Cargando…
QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets
BACKGROUND: In economic evaluations, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) can serve as a unit of measurement for disease burden. Obtaining QALY values for COVID-19 presents a challenge owing to the availability of two US EQ-5D-5L value sets and the potentially asymptomatic presentation of the disease...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z |
_version_ | 1783672476488695808 |
---|---|
author | Poteet, Stephen Craig, Benjamin M. |
author_facet | Poteet, Stephen Craig, Benjamin M. |
author_sort | Poteet, Stephen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In economic evaluations, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) can serve as a unit of measurement for disease burden. Obtaining QALY values for COVID-19 presents a challenge owing to the availability of two US EQ-5D-5L value sets and the potentially asymptomatic presentation of the disease. The first value set was completed allowing for the discounting of future health outcomes while the second value set is undiscounted. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the distribution of QALY values using a national survey and the two published value sets; and to estimate the association between COVID-19 outcomes and QALY losses. METHODS: Between 9 and 11 November, 2020, 1153 US adults completed the EQ-5D-5L instrument (five items and a visual analog scale) as well as self-reported their demographics, COVID-19 symptoms, and memberships to populations that are at risk of COVID-19 infection. The two US value sets were applied to the EQ-5D-5L responses to produce QALY values. We estimated the mean QALYs by visual analog scale decile and a generalized linear model of COVID-19 outcomes. RESULTS: The discounted values are higher than the undiscounted values for each visual analog scale decile owing to methodological differences. Persons at increased risk, with a fever in the past day, and with one or more other symptoms have significantly greater QALY losses (p < 0.01). Overall, non-institutionalized individuals at risk of symptomatic clinical COVID-19 equal 0.68 for the 2016 value set (95% confidence interval 0.49–0.87) and 0.10 for the 2017 value set (95% confidence interval − 0.31 to 0.51) QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple studies have shown that decision makers discount future health outcomes, which increase QALY values. This study confronts the practical implications of these methodological advances for use in COVID-19 economic evaluations. Health economists will be able to use the QALY values in this study to better evaluate health interventions against COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8007385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80073852021-03-30 QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets Poteet, Stephen Craig, Benjamin M. Patient Original Research Article BACKGROUND: In economic evaluations, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) can serve as a unit of measurement for disease burden. Obtaining QALY values for COVID-19 presents a challenge owing to the availability of two US EQ-5D-5L value sets and the potentially asymptomatic presentation of the disease. The first value set was completed allowing for the discounting of future health outcomes while the second value set is undiscounted. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the distribution of QALY values using a national survey and the two published value sets; and to estimate the association between COVID-19 outcomes and QALY losses. METHODS: Between 9 and 11 November, 2020, 1153 US adults completed the EQ-5D-5L instrument (five items and a visual analog scale) as well as self-reported their demographics, COVID-19 symptoms, and memberships to populations that are at risk of COVID-19 infection. The two US value sets were applied to the EQ-5D-5L responses to produce QALY values. We estimated the mean QALYs by visual analog scale decile and a generalized linear model of COVID-19 outcomes. RESULTS: The discounted values are higher than the undiscounted values for each visual analog scale decile owing to methodological differences. Persons at increased risk, with a fever in the past day, and with one or more other symptoms have significantly greater QALY losses (p < 0.01). Overall, non-institutionalized individuals at risk of symptomatic clinical COVID-19 equal 0.68 for the 2016 value set (95% confidence interval 0.49–0.87) and 0.10 for the 2017 value set (95% confidence interval − 0.31 to 0.51) QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple studies have shown that decision makers discount future health outcomes, which increase QALY values. This study confronts the practical implications of these methodological advances for use in COVID-19 economic evaluations. Health economists will be able to use the QALY values in this study to better evaluate health interventions against COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8007385/ /pubmed/33782840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Poteet, Stephen Craig, Benjamin M. QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets |
title | QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets |
title_full | QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets |
title_fullStr | QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets |
title_full_unstemmed | QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets |
title_short | QALYs for COVID-19: A Comparison of US EQ-5D-5L Value Sets |
title_sort | qalys for covid-19: a comparison of us eq-5d-5l value sets |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00509-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poteetstephen qalysforcovid19acomparisonofuseq5d5lvaluesets AT craigbenjaminm qalysforcovid19acomparisonofuseq5d5lvaluesets |