Cargando…

QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets

BACKGROUND: In economic evaluations, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) can serve as a unit of measurement for disease burden. Obtaining QALY values for COVID-19 presents a challenge owing to the availability of two US EQ-5D-5L value sets and the potentially asymptomatic presentation of the disease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poteet, Stephen, Craig, Benjamin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z
_version_ 1783672476488695808
author Poteet, Stephen
Craig, Benjamin M.
author_facet Poteet, Stephen
Craig, Benjamin M.
author_sort Poteet, Stephen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In economic evaluations, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) can serve as a unit of measurement for disease burden. Obtaining QALY values for COVID-19 presents a challenge owing to the availability of two US EQ-5D-5L value sets and the potentially asymptomatic presentation of the disease. The first value set was completed allowing for the discounting of future health outcomes while the second value set is undiscounted. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the distribution of QALY values using a national survey and the two published value sets; and to estimate the association between COVID-19 outcomes and QALY losses. METHODS: Between 9 and 11 November, 2020, 1153 US adults completed the EQ-5D-5L instrument (five items and a visual analog scale) as well as self-reported their demographics, COVID-19 symptoms, and memberships to populations that are at risk of COVID-19 infection. The two US value sets were applied to the EQ-5D-5L responses to produce QALY values. We estimated the mean QALYs by visual analog scale decile and a generalized linear model of COVID-19 outcomes. RESULTS: The discounted values are higher than the undiscounted values for each visual analog scale decile owing to methodological differences. Persons at increased risk, with a fever in the past day, and with one or more other symptoms have significantly greater QALY losses (p < 0.01). Overall, non-institutionalized individuals at risk of symptomatic clinical COVID-19 equal 0.68 for the 2016 value set (95% confidence interval 0.49–0.87) and 0.10 for the 2017 value set (95% confidence interval − 0.31 to 0.51) QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple studies have shown that decision makers discount future health outcomes, which increase QALY values. This study confronts the practical implications of these methodological advances for use in COVID-19 economic evaluations. Health economists will be able to use the QALY values in this study to better evaluate health interventions against COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8007385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80073852021-03-30 QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets Poteet, Stephen Craig, Benjamin M. Patient Original Research Article BACKGROUND: In economic evaluations, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) can serve as a unit of measurement for disease burden. Obtaining QALY values for COVID-19 presents a challenge owing to the availability of two US EQ-5D-5L value sets and the potentially asymptomatic presentation of the disease. The first value set was completed allowing for the discounting of future health outcomes while the second value set is undiscounted. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the distribution of QALY values using a national survey and the two published value sets; and to estimate the association between COVID-19 outcomes and QALY losses. METHODS: Between 9 and 11 November, 2020, 1153 US adults completed the EQ-5D-5L instrument (five items and a visual analog scale) as well as self-reported their demographics, COVID-19 symptoms, and memberships to populations that are at risk of COVID-19 infection. The two US value sets were applied to the EQ-5D-5L responses to produce QALY values. We estimated the mean QALYs by visual analog scale decile and a generalized linear model of COVID-19 outcomes. RESULTS: The discounted values are higher than the undiscounted values for each visual analog scale decile owing to methodological differences. Persons at increased risk, with a fever in the past day, and with one or more other symptoms have significantly greater QALY losses (p < 0.01). Overall, non-institutionalized individuals at risk of symptomatic clinical COVID-19 equal 0.68 for the 2016 value set (95% confidence interval 0.49–0.87) and 0.10 for the 2017 value set (95% confidence interval − 0.31 to 0.51) QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple studies have shown that decision makers discount future health outcomes, which increase QALY values. This study confronts the practical implications of these methodological advances for use in COVID-19 economic evaluations. Health economists will be able to use the QALY values in this study to better evaluate health interventions against COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8007385/ /pubmed/33782840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Poteet, Stephen
Craig, Benjamin M.
QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets
title QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets
title_full QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets
title_fullStr QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets
title_full_unstemmed QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets
title_short QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets
title_sort qalys for covid-19: a comparison of us eq-5d-5l value sets
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z
work_keys_str_mv AT poteetstephen qalysforcovid19acomparisonofuseq5d5lvaluesets
AT craigbenjaminm qalysforcovid19acomparisonofuseq5d5lvaluesets