Cargando…
An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies
The present study evaluates the drilling fluid density of oil fields at enhanced temperatures and pressures. The main objective of this work is to introduce a set of modeling and experimental techniques for forecasting the drilling fluid density via various intelligent models. Three models were asse...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86264-5 |
_version_ | 1783672569574981632 |
---|---|
author | Alizadeh, S. M. Alruyemi, Issam Daneshfar, Reza Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, Mohammad Naseri, Maryam |
author_facet | Alizadeh, S. M. Alruyemi, Issam Daneshfar, Reza Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, Mohammad Naseri, Maryam |
author_sort | Alizadeh, S. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study evaluates the drilling fluid density of oil fields at enhanced temperatures and pressures. The main objective of this work is to introduce a set of modeling and experimental techniques for forecasting the drilling fluid density via various intelligent models. Three models were assessed, including PSO-LSSVM, ICA-LSSVM, and GA-LSSVM. The PSO-LSSVM technique outperformed the other models in light of the smallest deviation factor, reflecting the responses of the largest accuracy. The experimental and modeled regression diagrams of the coefficient of determination (R(2)) were plotted. In the GA-LSSVM approach, R(2) was calculated to be 0.998, 0.996 and 0.996 for the training, testing and validation datasets, respectively. R(2) was obtained to be 0.999, 0.999 and 0.998 for the training, testing and validation datasets, respectively, in the ICA-LSSVM approach. Finally, it was found to be 0.999, 0.999 and 0.999 for the training, testing and validation datasets in the PSO-LSSVM method, respectively. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impacts of several variables. It was observed that the initial density had the largest impact on the drilling fluid density, yielding a 0.98 relevancy factor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8007825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80078252021-04-01 An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies Alizadeh, S. M. Alruyemi, Issam Daneshfar, Reza Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, Mohammad Naseri, Maryam Sci Rep Article The present study evaluates the drilling fluid density of oil fields at enhanced temperatures and pressures. The main objective of this work is to introduce a set of modeling and experimental techniques for forecasting the drilling fluid density via various intelligent models. Three models were assessed, including PSO-LSSVM, ICA-LSSVM, and GA-LSSVM. The PSO-LSSVM technique outperformed the other models in light of the smallest deviation factor, reflecting the responses of the largest accuracy. The experimental and modeled regression diagrams of the coefficient of determination (R(2)) were plotted. In the GA-LSSVM approach, R(2) was calculated to be 0.998, 0.996 and 0.996 for the training, testing and validation datasets, respectively. R(2) was obtained to be 0.999, 0.999 and 0.998 for the training, testing and validation datasets, respectively, in the ICA-LSSVM approach. Finally, it was found to be 0.999, 0.999 and 0.999 for the training, testing and validation datasets in the PSO-LSSVM method, respectively. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impacts of several variables. It was observed that the initial density had the largest impact on the drilling fluid density, yielding a 0.98 relevancy factor. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8007825/ /pubmed/33782471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86264-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Alizadeh, S. M. Alruyemi, Issam Daneshfar, Reza Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, Mohammad Naseri, Maryam An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies |
title | An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies |
title_full | An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies |
title_fullStr | An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies |
title_short | An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies |
title_sort | insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at hpht condition using pso-, ica-, and ga-lssvm strategies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86264-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alizadehsm aninsightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies AT alruyemiissam aninsightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies AT daneshfarreza aninsightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies AT mohammadikhanaposhtanimohammad aninsightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies AT naserimaryam aninsightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies AT alizadehsm insightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies AT alruyemiissam insightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies AT daneshfarreza insightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies AT mohammadikhanaposhtanimohammad insightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies AT naserimaryam insightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies |