Cargando…

Single-Pulse TMS to the Temporo-Occipital and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Evokes Lateralized Long Latency EEG Responses at the Stimulation Site

INTRODUCTION: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)–evoked potentials (TEPs) allow for probing cortical functions in health and pathology. However, there is uncertainty whether long-latency TMS-evoked potentials reflect functioning of the targeted cortical area. It has been suggested that componen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarczok, Tomasz A., Roebruck, Friederike, Pokorny, Lena, Biermann, Lea, Roessner, Veit, Klein, Christoph, Bender, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33790732
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.616667
_version_ 1783672284239626240
author Jarczok, Tomasz A.
Roebruck, Friederike
Pokorny, Lena
Biermann, Lea
Roessner, Veit
Klein, Christoph
Bender, Stephan
author_facet Jarczok, Tomasz A.
Roebruck, Friederike
Pokorny, Lena
Biermann, Lea
Roessner, Veit
Klein, Christoph
Bender, Stephan
author_sort Jarczok, Tomasz A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)–evoked potentials (TEPs) allow for probing cortical functions in health and pathology. However, there is uncertainty whether long-latency TMS-evoked potentials reflect functioning of the targeted cortical area. It has been suggested that components such as the TMS-evoked N100 are stereotypical and related to nonspecific sensory processes rather than transcranial effects of the changing magnetic field. In contrast, TEPs that vary according to the targeted brain region and are systematically lateralized toward the stimulated hemisphere can be considered to reflect activity in the stimulated brain region resulting from transcranial electromagnetic induction. METHODS: TMS with concurrent 64-channel electroencephalography (EEG) was sequentially performed in homologous areas of both hemispheres. One sample of healthy adults received TMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; another sample received TMS to the temporo-occipital cortex. We analyzed late negative TEP deflections corresponding to the N100 component in motor cortex stimulation. RESULTS: TEP topography varied according to the stimulation target site. Long-latency negative TEP deflections were systematically lateralized (higher in ipsilateral compared to contralateral electrodes) in electrodes over the stimulated brain region. A calculation that removes evoked components that are not systematically lateralized relative to the stimulated hemisphere revealed negative maxima located around the respective target sites. CONCLUSION: TEPs contain long-latency negative components that are lateralized toward the stimulated hemisphere and have their topographic maxima at the respective stimulation sites. They can be differentiated from co-occurring components that are invariable across different stimulation sites (probably reflecting coactivation of peripheral sensory afferences) according to their spatiotemporal patterns. Lateralized long-latency TEP components located at the stimulation site likely reflect activity evoked in the targeted cortex region by direct transcranial effects and are therefore suitable for assessing cortical functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8006291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80062912021-03-30 Single-Pulse TMS to the Temporo-Occipital and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Evokes Lateralized Long Latency EEG Responses at the Stimulation Site Jarczok, Tomasz A. Roebruck, Friederike Pokorny, Lena Biermann, Lea Roessner, Veit Klein, Christoph Bender, Stephan Front Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)–evoked potentials (TEPs) allow for probing cortical functions in health and pathology. However, there is uncertainty whether long-latency TMS-evoked potentials reflect functioning of the targeted cortical area. It has been suggested that components such as the TMS-evoked N100 are stereotypical and related to nonspecific sensory processes rather than transcranial effects of the changing magnetic field. In contrast, TEPs that vary according to the targeted brain region and are systematically lateralized toward the stimulated hemisphere can be considered to reflect activity in the stimulated brain region resulting from transcranial electromagnetic induction. METHODS: TMS with concurrent 64-channel electroencephalography (EEG) was sequentially performed in homologous areas of both hemispheres. One sample of healthy adults received TMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; another sample received TMS to the temporo-occipital cortex. We analyzed late negative TEP deflections corresponding to the N100 component in motor cortex stimulation. RESULTS: TEP topography varied according to the stimulation target site. Long-latency negative TEP deflections were systematically lateralized (higher in ipsilateral compared to contralateral electrodes) in electrodes over the stimulated brain region. A calculation that removes evoked components that are not systematically lateralized relative to the stimulated hemisphere revealed negative maxima located around the respective target sites. CONCLUSION: TEPs contain long-latency negative components that are lateralized toward the stimulated hemisphere and have their topographic maxima at the respective stimulation sites. They can be differentiated from co-occurring components that are invariable across different stimulation sites (probably reflecting coactivation of peripheral sensory afferences) according to their spatiotemporal patterns. Lateralized long-latency TEP components located at the stimulation site likely reflect activity evoked in the targeted cortex region by direct transcranial effects and are therefore suitable for assessing cortical functions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8006291/ /pubmed/33790732 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.616667 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jarczok, Roebruck, Pokorny, Biermann, Roessner, Klein and Bender. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Jarczok, Tomasz A.
Roebruck, Friederike
Pokorny, Lena
Biermann, Lea
Roessner, Veit
Klein, Christoph
Bender, Stephan
Single-Pulse TMS to the Temporo-Occipital and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Evokes Lateralized Long Latency EEG Responses at the Stimulation Site
title Single-Pulse TMS to the Temporo-Occipital and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Evokes Lateralized Long Latency EEG Responses at the Stimulation Site
title_full Single-Pulse TMS to the Temporo-Occipital and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Evokes Lateralized Long Latency EEG Responses at the Stimulation Site
title_fullStr Single-Pulse TMS to the Temporo-Occipital and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Evokes Lateralized Long Latency EEG Responses at the Stimulation Site
title_full_unstemmed Single-Pulse TMS to the Temporo-Occipital and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Evokes Lateralized Long Latency EEG Responses at the Stimulation Site
title_short Single-Pulse TMS to the Temporo-Occipital and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Evokes Lateralized Long Latency EEG Responses at the Stimulation Site
title_sort single-pulse tms to the temporo-occipital and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex evokes lateralized long latency eeg responses at the stimulation site
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33790732
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.616667
work_keys_str_mv AT jarczoktomasza singlepulsetmstothetemporooccipitalanddorsolateralprefrontalcortexevokeslateralizedlonglatencyeegresponsesatthestimulationsite
AT roebruckfriederike singlepulsetmstothetemporooccipitalanddorsolateralprefrontalcortexevokeslateralizedlonglatencyeegresponsesatthestimulationsite
AT pokornylena singlepulsetmstothetemporooccipitalanddorsolateralprefrontalcortexevokeslateralizedlonglatencyeegresponsesatthestimulationsite
AT biermannlea singlepulsetmstothetemporooccipitalanddorsolateralprefrontalcortexevokeslateralizedlonglatencyeegresponsesatthestimulationsite
AT roessnerveit singlepulsetmstothetemporooccipitalanddorsolateralprefrontalcortexevokeslateralizedlonglatencyeegresponsesatthestimulationsite
AT kleinchristoph singlepulsetmstothetemporooccipitalanddorsolateralprefrontalcortexevokeslateralizedlonglatencyeegresponsesatthestimulationsite
AT benderstephan singlepulsetmstothetemporooccipitalanddorsolateralprefrontalcortexevokeslateralizedlonglatencyeegresponsesatthestimulationsite