Cargando…

Hypnosis and progressive muscle relaxation for anxiolysis and pain control during extraction procedure in 8–12-year-old children: a randomized control trial

INTRODUCTION: Hypnosis (H) and Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) have proven to be effective in a variety of medical settings; there is a paucity of their practical application in paediatric dentistry. The study aimed to comparatively evaluate the role of H and PMR on anxiety, heart rate (HR), oxy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabherwal, P., Kalra, N., Tyagi, R., Khatri, A., Srivastava, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00619-0
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Hypnosis (H) and Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) have proven to be effective in a variety of medical settings; there is a paucity of their practical application in paediatric dentistry. The study aimed to comparatively evaluate the role of H and PMR on anxiety, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SPO(2)), blood pressure (BP), pain, and analgesic requirement during extraction in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty children aged 8–12 years undergoing primary molar extractions were randomly allocated to three groups—H, PMR, and control (C). The anxiety (proposed Visual Facial Anxiety scale), HR, and SPO(2) were measured pre/post-operatively with/without interventions (H, PMR, C) at 4 intervals. The BP and pain (Wong-Baker faces pain scale) were recorded pre- and post-operatively. Need for analgesic post-operatively was assessed. RESULTS: Statistically significant reduction in anxiety was noted post-extraction in H (0.30 ± 0.80), PMR (0.50 ± 0.69) (p < 0.001*). HR showed a statistically significant drop after H, PMR application. (p < 0.001*) No significant difference in SPO(2) was noted in the three groups (p > 0.05). Pain control was well achieved using H (85%), PMR (70%); BP was well-regulated in the H, PMR compared to C group (p < 0.001*). Need for analgesics was reduced in H (45%), PMR (50%) versus C (100%). Both techniques H, PMR were comparable in all measures. CONCLUSION: Hypnosis and PMR are effective techniques for anxiolysis and pain control in paediatric dental patients.