Cargando…
Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Safinamide is a novel anti-parkinsonian drug with possible anti-dyskinetic properties. Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disease. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of safinamide administration compared...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01011-y |
_version_ | 1783671917657456640 |
---|---|
author | Giossi, Riccardo Carrara, Federica Mazzari, Martina Lo Re, Francesco Senatore, Michele Schicchi, Azzurra Corrù, Federica Fittipaldo, Veronica Andrea Pani, Arianna Tramacere, Irene Elia, Antonio Emanuele Scaglione, Francesco |
author_facet | Giossi, Riccardo Carrara, Federica Mazzari, Martina Lo Re, Francesco Senatore, Michele Schicchi, Azzurra Corrù, Federica Fittipaldo, Veronica Andrea Pani, Arianna Tramacere, Irene Elia, Antonio Emanuele Scaglione, Francesco |
author_sort | Giossi, Riccardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Safinamide is a novel anti-parkinsonian drug with possible anti-dyskinetic properties. Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disease. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of safinamide administration compared to placebo in PD patients on multiple outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, and trial databases were searched up to 23 December 2020 for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing safinamide to placebo, alone or as add-on therapy in PD. Data were extracted from literature and regulatory agencies. Primary outcomes were ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, OFF-time, and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) section III (UPDRS-III). Secondary outcomes included any dyskinesia rating scale (DRS), ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia, UPDRS-II, and Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). In order to estimate mean difference (MD) and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI), generic inverse variance and Mantel–Haenszel methods were used for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Analyses were performed grouping by PD with (PDwMF) or without (PDwoMF) motor fluctuations, safinamide dose, and concomitant dopaminergic treatment. Summary of findings with GRADE were performed. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 2792 participants were identified. In PDwMF patients, safinamide 100 mg as add-on to levodopa (l-dopa) significantly increased ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia (MD = 0.95 h; 95% CI from 0.41 to 1.49), reduced OFF-time (MD = − 1.06 h; 95% CI from − 1.60 to − 0.51), and improved UPDRS-III (MD = − 2.77; 95% CI from − 4.27 to − 1.28) with moderate quality of evidence. Similar results were observed for the 50 mg dose. However, the quality of evidence was moderate only for ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, whereas for OFF-time and UPDRS-III was low. In PDwoMF patients taking a single dopamine agonist, safinamide 100 mg resulted in little to no clinically significant improvement in UPDRS-III (MD = − 1.84; 95% CI from − 3.19 to − 0.49), with moderate quality of evidence. Conversely, in PDwoMF patients, the 200 mg and 50 mg doses showed nonsignificant improvement in UPDRS-III, with very low and moderate quality of evidence, respectively. In PDwMF patients taking safinamide 100 mg or 50 mg, nonsignificant differences were observed for ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia and DRS, with high and low quality of evidence, respectively. In the same patients, UPDRS-II was significantly improved at the 100 mg and 50 mg dose, with high and moderate quality of evidence. In PDwoMF, UPDRS-II showed a little yet significant difference only at 100 mg, with low quality of evidence. PDQ-39 resulted significantly improved only with the 100 mg dose in PDwMF, with low quality of evidence. CONCLUSION: Overall, safinamide is effective in PDwMF patients taking l-dopa both at 100 and 50 mg daily. Evidence for efficacy in early PD is limited. Further trials are needed to better evaluate the anti-dyskinetic properties of safinamide. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01011-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8004480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80044802021-04-16 Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis Giossi, Riccardo Carrara, Federica Mazzari, Martina Lo Re, Francesco Senatore, Michele Schicchi, Azzurra Corrù, Federica Fittipaldo, Veronica Andrea Pani, Arianna Tramacere, Irene Elia, Antonio Emanuele Scaglione, Francesco Clin Drug Investig Systematic Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Safinamide is a novel anti-parkinsonian drug with possible anti-dyskinetic properties. Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disease. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of safinamide administration compared to placebo in PD patients on multiple outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, and trial databases were searched up to 23 December 2020 for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing safinamide to placebo, alone or as add-on therapy in PD. Data were extracted from literature and regulatory agencies. Primary outcomes were ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, OFF-time, and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) section III (UPDRS-III). Secondary outcomes included any dyskinesia rating scale (DRS), ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia, UPDRS-II, and Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). In order to estimate mean difference (MD) and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI), generic inverse variance and Mantel–Haenszel methods were used for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Analyses were performed grouping by PD with (PDwMF) or without (PDwoMF) motor fluctuations, safinamide dose, and concomitant dopaminergic treatment. Summary of findings with GRADE were performed. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 2792 participants were identified. In PDwMF patients, safinamide 100 mg as add-on to levodopa (l-dopa) significantly increased ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia (MD = 0.95 h; 95% CI from 0.41 to 1.49), reduced OFF-time (MD = − 1.06 h; 95% CI from − 1.60 to − 0.51), and improved UPDRS-III (MD = − 2.77; 95% CI from − 4.27 to − 1.28) with moderate quality of evidence. Similar results were observed for the 50 mg dose. However, the quality of evidence was moderate only for ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, whereas for OFF-time and UPDRS-III was low. In PDwoMF patients taking a single dopamine agonist, safinamide 100 mg resulted in little to no clinically significant improvement in UPDRS-III (MD = − 1.84; 95% CI from − 3.19 to − 0.49), with moderate quality of evidence. Conversely, in PDwoMF patients, the 200 mg and 50 mg doses showed nonsignificant improvement in UPDRS-III, with very low and moderate quality of evidence, respectively. In PDwMF patients taking safinamide 100 mg or 50 mg, nonsignificant differences were observed for ON-time with troublesome dyskinesia and DRS, with high and low quality of evidence, respectively. In the same patients, UPDRS-II was significantly improved at the 100 mg and 50 mg dose, with high and moderate quality of evidence. In PDwoMF, UPDRS-II showed a little yet significant difference only at 100 mg, with low quality of evidence. PDQ-39 resulted significantly improved only with the 100 mg dose in PDwMF, with low quality of evidence. CONCLUSION: Overall, safinamide is effective in PDwMF patients taking l-dopa both at 100 and 50 mg daily. Evidence for efficacy in early PD is limited. Further trials are needed to better evaluate the anti-dyskinetic properties of safinamide. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01011-y. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8004480/ /pubmed/33674954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01011-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Giossi, Riccardo Carrara, Federica Mazzari, Martina Lo Re, Francesco Senatore, Michele Schicchi, Azzurra Corrù, Federica Fittipaldo, Veronica Andrea Pani, Arianna Tramacere, Irene Elia, Antonio Emanuele Scaglione, Francesco Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis |
title | Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis |
title_full | Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis |
title_short | Overall Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis |
title_sort | overall efficacy and safety of safinamide in parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and a meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01011-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giossiriccardo overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT carrarafederica overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT mazzarimartina overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT lorefrancesco overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT senatoremichele overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT schicchiazzurra overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT corrufederica overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT fittipaldoveronicaandrea overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT paniarianna overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT tramacereirene overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT eliaantonioemanuele overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis AT scaglionefrancesco overallefficacyandsafetyofsafinamideinparkinsonsdiseaseasystematicreviewandametaanalysis |