Cargando…

A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations

Larger easily visible animals and plants are negatively affected by agrochemicals used for intensive food production, but we do not understand the general spatial and temporal effects of agrochemicals on the multitudes of bacteria, fungi, and small invertebrate animals that underpin ecosystem produc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giraldo-Perez, Paulina, Raw, Victoria, Greven, Marc, Goddard, Matthew R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102280
Descripción
Sumario:Larger easily visible animals and plants are negatively affected by agrochemicals used for intensive food production, but we do not understand the general spatial and temporal effects of agrochemicals on the multitudes of bacteria, fungi, and small invertebrate animals that underpin ecosystem productivity. We sequenced the 16S, ITS2, and COI DNA barcode regions from 648 New Zealand vineyard soil samples managed under either conventional or low-agrochemical-input conservation approaches across two regions and three seasons in 1 year and discovered at least 170,000 phylotypes (taxa) with >97% genetic identity. Management approach correlated with a significant 2%–10% difference in the abundances of phylotypes that differed over regions and seasons. Although the data show that agrochemicals do not have a large effect on soil biodiversity on average, the important finding is that the magnitude of impact differs between taxa types and locations, and some taxa most affected also influence the quality of agricultural produce.