Cargando…
A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations
Larger easily visible animals and plants are negatively affected by agrochemicals used for intensive food production, but we do not understand the general spatial and temporal effects of agrochemicals on the multitudes of bacteria, fungi, and small invertebrate animals that underpin ecosystem produc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102280 |
_version_ | 1783672647669776384 |
---|---|
author | Giraldo-Perez, Paulina Raw, Victoria Greven, Marc Goddard, Matthew R. |
author_facet | Giraldo-Perez, Paulina Raw, Victoria Greven, Marc Goddard, Matthew R. |
author_sort | Giraldo-Perez, Paulina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Larger easily visible animals and plants are negatively affected by agrochemicals used for intensive food production, but we do not understand the general spatial and temporal effects of agrochemicals on the multitudes of bacteria, fungi, and small invertebrate animals that underpin ecosystem productivity. We sequenced the 16S, ITS2, and COI DNA barcode regions from 648 New Zealand vineyard soil samples managed under either conventional or low-agrochemical-input conservation approaches across two regions and three seasons in 1 year and discovered at least 170,000 phylotypes (taxa) with >97% genetic identity. Management approach correlated with a significant 2%–10% difference in the abundances of phylotypes that differed over regions and seasons. Although the data show that agrochemicals do not have a large effect on soil biodiversity on average, the important finding is that the magnitude of impact differs between taxa types and locations, and some taxa most affected also influence the quality of agricultural produce. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8008184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80081842021-04-01 A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations Giraldo-Perez, Paulina Raw, Victoria Greven, Marc Goddard, Matthew R. iScience Article Larger easily visible animals and plants are negatively affected by agrochemicals used for intensive food production, but we do not understand the general spatial and temporal effects of agrochemicals on the multitudes of bacteria, fungi, and small invertebrate animals that underpin ecosystem productivity. We sequenced the 16S, ITS2, and COI DNA barcode regions from 648 New Zealand vineyard soil samples managed under either conventional or low-agrochemical-input conservation approaches across two regions and three seasons in 1 year and discovered at least 170,000 phylotypes (taxa) with >97% genetic identity. Management approach correlated with a significant 2%–10% difference in the abundances of phylotypes that differed over regions and seasons. Although the data show that agrochemicals do not have a large effect on soil biodiversity on average, the important finding is that the magnitude of impact differs between taxa types and locations, and some taxa most affected also influence the quality of agricultural produce. Elsevier 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8008184/ /pubmed/33817583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102280 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Giraldo-Perez, Paulina Raw, Victoria Greven, Marc Goddard, Matthew R. A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations |
title | A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations |
title_full | A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations |
title_fullStr | A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations |
title_full_unstemmed | A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations |
title_short | A small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations |
title_sort | small effect of conservation agriculture on soil biodiversity that differs between biological kingdoms and geographic locations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giraldoperezpaulina asmalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations AT rawvictoria asmalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations AT grevenmarc asmalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations AT goddardmatthewr asmalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations AT giraldoperezpaulina smalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations AT rawvictoria smalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations AT grevenmarc smalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations AT goddardmatthewr smalleffectofconservationagricultureonsoilbiodiversitythatdiffersbetweenbiologicalkingdomsandgeographiclocations |