Cargando…

Comparison of neuromuscular blockade recovery co-administered with neostigmine and different doses of calcium gluconate: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Calcium increases the probability of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction. It is not known whether there is a dose-dependent relationship between the dosage of calcium gluconate and the probability of transmitter release for non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, So Ron, Kim, Jeong Ho, Lee, Kyung Hyun, Park, Sang Yoong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01316-7
_version_ 1783672305528864768
author Choi, So Ron
Kim, Jeong Ho
Lee, Kyung Hyun
Park, Sang Yoong
author_facet Choi, So Ron
Kim, Jeong Ho
Lee, Kyung Hyun
Park, Sang Yoong
author_sort Choi, So Ron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Calcium increases the probability of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction. It is not known whether there is a dose-dependent relationship between the dosage of calcium gluconate and the probability of transmitter release for non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) recovery by acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AchEIs). This study compared the neuromuscular recovery time and the incidence of postoperative residual curarization (PORC) according to the dosage of calcium gluconate co-administered with neostigmine in three patient groups. METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to a control group, a 5 mg/kg calcium gluconate group (calcium 5 group), or a 10 mg/kg calcium gluconate group (calcium 10 group). In patients with a TOF ratio (TOFr) between 0.2–0.7, 0.04 mg/kg of neostigmine was administered and both 0.2 mg of glycopyrrolate and 0.4 mg of atropine per 1 mg of neostigmine were administered. And additional 5 or 10 mg/kg of calcium gluconate were administrated to the calcium 5 and 10 groups. The primary endpoint was neuromuscular recovery time (the time between reversal and TOFr≥0.9). The secondary endpoints were the incidence of PORC at 5, 10, and 20 min after reversal administration and the train-of-four ratio (TOFr) at each time point. RESULTS: The neuromuscular recovery time was 5.3 min in the control group, 3.9 min in the calcium 5 group, and 4.1 min in the calcium 10 group, respectively (P = 0.004). The incidence of PORC at 5 min after neostigmine administration was 12 in the control group, 4 in the calcium 5 group, and 4 in the calcium 10 group, respectively, with statistical significance (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The co-administration of calcium gluconate with neostigmine safely promoted early NMB recovery, and the neuromuscular recovery time of the calcium 10 group tended to be more evenly distributed than that of the calcium 5 group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp(KCT0004182). Date of registration: August 122,019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8006387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80063872021-03-30 Comparison of neuromuscular blockade recovery co-administered with neostigmine and different doses of calcium gluconate: a randomized control trial Choi, So Ron Kim, Jeong Ho Lee, Kyung Hyun Park, Sang Yoong BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Calcium increases the probability of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction. It is not known whether there is a dose-dependent relationship between the dosage of calcium gluconate and the probability of transmitter release for non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) recovery by acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AchEIs). This study compared the neuromuscular recovery time and the incidence of postoperative residual curarization (PORC) according to the dosage of calcium gluconate co-administered with neostigmine in three patient groups. METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to a control group, a 5 mg/kg calcium gluconate group (calcium 5 group), or a 10 mg/kg calcium gluconate group (calcium 10 group). In patients with a TOF ratio (TOFr) between 0.2–0.7, 0.04 mg/kg of neostigmine was administered and both 0.2 mg of glycopyrrolate and 0.4 mg of atropine per 1 mg of neostigmine were administered. And additional 5 or 10 mg/kg of calcium gluconate were administrated to the calcium 5 and 10 groups. The primary endpoint was neuromuscular recovery time (the time between reversal and TOFr≥0.9). The secondary endpoints were the incidence of PORC at 5, 10, and 20 min after reversal administration and the train-of-four ratio (TOFr) at each time point. RESULTS: The neuromuscular recovery time was 5.3 min in the control group, 3.9 min in the calcium 5 group, and 4.1 min in the calcium 10 group, respectively (P = 0.004). The incidence of PORC at 5 min after neostigmine administration was 12 in the control group, 4 in the calcium 5 group, and 4 in the calcium 10 group, respectively, with statistical significance (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The co-administration of calcium gluconate with neostigmine safely promoted early NMB recovery, and the neuromuscular recovery time of the calcium 10 group tended to be more evenly distributed than that of the calcium 5 group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp(KCT0004182). Date of registration: August 122,019. BioMed Central 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8006387/ /pubmed/33781234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01316-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Choi, So Ron
Kim, Jeong Ho
Lee, Kyung Hyun
Park, Sang Yoong
Comparison of neuromuscular blockade recovery co-administered with neostigmine and different doses of calcium gluconate: a randomized control trial
title Comparison of neuromuscular blockade recovery co-administered with neostigmine and different doses of calcium gluconate: a randomized control trial
title_full Comparison of neuromuscular blockade recovery co-administered with neostigmine and different doses of calcium gluconate: a randomized control trial
title_fullStr Comparison of neuromuscular blockade recovery co-administered with neostigmine and different doses of calcium gluconate: a randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of neuromuscular blockade recovery co-administered with neostigmine and different doses of calcium gluconate: a randomized control trial
title_short Comparison of neuromuscular blockade recovery co-administered with neostigmine and different doses of calcium gluconate: a randomized control trial
title_sort comparison of neuromuscular blockade recovery co-administered with neostigmine and different doses of calcium gluconate: a randomized control trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01316-7
work_keys_str_mv AT choisoron comparisonofneuromuscularblockaderecoverycoadministeredwithneostigmineanddifferentdosesofcalciumgluconatearandomizedcontroltrial
AT kimjeongho comparisonofneuromuscularblockaderecoverycoadministeredwithneostigmineanddifferentdosesofcalciumgluconatearandomizedcontroltrial
AT leekyunghyun comparisonofneuromuscularblockaderecoverycoadministeredwithneostigmineanddifferentdosesofcalciumgluconatearandomizedcontroltrial
AT parksangyoong comparisonofneuromuscularblockaderecoverycoadministeredwithneostigmineanddifferentdosesofcalciumgluconatearandomizedcontroltrial