Cargando…

Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury

OBJECTIVE: To report the authors' experience in performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for zone 2 lesions after traumatic aortic injury (TAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 10 patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR after identification of aortic isthmus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bae, Miju, Jeon, Chang Ho, Kwon, Hoon, Kim, Jin Hyeok, Choi, Seon Uoo, Song, Seunghwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0989
_version_ 1783672110001946624
author Bae, Miju
Jeon, Chang Ho
Kwon, Hoon
Kim, Jin Hyeok
Choi, Seon Uoo
Song, Seunghwan
author_facet Bae, Miju
Jeon, Chang Ho
Kwon, Hoon
Kim, Jin Hyeok
Choi, Seon Uoo
Song, Seunghwan
author_sort Bae, Miju
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To report the authors' experience in performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for zone 2 lesions after traumatic aortic injury (TAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 10 patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR after identification of aortic isthmus injury by CT angiography (CTA) upon arrival at the emergency room of a regional trauma center from 2016 to 2019. Patients were classified into two groups: those who underwent left subclavian artery (LSA) embolization concurrently with the main TEVAR procedure, and those in whom LSA embolization was not performed during the main procedure, but was planned as a bailout treatment if type II endoleak was noted on follow-up CTA images. Pre-procedural and procedure-related factors and post-procedure prognosis were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in pre-procedural factors, occurrence of endoleaks, and post-procedure prognosis (including mortality) between patients in the two groups. The duration of the procedure was shorter in the non-LSA embolization group (61 minutes vs. 27 minutes, p = 0.012). During follow-up, type II endoleak did not occur in either group. CONCLUSION: Delaying preventative LSA embolization until stabilization of the patient would be desirable when performing zone 2 TEVAR for TAI, in the absence of endoleak on the completion aortography image taken after complete deployment of the stent graft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8005354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80053542021-04-03 Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury Bae, Miju Jeon, Chang Ho Kwon, Hoon Kim, Jin Hyeok Choi, Seon Uoo Song, Seunghwan Korean J Radiol Intervention OBJECTIVE: To report the authors' experience in performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for zone 2 lesions after traumatic aortic injury (TAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 10 patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR after identification of aortic isthmus injury by CT angiography (CTA) upon arrival at the emergency room of a regional trauma center from 2016 to 2019. Patients were classified into two groups: those who underwent left subclavian artery (LSA) embolization concurrently with the main TEVAR procedure, and those in whom LSA embolization was not performed during the main procedure, but was planned as a bailout treatment if type II endoleak was noted on follow-up CTA images. Pre-procedural and procedure-related factors and post-procedure prognosis were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in pre-procedural factors, occurrence of endoleaks, and post-procedure prognosis (including mortality) between patients in the two groups. The duration of the procedure was shorter in the non-LSA embolization group (61 minutes vs. 27 minutes, p = 0.012). During follow-up, type II endoleak did not occur in either group. CONCLUSION: Delaying preventative LSA embolization until stabilization of the patient would be desirable when performing zone 2 TEVAR for TAI, in the absence of endoleak on the completion aortography image taken after complete deployment of the stent graft. The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-04 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8005354/ /pubmed/33543841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0989 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Intervention
Bae, Miju
Jeon, Chang Ho
Kwon, Hoon
Kim, Jin Hyeok
Choi, Seon Uoo
Song, Seunghwan
Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury
title Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury
title_full Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury
title_fullStr Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury
title_short Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury
title_sort evaluation of zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair performed with and without prophylactic embolization of the left subclavian artery in patients with traumatic aortic injury
topic Intervention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0989
work_keys_str_mv AT baemiju evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury
AT jeonchangho evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury
AT kwonhoon evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury
AT kimjinhyeok evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury
AT choiseonuoo evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury
AT songseunghwan evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury