Cargando…

Comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints

BACKGROUND: This study attempted to compare the radiopharmaceutical uptake findings of planar bone scintigraphy (BS) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) performed on knee joints. METHODS: We retrospectively included 104 patients who underwent bone SPECT/CT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Young-Sil, Park, Do Young, Min, Byoung-Hyun, Lee, Su Jin, Yoon, Joon-Kee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00590-8
_version_ 1783671915245731840
author An, Young-Sil
Park, Do Young
Min, Byoung-Hyun
Lee, Su Jin
Yoon, Joon-Kee
author_facet An, Young-Sil
Park, Do Young
Min, Byoung-Hyun
Lee, Su Jin
Yoon, Joon-Kee
author_sort An, Young-Sil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study attempted to compare the radiopharmaceutical uptake findings of planar bone scintigraphy (BS) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) performed on knee joints. METHODS: We retrospectively included 104 patients who underwent bone SPECT/CT and BS 4 h after the intravenous administration of technetium-99m-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate ((99m)Tc-HDP) for pain in the knee joint. The uptake degree of each of the knee regions (medial femoral, lateral femoral, medial tibial, lateral tibial, and patellar area) in planar images and SPECT/CT were evaluated by visual (grades 0 to 2) and quantitative analyses (uptake counts for planar image and standardized uptake values [SUVs] for SPECT/CT). RESULTS: The uptake grades assessed visually on the planar images differed significantly from the uptake grades on SPECT/CT images in all areas of the knee (all p < 0.001), and SPECT/CT imaging revealed a larger number of uptake lesions than those noted in planar imaging for each patient (3.3 ± 2.0 vs 2.4 ± 2.3, p < 0.0001). In all regions of the knee, all of the quantitative values, including uptake counts obtained from the planar image as well as the maximum SUV (SUVmax) and mean SUV (SUVmean) obtained from SPECT/CT, showed statistically higher values as their visual grades increased (all p < 0.001). However, when analyzed for each area, only the SUVmax showed a significant difference by grade in all knee regions. Quantitative uptake values obtained from planar images were moderately correlated with SUVs of SPECT/CT images (r = 0.58 for SUVmean and r = 0.53 for SUVmax, all p < 0.001) in the total knee regions. Looking at each area, there was a significant but low correlation between the uptake counts of the planar images and the SUVs on SPECT/CT in the right lateral tibial region (r = 0.45 for SUVmean, r = 0.31 for SUVmax, all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In assessing knee joints, the findings of planar images and SPECT/CT images differ both visually and quantitatively, and more lesions can be found in SPECT/CT than in the planar images. The SUVmax could be a reliable value to evaluate knee joint uptake activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8004469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80044692021-03-30 Comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints An, Young-Sil Park, Do Young Min, Byoung-Hyun Lee, Su Jin Yoon, Joon-Kee BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUND: This study attempted to compare the radiopharmaceutical uptake findings of planar bone scintigraphy (BS) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) performed on knee joints. METHODS: We retrospectively included 104 patients who underwent bone SPECT/CT and BS 4 h after the intravenous administration of technetium-99m-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate ((99m)Tc-HDP) for pain in the knee joint. The uptake degree of each of the knee regions (medial femoral, lateral femoral, medial tibial, lateral tibial, and patellar area) in planar images and SPECT/CT were evaluated by visual (grades 0 to 2) and quantitative analyses (uptake counts for planar image and standardized uptake values [SUVs] for SPECT/CT). RESULTS: The uptake grades assessed visually on the planar images differed significantly from the uptake grades on SPECT/CT images in all areas of the knee (all p < 0.001), and SPECT/CT imaging revealed a larger number of uptake lesions than those noted in planar imaging for each patient (3.3 ± 2.0 vs 2.4 ± 2.3, p < 0.0001). In all regions of the knee, all of the quantitative values, including uptake counts obtained from the planar image as well as the maximum SUV (SUVmax) and mean SUV (SUVmean) obtained from SPECT/CT, showed statistically higher values as their visual grades increased (all p < 0.001). However, when analyzed for each area, only the SUVmax showed a significant difference by grade in all knee regions. Quantitative uptake values obtained from planar images were moderately correlated with SUVs of SPECT/CT images (r = 0.58 for SUVmean and r = 0.53 for SUVmax, all p < 0.001) in the total knee regions. Looking at each area, there was a significant but low correlation between the uptake counts of the planar images and the SUVs on SPECT/CT in the right lateral tibial region (r = 0.45 for SUVmean, r = 0.31 for SUVmax, all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In assessing knee joints, the findings of planar images and SPECT/CT images differ both visually and quantitatively, and more lesions can be found in SPECT/CT than in the planar images. The SUVmax could be a reliable value to evaluate knee joint uptake activity. BioMed Central 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8004469/ /pubmed/33771130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00590-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
An, Young-Sil
Park, Do Young
Min, Byoung-Hyun
Lee, Su Jin
Yoon, Joon-Kee
Comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints
title Comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints
title_full Comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints
title_fullStr Comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints
title_short Comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints
title_sort comparison of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (spect)/ct and bone scintigraphy in assessing knee joints
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00590-8
work_keys_str_mv AT anyoungsil comparisonofbonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectctandbonescintigraphyinassessingkneejoints
AT parkdoyoung comparisonofbonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectctandbonescintigraphyinassessingkneejoints
AT minbyounghyun comparisonofbonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectctandbonescintigraphyinassessingkneejoints
AT leesujin comparisonofbonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectctandbonescintigraphyinassessingkneejoints
AT yoonjoonkee comparisonofbonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectctandbonescintigraphyinassessingkneejoints