Cargando…

Revisiting single cell analysis in forensic science

Forensic science has yet to take full advantage of single cell analysis. Its greatest benefit is the ability to alleviate the challenges associated with DNA mixture analysis, which remains a significant hurdle in forensic science. Many of the factors that cause complexity in mixture interpretation a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watkins, Davis R. L., Myers, Dan, Xavier, Hannah E., Marciano, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86271-6
_version_ 1783672540672032768
author Watkins, Davis R. L.
Myers, Dan
Xavier, Hannah E.
Marciano, Michael A.
author_facet Watkins, Davis R. L.
Myers, Dan
Xavier, Hannah E.
Marciano, Michael A.
author_sort Watkins, Davis R. L.
collection PubMed
description Forensic science has yet to take full advantage of single cell analysis. Its greatest benefit is the ability to alleviate the challenges associated with DNA mixture analysis, which remains a significant hurdle in forensic science. Many of the factors that cause complexity in mixture interpretation are absent in single cell analyses—multiple contributors, varied levels of contribution, and allele masking. This study revisits single cell analyses in the context of forensic identification, introducing previously unseen depth to the characterization of data generated from single cells using a novel pipeline that includes recovery of single cells using the DEPArray NxT and amplification using the PowerPlex Fusion 6c kit with varied PCR cycles (29, 30, and 31). The resulting allelic signal was assessed using analytical thresholds of 10, 100, and 150RFU. The mean peak heights across the sample sets generally increased as cycle number increased, 75.0 ± 85.3, 147.1 ± 172.6, and 226.1 ± 298.2 RFU, for 29, 30, and 31 cycles, respectively. The average proportion of allele/locus dropout was most significantly impacted by changes in the detection threshold, whereas increases in PCR cycle number had less impact. Overall data quality improved notably when increasing PCR from 29 to 30 cycles, less improvement and more volatility was introduced at 31 cycles. The average random match probabilities for the 29, 30, and 31 cycle sets at 150RFU are 1 in 2.4 × 10(18) ± 1.46 × 10(19), 1 in 1.49 × 10(25) ± 5.8 × 10(25), and 1 in 1.83 × 10(24) ± 8.09 × 10(24), respectively. This demonstrates the current power of single cell analysis in removing the need for complex mixture analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8007698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80076982021-03-30 Revisiting single cell analysis in forensic science Watkins, Davis R. L. Myers, Dan Xavier, Hannah E. Marciano, Michael A. Sci Rep Article Forensic science has yet to take full advantage of single cell analysis. Its greatest benefit is the ability to alleviate the challenges associated with DNA mixture analysis, which remains a significant hurdle in forensic science. Many of the factors that cause complexity in mixture interpretation are absent in single cell analyses—multiple contributors, varied levels of contribution, and allele masking. This study revisits single cell analyses in the context of forensic identification, introducing previously unseen depth to the characterization of data generated from single cells using a novel pipeline that includes recovery of single cells using the DEPArray NxT and amplification using the PowerPlex Fusion 6c kit with varied PCR cycles (29, 30, and 31). The resulting allelic signal was assessed using analytical thresholds of 10, 100, and 150RFU. The mean peak heights across the sample sets generally increased as cycle number increased, 75.0 ± 85.3, 147.1 ± 172.6, and 226.1 ± 298.2 RFU, for 29, 30, and 31 cycles, respectively. The average proportion of allele/locus dropout was most significantly impacted by changes in the detection threshold, whereas increases in PCR cycle number had less impact. Overall data quality improved notably when increasing PCR from 29 to 30 cycles, less improvement and more volatility was introduced at 31 cycles. The average random match probabilities for the 29, 30, and 31 cycle sets at 150RFU are 1 in 2.4 × 10(18) ± 1.46 × 10(19), 1 in 1.49 × 10(25) ± 5.8 × 10(25), and 1 in 1.83 × 10(24) ± 8.09 × 10(24), respectively. This demonstrates the current power of single cell analysis in removing the need for complex mixture analysis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8007698/ /pubmed/33782417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86271-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Watkins, Davis R. L.
Myers, Dan
Xavier, Hannah E.
Marciano, Michael A.
Revisiting single cell analysis in forensic science
title Revisiting single cell analysis in forensic science
title_full Revisiting single cell analysis in forensic science
title_fullStr Revisiting single cell analysis in forensic science
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting single cell analysis in forensic science
title_short Revisiting single cell analysis in forensic science
title_sort revisiting single cell analysis in forensic science
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86271-6
work_keys_str_mv AT watkinsdavisrl revisitingsinglecellanalysisinforensicscience
AT myersdan revisitingsinglecellanalysisinforensicscience
AT xavierhannahe revisitingsinglecellanalysisinforensicscience
AT marcianomichaela revisitingsinglecellanalysisinforensicscience