Cargando…

An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies

The present study evaluates the drilling fluid density of oil fields at enhanced temperatures and pressures. The main objective of this work is to introduce a set of modeling and experimental techniques for forecasting the drilling fluid density via various intelligent models. Three models were asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alizadeh, S. M., Alruyemi, Issam, Daneshfar, Reza, Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, Mohammad, Naseri, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86264-5
_version_ 1783672569574981632
author Alizadeh, S. M.
Alruyemi, Issam
Daneshfar, Reza
Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, Mohammad
Naseri, Maryam
author_facet Alizadeh, S. M.
Alruyemi, Issam
Daneshfar, Reza
Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, Mohammad
Naseri, Maryam
author_sort Alizadeh, S. M.
collection PubMed
description The present study evaluates the drilling fluid density of oil fields at enhanced temperatures and pressures. The main objective of this work is to introduce a set of modeling and experimental techniques for forecasting the drilling fluid density via various intelligent models. Three models were assessed, including PSO-LSSVM, ICA-LSSVM, and GA-LSSVM. The PSO-LSSVM technique outperformed the other models in light of the smallest deviation factor, reflecting the responses of the largest accuracy. The experimental and modeled regression diagrams of the coefficient of determination (R(2)) were plotted. In the GA-LSSVM approach, R(2) was calculated to be 0.998, 0.996 and 0.996 for the training, testing and validation datasets, respectively. R(2) was obtained to be 0.999, 0.999 and 0.998 for the training, testing and validation datasets, respectively, in the ICA-LSSVM approach. Finally, it was found to be 0.999, 0.999 and 0.999 for the training, testing and validation datasets in the PSO-LSSVM method, respectively. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impacts of several variables. It was observed that the initial density had the largest impact on the drilling fluid density, yielding a 0.98 relevancy factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8007825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80078252021-04-01 An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies Alizadeh, S. M. Alruyemi, Issam Daneshfar, Reza Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, Mohammad Naseri, Maryam Sci Rep Article The present study evaluates the drilling fluid density of oil fields at enhanced temperatures and pressures. The main objective of this work is to introduce a set of modeling and experimental techniques for forecasting the drilling fluid density via various intelligent models. Three models were assessed, including PSO-LSSVM, ICA-LSSVM, and GA-LSSVM. The PSO-LSSVM technique outperformed the other models in light of the smallest deviation factor, reflecting the responses of the largest accuracy. The experimental and modeled regression diagrams of the coefficient of determination (R(2)) were plotted. In the GA-LSSVM approach, R(2) was calculated to be 0.998, 0.996 and 0.996 for the training, testing and validation datasets, respectively. R(2) was obtained to be 0.999, 0.999 and 0.998 for the training, testing and validation datasets, respectively, in the ICA-LSSVM approach. Finally, it was found to be 0.999, 0.999 and 0.999 for the training, testing and validation datasets in the PSO-LSSVM method, respectively. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the impacts of several variables. It was observed that the initial density had the largest impact on the drilling fluid density, yielding a 0.98 relevancy factor. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8007825/ /pubmed/33782471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86264-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Alizadeh, S. M.
Alruyemi, Issam
Daneshfar, Reza
Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, Mohammad
Naseri, Maryam
An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies
title An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies
title_full An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies
title_fullStr An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies
title_full_unstemmed An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies
title_short An insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at HPHT condition using PSO-, ICA-, and GA-LSSVM strategies
title_sort insight into the estimation of drilling fluid density at hpht condition using pso-, ica-, and ga-lssvm strategies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8007825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33782471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86264-5
work_keys_str_mv AT alizadehsm aninsightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies
AT alruyemiissam aninsightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies
AT daneshfarreza aninsightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies
AT mohammadikhanaposhtanimohammad aninsightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies
AT naserimaryam aninsightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies
AT alizadehsm insightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies
AT alruyemiissam insightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies
AT daneshfarreza insightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies
AT mohammadikhanaposhtanimohammad insightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies
AT naserimaryam insightintotheestimationofdrillingfluiddensityathphtconditionusingpsoicaandgalssvmstrategies