Cargando…

The Landscape of Videofluoroscopy in the UK: A Web-Based Survey

Videofluoroscopy (VFS) is considered one of the gold-standard assessments of swallowing. Whilst guidelines for the application and conduct of VFS exist, their translation into clinical practice remain challenging. To build a greater understanding on how VFS clinics operate in the UK. A web-based sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benfield, J. K., Michou, E., Everton, L. F., Mills, C., Hamdy, S., Bath, P. M., England, T. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32417980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10130-1
_version_ 1783671924067401728
author Benfield, J. K.
Michou, E.
Everton, L. F.
Mills, C.
Hamdy, S.
Bath, P. M.
England, T. J.
author_facet Benfield, J. K.
Michou, E.
Everton, L. F.
Mills, C.
Hamdy, S.
Bath, P. M.
England, T. J.
author_sort Benfield, J. K.
collection PubMed
description Videofluoroscopy (VFS) is considered one of the gold-standard assessments of swallowing. Whilst guidelines for the application and conduct of VFS exist, their translation into clinical practice remain challenging. To build a greater understanding on how VFS clinics operate in the UK. A web-based survey was shared with speech and language therapists (SLTs) working in VFS clinics via professional networks and social media from October 2018 to January 2019. 101 responses were received. Two thirds of clinics were SLT-led, with the majority of clinics being run by two SLTs (73.6%) and a radiographer (95.5%) also known as radiologic technologists, diagnostic radiographers and medical radiation technologists. Less than 50% of radiographers had received specialist training. Around half of the clinics used a standard assessment or analysis protocol and 88.1% a rating scale. Set recipes for a range of textures were used in 53.4% of VFS clinics. Barium and water soluble contrasts were used, but only 15.8% knew the concentration of contrast used. The most commonly reported VFS pulse and frame rate was 15 per second. There was evidence of a lack of SLT knowledge regarding technical operation of VFS. Screening times varied from 0.7–10 min (median 3 min, IQR 2.5–3.5). Around 50% of respondents reported quality issues affecting analysis. In a survey of UK SLTs, translation of VFS guidance into practice was found to be limited which may impact on the quality of assessment and analysis. Collaboration with radiology, strengthening of guidelines and greater uptake of specialist training is deemed essential. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00455-020-10130-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8004508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80045082021-04-16 The Landscape of Videofluoroscopy in the UK: A Web-Based Survey Benfield, J. K. Michou, E. Everton, L. F. Mills, C. Hamdy, S. Bath, P. M. England, T. J. Dysphagia Original Article Videofluoroscopy (VFS) is considered one of the gold-standard assessments of swallowing. Whilst guidelines for the application and conduct of VFS exist, their translation into clinical practice remain challenging. To build a greater understanding on how VFS clinics operate in the UK. A web-based survey was shared with speech and language therapists (SLTs) working in VFS clinics via professional networks and social media from October 2018 to January 2019. 101 responses were received. Two thirds of clinics were SLT-led, with the majority of clinics being run by two SLTs (73.6%) and a radiographer (95.5%) also known as radiologic technologists, diagnostic radiographers and medical radiation technologists. Less than 50% of radiographers had received specialist training. Around half of the clinics used a standard assessment or analysis protocol and 88.1% a rating scale. Set recipes for a range of textures were used in 53.4% of VFS clinics. Barium and water soluble contrasts were used, but only 15.8% knew the concentration of contrast used. The most commonly reported VFS pulse and frame rate was 15 per second. There was evidence of a lack of SLT knowledge regarding technical operation of VFS. Screening times varied from 0.7–10 min (median 3 min, IQR 2.5–3.5). Around 50% of respondents reported quality issues affecting analysis. In a survey of UK SLTs, translation of VFS guidance into practice was found to be limited which may impact on the quality of assessment and analysis. Collaboration with radiology, strengthening of guidelines and greater uptake of specialist training is deemed essential. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00455-020-10130-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-05-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8004508/ /pubmed/32417980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10130-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Benfield, J. K.
Michou, E.
Everton, L. F.
Mills, C.
Hamdy, S.
Bath, P. M.
England, T. J.
The Landscape of Videofluoroscopy in the UK: A Web-Based Survey
title The Landscape of Videofluoroscopy in the UK: A Web-Based Survey
title_full The Landscape of Videofluoroscopy in the UK: A Web-Based Survey
title_fullStr The Landscape of Videofluoroscopy in the UK: A Web-Based Survey
title_full_unstemmed The Landscape of Videofluoroscopy in the UK: A Web-Based Survey
title_short The Landscape of Videofluoroscopy in the UK: A Web-Based Survey
title_sort landscape of videofluoroscopy in the uk: a web-based survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32417980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10130-1
work_keys_str_mv AT benfieldjk thelandscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT michoue thelandscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT evertonlf thelandscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT millsc thelandscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT hamdys thelandscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT bathpm thelandscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT englandtj thelandscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT benfieldjk landscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT michoue landscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT evertonlf landscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT millsc landscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT hamdys landscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT bathpm landscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey
AT englandtj landscapeofvideofluoroscopyintheukawebbasedsurvey