Cargando…
Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010
Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders (“conditions”) then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns7010015 |
_version_ | 1783672269320486912 |
---|---|
author | Loeber, J. Gerard Platis, Dimitris Zetterström, Rolf H. Almashanu, Shlomo Boemer, François Bonham, James R. Borde, Patricia Brincat, Ian Cheillan, David Dekkers, Eugenie Dimitrov, Dobry Fingerhut, Ralph Franzson, Leifur Groselj, Urh Hougaard, David Knapkova, Maria Kocova, Mirjana Kotori, Vjosa Kozich, Viktor Kremezna, Anastasiia Kurkijärvi, Riikka La Marca, Giancarlo Mikelsaar, Ruth Milenkovic, Tatjana Mitkin, Vyacheslav Moldovanu, Florentina Ceglarek, Uta O’Grady, Loretta Oltarzewski, Mariusz Pettersen, Rolf D. Ramadza, Danijela Salimbayeva, Damilya Samardzic, Mira Shamsiddinova, Markhabo Songailiené, Jurgita Szatmari, Ildiko Tabatadze, Nazi Tezel, Basak Toromanovic, Alma Tovmasyan, Irina Usurelu, Natalia Vevere, Parsla Vilarinho, Laura Vogazianos, Marios Yahyaoui, Raquel Zeyda, Maximilian Schielen, Peter C.J.I. |
author_facet | Loeber, J. Gerard Platis, Dimitris Zetterström, Rolf H. Almashanu, Shlomo Boemer, François Bonham, James R. Borde, Patricia Brincat, Ian Cheillan, David Dekkers, Eugenie Dimitrov, Dobry Fingerhut, Ralph Franzson, Leifur Groselj, Urh Hougaard, David Knapkova, Maria Kocova, Mirjana Kotori, Vjosa Kozich, Viktor Kremezna, Anastasiia Kurkijärvi, Riikka La Marca, Giancarlo Mikelsaar, Ruth Milenkovic, Tatjana Mitkin, Vyacheslav Moldovanu, Florentina Ceglarek, Uta O’Grady, Loretta Oltarzewski, Mariusz Pettersen, Rolf D. Ramadza, Danijela Salimbayeva, Damilya Samardzic, Mira Shamsiddinova, Markhabo Songailiené, Jurgita Szatmari, Ildiko Tabatadze, Nazi Tezel, Basak Toromanovic, Alma Tovmasyan, Irina Usurelu, Natalia Vevere, Parsla Vilarinho, Laura Vogazianos, Marios Yahyaoui, Raquel Zeyda, Maximilian Schielen, Peter C.J.I. |
author_sort | Loeber, J. Gerard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders (“conditions”) then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for 40–50 conditions using a single blood spot. The most recent additions to screening programmes (screening for cystic fibrosis, severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy) were assisted by or realised through the introduction of molecular technologies. For this survey, we collected data from 51 European countries. We report the developments between 2010 and 2020 and highlight the achievements reached with the progress made in this period. We also identify areas where further progress can be made, mainly by exchanging knowledge and learning from experiences in neighbouring countries. Between 2010 and 2020, most NBS programmes in geographical Europe matured considerably, both in terms of methodology (modernised) and with regard to the panel of conditions screened (expanded). These developments indicate that more collaboration in Europe through European organisations is gaining momentum. We can only accomplish the timely detection of newborn infants potentially suffering from one of the many rare diseases and take appropriate action by working together. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8006225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80062252021-03-30 Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010 Loeber, J. Gerard Platis, Dimitris Zetterström, Rolf H. Almashanu, Shlomo Boemer, François Bonham, James R. Borde, Patricia Brincat, Ian Cheillan, David Dekkers, Eugenie Dimitrov, Dobry Fingerhut, Ralph Franzson, Leifur Groselj, Urh Hougaard, David Knapkova, Maria Kocova, Mirjana Kotori, Vjosa Kozich, Viktor Kremezna, Anastasiia Kurkijärvi, Riikka La Marca, Giancarlo Mikelsaar, Ruth Milenkovic, Tatjana Mitkin, Vyacheslav Moldovanu, Florentina Ceglarek, Uta O’Grady, Loretta Oltarzewski, Mariusz Pettersen, Rolf D. Ramadza, Danijela Salimbayeva, Damilya Samardzic, Mira Shamsiddinova, Markhabo Songailiené, Jurgita Szatmari, Ildiko Tabatadze, Nazi Tezel, Basak Toromanovic, Alma Tovmasyan, Irina Usurelu, Natalia Vevere, Parsla Vilarinho, Laura Vogazianos, Marios Yahyaoui, Raquel Zeyda, Maximilian Schielen, Peter C.J.I. Int J Neonatal Screen Article Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders (“conditions”) then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for 40–50 conditions using a single blood spot. The most recent additions to screening programmes (screening for cystic fibrosis, severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy) were assisted by or realised through the introduction of molecular technologies. For this survey, we collected data from 51 European countries. We report the developments between 2010 and 2020 and highlight the achievements reached with the progress made in this period. We also identify areas where further progress can be made, mainly by exchanging knowledge and learning from experiences in neighbouring countries. Between 2010 and 2020, most NBS programmes in geographical Europe matured considerably, both in terms of methodology (modernised) and with regard to the panel of conditions screened (expanded). These developments indicate that more collaboration in Europe through European organisations is gaining momentum. We can only accomplish the timely detection of newborn infants potentially suffering from one of the many rare diseases and take appropriate action by working together. MDPI 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8006225/ /pubmed/33808002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns7010015 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Loeber, J. Gerard Platis, Dimitris Zetterström, Rolf H. Almashanu, Shlomo Boemer, François Bonham, James R. Borde, Patricia Brincat, Ian Cheillan, David Dekkers, Eugenie Dimitrov, Dobry Fingerhut, Ralph Franzson, Leifur Groselj, Urh Hougaard, David Knapkova, Maria Kocova, Mirjana Kotori, Vjosa Kozich, Viktor Kremezna, Anastasiia Kurkijärvi, Riikka La Marca, Giancarlo Mikelsaar, Ruth Milenkovic, Tatjana Mitkin, Vyacheslav Moldovanu, Florentina Ceglarek, Uta O’Grady, Loretta Oltarzewski, Mariusz Pettersen, Rolf D. Ramadza, Danijela Salimbayeva, Damilya Samardzic, Mira Shamsiddinova, Markhabo Songailiené, Jurgita Szatmari, Ildiko Tabatadze, Nazi Tezel, Basak Toromanovic, Alma Tovmasyan, Irina Usurelu, Natalia Vevere, Parsla Vilarinho, Laura Vogazianos, Marios Yahyaoui, Raquel Zeyda, Maximilian Schielen, Peter C.J.I. Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010 |
title | Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010 |
title_full | Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010 |
title_fullStr | Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010 |
title_full_unstemmed | Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010 |
title_short | Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010 |
title_sort | neonatal screening in europe revisited: an isns perspective on the current state and developments since 2010 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns7010015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loeberjgerard neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT platisdimitris neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT zetterstromrolfh neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT almashanushlomo neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT boemerfrancois neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT bonhamjamesr neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT bordepatricia neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT brincatian neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT cheillandavid neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT dekkerseugenie neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT dimitrovdobry neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT fingerhutralph neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT franzsonleifur neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT groseljurh neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT hougaarddavid neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT knapkovamaria neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT kocovamirjana neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT kotorivjosa neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT kozichviktor neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT kremeznaanastasiia neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT kurkijarviriikka neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT lamarcagiancarlo neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT mikelsaarruth neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT milenkovictatjana neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT mitkinvyacheslav neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT moldovanuflorentina neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT ceglarekuta neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT ogradyloretta neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT oltarzewskimariusz neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT pettersenrolfd neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT ramadzadanijela neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT salimbayevadamilya neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT samardzicmira neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT shamsiddinovamarkhabo neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT songailienejurgita neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT szatmariildiko neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT tabatadzenazi neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT tezelbasak neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT toromanovicalma neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT tovmasyanirina neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT usurelunatalia neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT vevereparsla neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT vilarinholaura neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT vogazianosmarios neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT yahyaouiraquel neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT zeydamaximilian neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 AT schielenpetercji neonatalscreeningineuroperevisitedanisnsperspectiveonthecurrentstateanddevelopmentssince2010 |