networks that form around them, can potentially minimize the dangers associated with the smoking illicit drugs. GOAL: The goals of this study were to pilot test the combined approaches of respondent driven sampling with community based participatory action research in these settings and compare the attributes and social networks of PWSD in two British Columbia cities with different harm reduction programs. METHODS: Using community-based participatory action research (CBPAR) and respondent-driven sampling (RDS), individuals with lived drug experiences were employed from communities in Abbotsford and Vancouver as peer researchers to interview ten contacts from their social networks. Contacts completed a questionnaire about their harm reduction behaviours and interactions. RESULTS: We found that PWSD residing in Abbotsford were more likely to report engaging in harm-promoting behaviours, such as sharing, reusing, or borrowing crack pipes. However, PWSD in the Downtown East side Community of Vancouver were more likely to report engaging in harm-reducing activities, such as being trained in naloxone use and CPR. We found no differences in network sizes between the two communities, despite the population differences and harm reduction programs CONCLUSION: The high participation rates and interactions between researchers, and peer researchers enriched the study implementation and successfully informed our results. The fact that there were no differences in network size suggests that people have similar support in Vancouver as in Abbotsford, and that drug use practices differ mainly due to availability of harm reduction programming and resources. BioMed Central 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8004455/ /pubmed/33771164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00482-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Elkhalifa, Sulaf
Jozaghi, Ehsan
Marsh, Samona
Thomson, Erica
Gregg, Delilah
Buxton, Jane
Jolly, Ann
Combining respondent-driven sampling with a community-based participatory action study of people who smoke drugs in two cities in British Columbia, Canada
title Combining respondent-driven sampling with a community-based participatory action study of people who smoke drugs in two cities in British Columbia, Canada
title_full Combining respondent-driven sampling with a community-based participatory action study of people who smoke drugs in two cities in British Columbia, Canada
title_fullStr Combining respondent-driven sampling with a community-based participatory action study of people who smoke drugs in two cities in British Columbia, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Combining respondent-driven sampling with a community-based participatory action study of people who smoke drugs in two cities in British Columbia, Canada
title_short Combining respondent-driven sampling with a community-based participatory action study of people who smoke drugs in two cities in British Columbia, Canada
title_sort combining respondent-driven sampling with a community-based participatory action study of people who smoke drugs in two cities in british columbia, canada
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-021-00482-8
work_keys_str_mv AT elkhalifasulaf combiningrespondentdrivensamplingwithacommunitybasedparticipatoryactionstudyofpeoplewhosmokedrugsintwocitiesinbritishcolumbiacanada
AT jozaghiehsan combiningrespondentdrivensamplingwithacommunitybasedparticipatoryactionstudyofpeoplewhosmokedrugsintwocitiesinbritishcolumbiacanada
AT marshsamona combiningrespondentdrivensamplingwithacommunitybasedparticipatoryactionstudyofpeoplewhosmokedrugsintwocitiesinbritishcolumbiacanada
AT thomsonerica combiningrespondentdrivensamplingwithacommunitybasedparticipatoryactionstudyofpeoplewhosmokedrugsintwocitiesinbritishcolumbiacanada
AT greggdelilah combiningrespondentdrivensamplingwithacommunitybasedparticipatoryactionstudyofpeoplewhosmokedrugsintwocitiesinbritishcolumbiacanada
AT buxtonjane combiningrespondentdrivensamplingwithacommunitybasedparticipatoryactionstudyofpeoplewhosmokedrugsintwocitiesinbritishcolumbiacanada
AT jollyann combiningrespondentdrivensamplingwithacommunitybasedparticipatoryactionstudyofpeoplewhosmokedrugsintwocitiesinbritishcolumbiacanada