Cargando…
Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors often suffer from cognitive, physical and mental impairments, known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). ICU follow-up clinics may improve aftercare of these patients. There is a lack of evidence whether or which concept of an ICU follow-up clinic i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00796-1 |
_version_ | 1783672492033835008 |
---|---|
author | Rohr, M. Brandstetter, S. Bernardi, C. Fisser, C. Drewitz, K. P. Brunnthaler, V. Schmidt, K. Malfertheiner, M. V. Apfelbacher, C. J. |
author_facet | Rohr, M. Brandstetter, S. Bernardi, C. Fisser, C. Drewitz, K. P. Brunnthaler, V. Schmidt, K. Malfertheiner, M. V. Apfelbacher, C. J. |
author_sort | Rohr, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors often suffer from cognitive, physical and mental impairments, known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). ICU follow-up clinics may improve aftercare of these patients. There is a lack of evidence whether or which concept of an ICU follow-up clinic is effective. Within the PINA study, a concept for an ICU follow-up clinic was developed and will be tested in a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT), primarily to evaluate the feasibility and additionally the potential efficacy. METHODS/DESIGN: Design: Pilot RCT with intervention and control (usual care) arms plus mixed-methods process evaluation. Participants: 100 ICU patients (50 per arm) of three ICUs in a university hospital (Regensburg, Germany), ≥ 18 years with an ICU stay of > 5 days, a sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score > 5 during the ICU stay and a life expectancy of more than 6 months. Intervention: The intervention will contain three components: information, consultation and networking. Information will be available in form of an intensive care guide for patients and next of kin at the ICU and phone support during follow-up. For consultation, patients will visit the ICU follow-up clinic at least once during the first 6 months after discharge from ICU. During these visits, patients will be screened for symptoms of PICS and, if required, referred to specialists for further treatment. The networking part (e.g. special referral letter from the ICU follow-up clinic) aims to provide a network of outpatient care providers for former ICU patients. Feasibility Outcomes: Qualitative and quantitative evaluation will be used to explore reasons for non-participation and the intervention´s acceptability to patients and caregivers. Efficacy Outcomes: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) will be assessed as primary outcome by the physical component score (PCS) of the Short-Form 12 Questionnaire (SF-12). Secondary outcomes encompass further patient-reported outcomes. All outcomes are assessed at 6 months after discharge from ICU. DISCUSSION: The PINA study will determine feasibility and potential efficacy of a complex intervention in a pilot RCT to enhance follow-up care of ICU survivors. The pilot study is an important step for further studies in the field of ICU aftercare and especially for the implementation of a pragmatic multi-centre RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04186468. Submitted 2 December 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00796-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8007452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80074522021-03-30 Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial Rohr, M. Brandstetter, S. Bernardi, C. Fisser, C. Drewitz, K. P. Brunnthaler, V. Schmidt, K. Malfertheiner, M. V. Apfelbacher, C. J. Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors often suffer from cognitive, physical and mental impairments, known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). ICU follow-up clinics may improve aftercare of these patients. There is a lack of evidence whether or which concept of an ICU follow-up clinic is effective. Within the PINA study, a concept for an ICU follow-up clinic was developed and will be tested in a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT), primarily to evaluate the feasibility and additionally the potential efficacy. METHODS/DESIGN: Design: Pilot RCT with intervention and control (usual care) arms plus mixed-methods process evaluation. Participants: 100 ICU patients (50 per arm) of three ICUs in a university hospital (Regensburg, Germany), ≥ 18 years with an ICU stay of > 5 days, a sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score > 5 during the ICU stay and a life expectancy of more than 6 months. Intervention: The intervention will contain three components: information, consultation and networking. Information will be available in form of an intensive care guide for patients and next of kin at the ICU and phone support during follow-up. For consultation, patients will visit the ICU follow-up clinic at least once during the first 6 months after discharge from ICU. During these visits, patients will be screened for symptoms of PICS and, if required, referred to specialists for further treatment. The networking part (e.g. special referral letter from the ICU follow-up clinic) aims to provide a network of outpatient care providers for former ICU patients. Feasibility Outcomes: Qualitative and quantitative evaluation will be used to explore reasons for non-participation and the intervention´s acceptability to patients and caregivers. Efficacy Outcomes: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) will be assessed as primary outcome by the physical component score (PCS) of the Short-Form 12 Questionnaire (SF-12). Secondary outcomes encompass further patient-reported outcomes. All outcomes are assessed at 6 months after discharge from ICU. DISCUSSION: The PINA study will determine feasibility and potential efficacy of a complex intervention in a pilot RCT to enhance follow-up care of ICU survivors. The pilot study is an important step for further studies in the field of ICU aftercare and especially for the implementation of a pragmatic multi-centre RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04186468. Submitted 2 December 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00796-1. BioMed Central 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8007452/ /pubmed/33785064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00796-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Rohr, M. Brandstetter, S. Bernardi, C. Fisser, C. Drewitz, K. P. Brunnthaler, V. Schmidt, K. Malfertheiner, M. V. Apfelbacher, C. J. Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title | Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | piloting an icu follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in icu survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (pina): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00796-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rohrm pilotinganicufollowupclinictoimprovehealthrelatedqualityoflifeinicusurvivorsafteraprolongedintensivecarestaypinastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brandstetters pilotinganicufollowupclinictoimprovehealthrelatedqualityoflifeinicusurvivorsafteraprolongedintensivecarestaypinastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bernardic pilotinganicufollowupclinictoimprovehealthrelatedqualityoflifeinicusurvivorsafteraprolongedintensivecarestaypinastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fisserc pilotinganicufollowupclinictoimprovehealthrelatedqualityoflifeinicusurvivorsafteraprolongedintensivecarestaypinastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT drewitzkp pilotinganicufollowupclinictoimprovehealthrelatedqualityoflifeinicusurvivorsafteraprolongedintensivecarestaypinastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brunnthalerv pilotinganicufollowupclinictoimprovehealthrelatedqualityoflifeinicusurvivorsafteraprolongedintensivecarestaypinastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schmidtk pilotinganicufollowupclinictoimprovehealthrelatedqualityoflifeinicusurvivorsafteraprolongedintensivecarestaypinastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT malfertheinermv pilotinganicufollowupclinictoimprovehealthrelatedqualityoflifeinicusurvivorsafteraprolongedintensivecarestaypinastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT apfelbachercj pilotinganicufollowupclinictoimprovehealthrelatedqualityoflifeinicusurvivorsafteraprolongedintensivecarestaypinastudyprotocolforapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial |