Cargando…

Assessing the Need for Multiplex and Multifunctional Tick-Borne Disease Test in Routine Clinical Laboratory Samples from Lyme Disease and Febrile Patients with a History of a Tick Bite

Human polymicrobial infections in tick-borne disease (TBD) patients is an emerging public health theme. However, the requirement for holistic TBD tests in routine clinical laboratories is ambiguous. TICKPLEX(®) PLUS is a holistic TBD test utilized herein to assess the need for multiplex and multifun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garg, Kunal, Jokiranta, T. Sakari, Filén, Sanna, Gilbert, Leona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6010038
_version_ 1783672221830479872
author Garg, Kunal
Jokiranta, T. Sakari
Filén, Sanna
Gilbert, Leona
author_facet Garg, Kunal
Jokiranta, T. Sakari
Filén, Sanna
Gilbert, Leona
author_sort Garg, Kunal
collection PubMed
description Human polymicrobial infections in tick-borne disease (TBD) patients is an emerging public health theme. However, the requirement for holistic TBD tests in routine clinical laboratories is ambiguous. TICKPLEX(®) PLUS is a holistic TBD test utilized herein to assess the need for multiplex and multifunctional diagnostic tools in a routine clinical laboratory. The study involved 150 specimens categorized into Lyme disease (LD)-positive (n = 48), LD-negative (n = 30), and febrile patients from whom borrelia serology was requested (n = 72, later “febrile patients”) based on reference test results from United Medix, Finland. Reference tests from DiaSorin, Immunetics, and Mikrogen Diagnostik followed the two-tier LD testing system. A comparison between the reference tests and TICKPLEX(®) PLUS produced 86%, 88%, and 87% positive, negative, and overall agreement, respectively. Additionally, up to 15% of LD and 11% of febrile patients responded to TBD related coinfections and opportunistic microbes. The results demonstrated that one (TICKPLEX(®) PLUS) test can aid in a LD diagnosis instead of four tests. Moreover, TBD is not limited to just LD, as the specimens produced immune responses to several TBD microbes. Lastly, the study indicated that the screening of febrile patients for TBDs could be a missed opportunity at reducing unreported patient cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8005980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80059802021-03-30 Assessing the Need for Multiplex and Multifunctional Tick-Borne Disease Test in Routine Clinical Laboratory Samples from Lyme Disease and Febrile Patients with a History of a Tick Bite Garg, Kunal Jokiranta, T. Sakari Filén, Sanna Gilbert, Leona Trop Med Infect Dis Article Human polymicrobial infections in tick-borne disease (TBD) patients is an emerging public health theme. However, the requirement for holistic TBD tests in routine clinical laboratories is ambiguous. TICKPLEX(®) PLUS is a holistic TBD test utilized herein to assess the need for multiplex and multifunctional diagnostic tools in a routine clinical laboratory. The study involved 150 specimens categorized into Lyme disease (LD)-positive (n = 48), LD-negative (n = 30), and febrile patients from whom borrelia serology was requested (n = 72, later “febrile patients”) based on reference test results from United Medix, Finland. Reference tests from DiaSorin, Immunetics, and Mikrogen Diagnostik followed the two-tier LD testing system. A comparison between the reference tests and TICKPLEX(®) PLUS produced 86%, 88%, and 87% positive, negative, and overall agreement, respectively. Additionally, up to 15% of LD and 11% of febrile patients responded to TBD related coinfections and opportunistic microbes. The results demonstrated that one (TICKPLEX(®) PLUS) test can aid in a LD diagnosis instead of four tests. Moreover, TBD is not limited to just LD, as the specimens produced immune responses to several TBD microbes. Lastly, the study indicated that the screening of febrile patients for TBDs could be a missed opportunity at reducing unreported patient cases. MDPI 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8005980/ /pubmed/33803065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6010038 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Garg, Kunal
Jokiranta, T. Sakari
Filén, Sanna
Gilbert, Leona
Assessing the Need for Multiplex and Multifunctional Tick-Borne Disease Test in Routine Clinical Laboratory Samples from Lyme Disease and Febrile Patients with a History of a Tick Bite
title Assessing the Need for Multiplex and Multifunctional Tick-Borne Disease Test in Routine Clinical Laboratory Samples from Lyme Disease and Febrile Patients with a History of a Tick Bite
title_full Assessing the Need for Multiplex and Multifunctional Tick-Borne Disease Test in Routine Clinical Laboratory Samples from Lyme Disease and Febrile Patients with a History of a Tick Bite
title_fullStr Assessing the Need for Multiplex and Multifunctional Tick-Borne Disease Test in Routine Clinical Laboratory Samples from Lyme Disease and Febrile Patients with a History of a Tick Bite
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Need for Multiplex and Multifunctional Tick-Borne Disease Test in Routine Clinical Laboratory Samples from Lyme Disease and Febrile Patients with a History of a Tick Bite
title_short Assessing the Need for Multiplex and Multifunctional Tick-Borne Disease Test in Routine Clinical Laboratory Samples from Lyme Disease and Febrile Patients with a History of a Tick Bite
title_sort assessing the need for multiplex and multifunctional tick-borne disease test in routine clinical laboratory samples from lyme disease and febrile patients with a history of a tick bite
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8005980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33803065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6010038
work_keys_str_mv AT gargkunal assessingtheneedformultiplexandmultifunctionaltickbornediseasetestinroutineclinicallaboratorysamplesfromlymediseaseandfebrilepatientswithahistoryofatickbite
AT jokirantatsakari assessingtheneedformultiplexandmultifunctionaltickbornediseasetestinroutineclinicallaboratorysamplesfromlymediseaseandfebrilepatientswithahistoryofatickbite
AT filensanna assessingtheneedformultiplexandmultifunctionaltickbornediseasetestinroutineclinicallaboratorysamplesfromlymediseaseandfebrilepatientswithahistoryofatickbite
AT gilbertleona assessingtheneedformultiplexandmultifunctionaltickbornediseasetestinroutineclinicallaboratorysamplesfromlymediseaseandfebrilepatientswithahistoryofatickbite