Cargando…
In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for alternative short-term, reliable means to aid in the treatment of patients requiring ventilatory support. Concurrent aerosol drug delivery is often prescribed to such patients. As such, this study examines one such short-term option, the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000739 |
_version_ | 1783672380877438976 |
---|---|
author | Mac Giolla Eain, Marc O'Sullivan, Andrew Joyce, Mary MacLoughlin, Ronan |
author_facet | Mac Giolla Eain, Marc O'Sullivan, Andrew Joyce, Mary MacLoughlin, Ronan |
author_sort | Mac Giolla Eain, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for alternative short-term, reliable means to aid in the treatment of patients requiring ventilatory support. Concurrent aerosol drug delivery is often prescribed to such patients. As such, this study examines one such short-term option, the disposable gas-powered transport ventilator to effectively deliver aerosol therapy. Factors such as aerosol generator type, patient breathing pattern, humidification and nebuliser position within the respiratory circuit were also examined. METHODS: Aerosol drug delivery characterisation was undertaken using two different disposable transport ventilators (DTVs). Two different nebuliser types, a closed circuit vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) and an open circuit jet nebuliser (JN), at different locations in a respiratory circuit, proximal and distal to an endotracheal tube (ETT), with and without passive humidification, were evaluated in simulated adult and paediatric patients. RESULTS: Placement of a nebuliser proximal to the ETT (VMN: 25.19%–34.15% and JN: 3.14%–8.92%), and the addition of a heat and moisture exchange filter (VMN: 32.37%–40.43% and JN: 5.60%–9.91%) resulted in the largest potential lung dose in the adult patient model. Irrespective of nebuliser position and humidification in the respiratory circuit, use of the VMN resulted in the largest potential lung dose (%). A similar trend was recorded in the paediatric model data, where the largest potential lung dose was recorded with both nebuliser types placed proximal to the ETT (VMN: 8.12%–10.89% and JN: 2.15%–3.82%). However, the addition of a heat and moisture exchange filter had no statistically significant effect on the potential lung dose (%) a paediatric patient would receive (p>>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that transport ventilators, such as DTVs, can be used concurrently with aerosol generators to effectively deliver aerosolised medication in both adult and paediatric patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8006849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80068492021-04-16 In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy Mac Giolla Eain, Marc O'Sullivan, Andrew Joyce, Mary MacLoughlin, Ronan BMJ Open Respir Res Respiratory Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for alternative short-term, reliable means to aid in the treatment of patients requiring ventilatory support. Concurrent aerosol drug delivery is often prescribed to such patients. As such, this study examines one such short-term option, the disposable gas-powered transport ventilator to effectively deliver aerosol therapy. Factors such as aerosol generator type, patient breathing pattern, humidification and nebuliser position within the respiratory circuit were also examined. METHODS: Aerosol drug delivery characterisation was undertaken using two different disposable transport ventilators (DTVs). Two different nebuliser types, a closed circuit vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) and an open circuit jet nebuliser (JN), at different locations in a respiratory circuit, proximal and distal to an endotracheal tube (ETT), with and without passive humidification, were evaluated in simulated adult and paediatric patients. RESULTS: Placement of a nebuliser proximal to the ETT (VMN: 25.19%–34.15% and JN: 3.14%–8.92%), and the addition of a heat and moisture exchange filter (VMN: 32.37%–40.43% and JN: 5.60%–9.91%) resulted in the largest potential lung dose in the adult patient model. Irrespective of nebuliser position and humidification in the respiratory circuit, use of the VMN resulted in the largest potential lung dose (%). A similar trend was recorded in the paediatric model data, where the largest potential lung dose was recorded with both nebuliser types placed proximal to the ETT (VMN: 8.12%–10.89% and JN: 2.15%–3.82%). However, the addition of a heat and moisture exchange filter had no statistically significant effect on the potential lung dose (%) a paediatric patient would receive (p>>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that transport ventilators, such as DTVs, can be used concurrently with aerosol generators to effectively deliver aerosolised medication in both adult and paediatric patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8006849/ /pubmed/33771812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000739 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Respiratory Research Mac Giolla Eain, Marc O'Sullivan, Andrew Joyce, Mary MacLoughlin, Ronan In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy |
title | In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy |
title_full | In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy |
title_fullStr | In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy |
title_short | In vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy |
title_sort | in vitro evaluation of disposable transport ventilators with combination aerosol therapy |
topic | Respiratory Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33771812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macgiollaeainmarc invitroevaluationofdisposabletransportventilatorswithcombinationaerosoltherapy AT osullivanandrew invitroevaluationofdisposabletransportventilatorswithcombinationaerosoltherapy AT joycemary invitroevaluationofdisposabletransportventilatorswithcombinationaerosoltherapy AT macloughlinronan invitroevaluationofdisposabletransportventilatorswithcombinationaerosoltherapy |