Cargando…

Single-Setting Superior Vena Cava Biopsy and Stenting Utilizing Cone Beam Computed Tomography as an Additional Tool

Case series Patients: Male, 68-year-old • Male, 55-year-old • Female, 43-year-old • Male, 69-year-old • Male, 67-year-old Final Diagnosis: Superior vena cava syndrome Symptoms: Dilated veins • facial swelling • shortness of breath Medication: — Clinical Procedure: Biopsy • stenting Specialty: Oncolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Daniel Yuxuan, Quek, Lawrence Han Hwee, Huang, Ivan Kuang Hsin, Lim, Gavin Hock Tai, Chan, Gabriel, Wu, Yi-Wei, Ryu, Seung Wook, Pua, Uei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33750755
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.929048
Descripción
Sumario:Case series Patients: Male, 68-year-old • Male, 55-year-old • Female, 43-year-old • Male, 69-year-old • Male, 67-year-old Final Diagnosis: Superior vena cava syndrome Symptoms: Dilated veins • facial swelling • shortness of breath Medication: — Clinical Procedure: Biopsy • stenting Specialty: Oncology OBJECTIVE: Management of emergency care BACKGROUND: Malignant disease is a common etiology of superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). Being a medical emergency, it often requires rapid diagnostic evaluation and therapy. Transcaval biopsy and endovascular stenting in a single-setting has been described, but only in a handful of cases. These cases utilized intra-operative venograms. In this study, we also used intra-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to increase the safety and efficacy of such single-setting procedures. CASE REPORTS: From January 2017 to July 2019, there were 5 patients with malignant SVCS who underwent single-setting superior vena cava biopsy and endovascular stenting utilizing intra-operative CBCT as an adjunct. Demographic data, clinical presentation, investigation results, procedural details, and patient outcomes were recorded. CBCT was utilized in all cases to optimize sampling of biopsies, visualize subsequent stent positioning, and for early detection of procedure-related complications. Transcaval biopsy was diagnostic in 4 of the 5 patients. Endovascular stents were deployed successfully in all cases, with post-stenting venogram demonstrating relief of prior obstructed segments. One patient had a complication of an apical pneumothorax, with no associated long-term pneumothorax-related morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that single-setting transcaval biopsy and stenting in the context of malignant SVCS is a cost-efficient, safe, and feasible approach. In addition, the additional use of intra-operative CBCT is a useful tool to increase procedure efficacy and safety.