Cargando…
Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury
OBJECTIVE: To report the authors' experience in performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for zone 2 lesions after traumatic aortic injury (TAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 10 patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR after identification of aortic isthmus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0989 |
_version_ | 1783672110001946624 |
---|---|
author | Bae, Miju Jeon, Chang Ho Kwon, Hoon Kim, Jin Hyeok Choi, Seon Uoo Song, Seunghwan |
author_facet | Bae, Miju Jeon, Chang Ho Kwon, Hoon Kim, Jin Hyeok Choi, Seon Uoo Song, Seunghwan |
author_sort | Bae, Miju |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To report the authors' experience in performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for zone 2 lesions after traumatic aortic injury (TAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 10 patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR after identification of aortic isthmus injury by CT angiography (CTA) upon arrival at the emergency room of a regional trauma center from 2016 to 2019. Patients were classified into two groups: those who underwent left subclavian artery (LSA) embolization concurrently with the main TEVAR procedure, and those in whom LSA embolization was not performed during the main procedure, but was planned as a bailout treatment if type II endoleak was noted on follow-up CTA images. Pre-procedural and procedure-related factors and post-procedure prognosis were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in pre-procedural factors, occurrence of endoleaks, and post-procedure prognosis (including mortality) between patients in the two groups. The duration of the procedure was shorter in the non-LSA embolization group (61 minutes vs. 27 minutes, p = 0.012). During follow-up, type II endoleak did not occur in either group. CONCLUSION: Delaying preventative LSA embolization until stabilization of the patient would be desirable when performing zone 2 TEVAR for TAI, in the absence of endoleak on the completion aortography image taken after complete deployment of the stent graft. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8005354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80053542021-04-03 Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury Bae, Miju Jeon, Chang Ho Kwon, Hoon Kim, Jin Hyeok Choi, Seon Uoo Song, Seunghwan Korean J Radiol Intervention OBJECTIVE: To report the authors' experience in performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for zone 2 lesions after traumatic aortic injury (TAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 10 patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR after identification of aortic isthmus injury by CT angiography (CTA) upon arrival at the emergency room of a regional trauma center from 2016 to 2019. Patients were classified into two groups: those who underwent left subclavian artery (LSA) embolization concurrently with the main TEVAR procedure, and those in whom LSA embolization was not performed during the main procedure, but was planned as a bailout treatment if type II endoleak was noted on follow-up CTA images. Pre-procedural and procedure-related factors and post-procedure prognosis were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in pre-procedural factors, occurrence of endoleaks, and post-procedure prognosis (including mortality) between patients in the two groups. The duration of the procedure was shorter in the non-LSA embolization group (61 minutes vs. 27 minutes, p = 0.012). During follow-up, type II endoleak did not occur in either group. CONCLUSION: Delaying preventative LSA embolization until stabilization of the patient would be desirable when performing zone 2 TEVAR for TAI, in the absence of endoleak on the completion aortography image taken after complete deployment of the stent graft. The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-04 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8005354/ /pubmed/33543841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0989 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Intervention Bae, Miju Jeon, Chang Ho Kwon, Hoon Kim, Jin Hyeok Choi, Seon Uoo Song, Seunghwan Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury |
title | Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury |
title_full | Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury |
title_short | Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury |
title_sort | evaluation of zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair performed with and without prophylactic embolization of the left subclavian artery in patients with traumatic aortic injury |
topic | Intervention |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baemiju evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury AT jeonchangho evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury AT kwonhoon evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury AT kimjinhyeok evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury AT choiseonuoo evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury AT songseunghwan evaluationofzone2thoracicendovascularaorticrepairperformedwithandwithoutprophylacticembolizationoftheleftsubclavianarteryinpatientswithtraumaticaorticinjury |