Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Once daily tacrolimus regimen was found to exhibits similar bioavailability, safety and efficacy properties compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplantation patients. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily prolonged release tacrolimus compared to twice-daily ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bzeizi, Khalid Ibrahim, Albenmousa, Ali, Shawkat, Abdulhaleem Mohamed, Ahmed, Zidan, Alabbad, Saleh, Al-hamoudi, Waleed, Troisi, Roberto, Broering, Deiter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815679
http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i3.375
_version_ 1783672241723015168
author Bzeizi, Khalid Ibrahim
Albenmousa, Ali
Shawkat, Abdulhaleem Mohamed
Ahmed, Zidan
Alabbad, Saleh
Al-hamoudi, Waleed
Troisi, Roberto
Broering, Deiter
author_facet Bzeizi, Khalid Ibrahim
Albenmousa, Ali
Shawkat, Abdulhaleem Mohamed
Ahmed, Zidan
Alabbad, Saleh
Al-hamoudi, Waleed
Troisi, Roberto
Broering, Deiter
author_sort Bzeizi, Khalid Ibrahim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Once daily tacrolimus regimen was found to exhibits similar bioavailability, safety and efficacy properties compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplantation patients. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily prolonged release tacrolimus compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in liver transplantation patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL databases were searched for clinical trials until December 2020. Efficacy outcome measured as the rate of treatment failure indicated by biopsy-proven acute rejection, Serum creatinine, graft loss, or death. Two reviewers independently selected studies, collected data and assessed risk of bias. The results are reported as risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous data. RESULTS: Seven studies included with 965 patients. All the included studies were of moderate quality according to the risk of bias assessment using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was reported in four studies, and pooled analysis of those studies indicated similar rejections in both twice daily and once daily tacrolimus groups (risk ratio: 1.06, 95%CI: 0.84-1.34, n = 758, I(2 )= 0%) and also we found no significant difference between both groups for renal outcome (serum creatinine; mean difference, 0.001 mg/dL, 95%CI: -0.042 to 0.043, n = 846, I(2) = 18.6%). Similarly, there was similar number of adverse events such as hypertension, headache, back pain, blood related disorders, infections and nausea observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: The analysis findings confirm that both once daily and twice daily tacrolimus formulations are comparable in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8006077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80060772021-04-01 Efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation Bzeizi, Khalid Ibrahim Albenmousa, Ali Shawkat, Abdulhaleem Mohamed Ahmed, Zidan Alabbad, Saleh Al-hamoudi, Waleed Troisi, Roberto Broering, Deiter World J Hepatol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Once daily tacrolimus regimen was found to exhibits similar bioavailability, safety and efficacy properties compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplantation patients. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily prolonged release tacrolimus compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in liver transplantation patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL databases were searched for clinical trials until December 2020. Efficacy outcome measured as the rate of treatment failure indicated by biopsy-proven acute rejection, Serum creatinine, graft loss, or death. Two reviewers independently selected studies, collected data and assessed risk of bias. The results are reported as risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous data. RESULTS: Seven studies included with 965 patients. All the included studies were of moderate quality according to the risk of bias assessment using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was reported in four studies, and pooled analysis of those studies indicated similar rejections in both twice daily and once daily tacrolimus groups (risk ratio: 1.06, 95%CI: 0.84-1.34, n = 758, I(2 )= 0%) and also we found no significant difference between both groups for renal outcome (serum creatinine; mean difference, 0.001 mg/dL, 95%CI: -0.042 to 0.043, n = 846, I(2) = 18.6%). Similarly, there was similar number of adverse events such as hypertension, headache, back pain, blood related disorders, infections and nausea observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: The analysis findings confirm that both once daily and twice daily tacrolimus formulations are comparable in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-03-27 2021-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8006077/ /pubmed/33815679 http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i3.375 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Bzeizi, Khalid Ibrahim
Albenmousa, Ali
Shawkat, Abdulhaleem Mohamed
Ahmed, Zidan
Alabbad, Saleh
Al-hamoudi, Waleed
Troisi, Roberto
Broering, Deiter
Efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation
title Efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation
title_full Efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation
title_short Efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation
title_sort efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815679
http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i3.375
work_keys_str_mv AT bzeizikhalidibrahim efficacyandsafetyofoncedailytacrolimuscomparedtotwicedailytacrolimusafterlivertransplantation
AT albenmousaali efficacyandsafetyofoncedailytacrolimuscomparedtotwicedailytacrolimusafterlivertransplantation
AT shawkatabdulhaleemmohamed efficacyandsafetyofoncedailytacrolimuscomparedtotwicedailytacrolimusafterlivertransplantation
AT ahmedzidan efficacyandsafetyofoncedailytacrolimuscomparedtotwicedailytacrolimusafterlivertransplantation
AT alabbadsaleh efficacyandsafetyofoncedailytacrolimuscomparedtotwicedailytacrolimusafterlivertransplantation
AT alhamoudiwaleed efficacyandsafetyofoncedailytacrolimuscomparedtotwicedailytacrolimusafterlivertransplantation
AT troisiroberto efficacyandsafetyofoncedailytacrolimuscomparedtotwicedailytacrolimusafterlivertransplantation
AT broeringdeiter efficacyandsafetyofoncedailytacrolimuscomparedtotwicedailytacrolimusafterlivertransplantation