Cargando…

In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for alternative short-term, reliable means to aid in the treatment of patients requiring ventilatory support. Concurrent aerosol drug delivery is often prescribed to such patients. As such, this study examines one such short-term option, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mac Giolla Eain, Marc, O'Sullivan, Andrew, Joyce, Mary, MacLoughlin, Ronan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000739
_version_ 1783672380877438976
author Mac Giolla Eain, Marc
O'Sullivan, Andrew
Joyce, Mary
MacLoughlin, Ronan
author_facet Mac Giolla Eain, Marc
O'Sullivan, Andrew
Joyce, Mary
MacLoughlin, Ronan
author_sort Mac Giolla Eain, Marc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for alternative short-term, reliable means to aid in the treatment of patients requiring ventilatory support. Concurrent aerosol drug delivery is often prescribed to such patients. As such, this study examines one such short-term option, the disposable gas-powered transport ventilator to effectively deliver aerosol therapy. Factors such as aerosol generator type, patient breathing pattern, humidification and nebuliser position within the respiratory circuit were also examined. METHODS: Aerosol drug delivery characterisation was undertaken using two different disposable transport ventilators (DTVs). Two different nebuliser types, a closed circuit vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) and an open circuit jet nebuliser (JN), at different locations in a respiratory circuit, proximal and distal to an endotracheal tube (ETT), with and without passive humidification, were evaluated in simulated adult and paediatric patients. RESULTS: Placement of a nebuliser proximal to the ETT (VMN: 25.19%–34.15% and JN: 3.14%–8.92%), and the addition of a heat and moisture exchange filter (VMN: 32.37%–40.43% and JN: 5.60%–9.91%) resulted in the largest potential lung dose in the adult patient model. Irrespective of nebuliser position and humidification in the respiratory circuit, use of the VMN resulted in the largest potential lung dose (%). A similar trend was recorded in the paediatric model data, where the largest potential lung dose was recorded with both nebuliser types placed proximal to the ETT (VMN: 8.12%–10.89% and JN: 2.15%–3.82%). However, the addition of a heat and moisture exchange filter had no statistically significant effect on the potential lung dose (%) a paediatric patient would receive (p>>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that transport ventilators, such as DTVs, can be used concurrently with aerosol generators to effectively deliver aerosolised medication in both adult and paediatric patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8006849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80068492021-04-16 In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy Mac Giolla Eain, Marc O'Sullivan, Andrew Joyce, Mary MacLoughlin, Ronan BMJ Open Respir Res Respiratory Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for alternative short-term, reliable means to aid in the treatment of patients requiring ventilatory support. Concurrent aerosol drug delivery is often prescribed to such patients. As such, this study examines one such short-term option, the disposable gas-powered transport ventilator to effectively deliver aerosol therapy. Factors such as aerosol generator type, patient breathing pattern, humidification and nebuliser position within the respiratory circuit were also examined. METHODS: Aerosol drug delivery characterisation was undertaken using two different disposable transport ventilators (DTVs). Two different nebuliser types, a closed circuit vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) and an open circuit jet nebuliser (JN), at different locations in a respiratory circuit, proximal and distal to an endotracheal tube (ETT), with and without passive humidification, were evaluated in simulated adult and paediatric patients. RESULTS: Placement of a nebuliser proximal to the ETT (VMN: 25.19%–34.15% and JN: 3.14%–8.92%), and the addition of a heat and moisture exchange filter (VMN: 32.37%–40.43% and JN: 5.60%–9.91%) resulted in the largest potential lung dose in the adult patient model. Irrespective of nebuliser position and humidification in the respiratory circuit, use of the VMN resulted in the largest potential lung dose (%). A similar trend was recorded in the paediatric model data, where the largest potential lung dose was recorded with both nebuliser types placed proximal to the ETT (VMN: 8.12%–10.89% and JN: 2.15%–3.82%). However, the addition of a heat and moisture exchange filter had no statistically significant effect on the potential lung dose (%) a paediatric patient would receive (p>>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that transport ventilators, such as DTVs, can be used concurrently with aerosol generators to effectively deliver aerosolised medication in both adult and paediatric patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8006849/ /pubmed/33771812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000739 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Respiratory Research
Mac Giolla Eain, Marc
O'Sullivan, Andrew
Joyce, Mary
MacLoughlin, Ronan
In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy
title In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy
title_full In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy
title_fullStr In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy
title_full_unstemmed In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy
title_short In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy
title_sort in vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy
topic Respiratory Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000739
work_keys_str_mv AT macgiollaeainmarc invitroevaluationofdisposabletransportventilatorswithcombinationaerosoltherapy
AT osullivanandrew invitroevaluationofdisposabletransportventilatorswithcombinationaerosoltherapy
AT joycemary invitroevaluationofdisposabletransportventilatorswithcombinationaerosoltherapy
AT macloughlinronan invitroevaluationofdisposabletransportventilatorswithcombinationaerosoltherapy