Cargando…
Co-creating Virtual Reality Interventions for Alcohol Prevention: Living Lab vs. Co-design
Addressing the need for collaborative involvement in health intervention design requires application of processes that researchers and practitioners can apply confidently to actively involve end-users and wider stakeholder groups. Co-creation enables participation by focusing on empowering a range o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33791269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.634102 |
_version_ | 1783672135876608000 |
---|---|
author | Dietrich, Timo Guldager, Julie Dalgaard Lyk, Patricia Vallentin-Holbech, Lotte Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn Majgaard, Gunver Stock, Christiane |
author_facet | Dietrich, Timo Guldager, Julie Dalgaard Lyk, Patricia Vallentin-Holbech, Lotte Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn Majgaard, Gunver Stock, Christiane |
author_sort | Dietrich, Timo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Addressing the need for collaborative involvement in health intervention design requires application of processes that researchers and practitioners can apply confidently to actively involve end-users and wider stakeholder groups. Co-creation enables participation by focusing on empowering a range of stakeholders with opportunities to influence the final intervention design. While collaboration with users and stakeholders during intervention design processes are considered vital, clear articulation of procedures and considerations for various co-creation methodologies warrants further research attention. This paper is based on two case studies conducted in Australia and Denmark where researchers co-created virtual reality interventions in an alcohol prevention context. This paper explored and reflected on two co-creation methods–co-design and the Living Lab—and showcased the different processes and procedures of each approach. The study demonstrates that both approaches have merit, yet highlights tensions in distinguishing between the application of each of the respective steps undertaken in each of the processes. While a lot of similarities exist between approaches, differences are evident. Overall, it can be said that the Living Lab is broader in scope and processes applied within the Living Labs approach are more abstract. The co-design process that we applied in the first case study is described more granularly delivering a clear a step-by-step guide that practitioners can implement to co-design solutions that end-users value and that stakeholders support. An agenda to guide future research is outlined challenging researchers to identify the most effective co-creation approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8005569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80055692021-03-30 Co-creating Virtual Reality Interventions for Alcohol Prevention: Living Lab vs. Co-design Dietrich, Timo Guldager, Julie Dalgaard Lyk, Patricia Vallentin-Holbech, Lotte Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn Majgaard, Gunver Stock, Christiane Front Public Health Public Health Addressing the need for collaborative involvement in health intervention design requires application of processes that researchers and practitioners can apply confidently to actively involve end-users and wider stakeholder groups. Co-creation enables participation by focusing on empowering a range of stakeholders with opportunities to influence the final intervention design. While collaboration with users and stakeholders during intervention design processes are considered vital, clear articulation of procedures and considerations for various co-creation methodologies warrants further research attention. This paper is based on two case studies conducted in Australia and Denmark where researchers co-created virtual reality interventions in an alcohol prevention context. This paper explored and reflected on two co-creation methods–co-design and the Living Lab—and showcased the different processes and procedures of each approach. The study demonstrates that both approaches have merit, yet highlights tensions in distinguishing between the application of each of the respective steps undertaken in each of the processes. While a lot of similarities exist between approaches, differences are evident. Overall, it can be said that the Living Lab is broader in scope and processes applied within the Living Labs approach are more abstract. The co-design process that we applied in the first case study is described more granularly delivering a clear a step-by-step guide that practitioners can implement to co-design solutions that end-users value and that stakeholders support. An agenda to guide future research is outlined challenging researchers to identify the most effective co-creation approach. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8005569/ /pubmed/33791269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.634102 Text en Copyright © 2021 Dietrich, Guldager, Lyk, Vallentin-Holbech, Rundle-Thiele, Majgaard and Stock. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Dietrich, Timo Guldager, Julie Dalgaard Lyk, Patricia Vallentin-Holbech, Lotte Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn Majgaard, Gunver Stock, Christiane Co-creating Virtual Reality Interventions for Alcohol Prevention: Living Lab vs. Co-design |
title | Co-creating Virtual Reality Interventions for Alcohol Prevention: Living Lab vs. Co-design |
title_full | Co-creating Virtual Reality Interventions for Alcohol Prevention: Living Lab vs. Co-design |
title_fullStr | Co-creating Virtual Reality Interventions for Alcohol Prevention: Living Lab vs. Co-design |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-creating Virtual Reality Interventions for Alcohol Prevention: Living Lab vs. Co-design |
title_short | Co-creating Virtual Reality Interventions for Alcohol Prevention: Living Lab vs. Co-design |
title_sort | co-creating virtual reality interventions for alcohol prevention: living lab vs. co-design |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33791269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.634102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dietrichtimo cocreatingvirtualrealityinterventionsforalcoholpreventionlivinglabvscodesign AT guldagerjuliedalgaard cocreatingvirtualrealityinterventionsforalcoholpreventionlivinglabvscodesign AT lykpatricia cocreatingvirtualrealityinterventionsforalcoholpreventionlivinglabvscodesign AT vallentinholbechlotte cocreatingvirtualrealityinterventionsforalcoholpreventionlivinglabvscodesign AT rundlethielesharyn cocreatingvirtualrealityinterventionsforalcoholpreventionlivinglabvscodesign AT majgaardgunver cocreatingvirtualrealityinterventionsforalcoholpreventionlivinglabvscodesign AT stockchristiane cocreatingvirtualrealityinterventionsforalcoholpreventionlivinglabvscodesign |