Cargando…
Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits
Examining personality traits as predictors of human behaviour is of high interest. There are several but inconclusive reported relationships of personality and the susceptibility to the “anchoring effect”, a tendency to adjust estimates towards a given anchor. To provide an answer to variably report...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86429-2 |
_version_ | 1783672522581999616 |
---|---|
author | Schindler, Sebastian Querengässer, Jan Bruchmann, Maximilian Bögemann, Nele Johanna Moeck, Robert Straube, Thomas |
author_facet | Schindler, Sebastian Querengässer, Jan Bruchmann, Maximilian Bögemann, Nele Johanna Moeck, Robert Straube, Thomas |
author_sort | Schindler, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Examining personality traits as predictors of human behaviour is of high interest. There are several but inconclusive reported relationships of personality and the susceptibility to the “anchoring effect”, a tendency to adjust estimates towards a given anchor. To provide an answer to variably reported links between personality traits and the anchoring effect, we collected data from 1000 participants in the lab and validated typical anchoring effects and representative personality scores of the sample. Using Bayesian statistical data analyses, we found evidence for the absence of a relationship between anchoring effects and personality scores. We, therefore, conclude that there are no specific personality traits that relate to a higher susceptibility to the anchoring effect. The lack of a relationship between personality and the susceptibility to the anchoring effect might be due to the specific anchoring design, be limited to specific cognitive domains, or the susceptibility to anchors might reflect no reliable individual cognitive phenomena. In the next step, studies should examine the reliability of anchoring effects on the individual level, and testing relationships of individual traits and anchoring effects for other types of anchors, anchoring designs, or cognitive domains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8007589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80075892021-03-30 Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits Schindler, Sebastian Querengässer, Jan Bruchmann, Maximilian Bögemann, Nele Johanna Moeck, Robert Straube, Thomas Sci Rep Article Examining personality traits as predictors of human behaviour is of high interest. There are several but inconclusive reported relationships of personality and the susceptibility to the “anchoring effect”, a tendency to adjust estimates towards a given anchor. To provide an answer to variably reported links between personality traits and the anchoring effect, we collected data from 1000 participants in the lab and validated typical anchoring effects and representative personality scores of the sample. Using Bayesian statistical data analyses, we found evidence for the absence of a relationship between anchoring effects and personality scores. We, therefore, conclude that there are no specific personality traits that relate to a higher susceptibility to the anchoring effect. The lack of a relationship between personality and the susceptibility to the anchoring effect might be due to the specific anchoring design, be limited to specific cognitive domains, or the susceptibility to anchors might reflect no reliable individual cognitive phenomena. In the next step, studies should examine the reliability of anchoring effects on the individual level, and testing relationships of individual traits and anchoring effects for other types of anchors, anchoring designs, or cognitive domains. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8007589/ /pubmed/33782455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86429-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Schindler, Sebastian Querengässer, Jan Bruchmann, Maximilian Bögemann, Nele Johanna Moeck, Robert Straube, Thomas Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits |
title | Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits |
title_full | Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits |
title_fullStr | Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits |
title_full_unstemmed | Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits |
title_short | Bayes Factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the Big Five personality traits |
title_sort | bayes factors show evidence against systematic relationships between the anchoring effect and the big five personality traits |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86429-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schindlersebastian bayesfactorsshowevidenceagainstsystematicrelationshipsbetweentheanchoringeffectandthebigfivepersonalitytraits AT querengasserjan bayesfactorsshowevidenceagainstsystematicrelationshipsbetweentheanchoringeffectandthebigfivepersonalitytraits AT bruchmannmaximilian bayesfactorsshowevidenceagainstsystematicrelationshipsbetweentheanchoringeffectandthebigfivepersonalitytraits AT bogemannnelejohanna bayesfactorsshowevidenceagainstsystematicrelationshipsbetweentheanchoringeffectandthebigfivepersonalitytraits AT moeckrobert bayesfactorsshowevidenceagainstsystematicrelationshipsbetweentheanchoringeffectandthebigfivepersonalitytraits AT straubethomas bayesfactorsshowevidenceagainstsystematicrelationshipsbetweentheanchoringeffectandthebigfivepersonalitytraits |