Cargando…

The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of access to the femoral artery for the purposes of coronary angiography through the measurement of femoral artery distensibility and elasticity on the accessed and non-accessed sides. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Güneşli, Aylin, Acıbuca, Aynur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Exeley Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33791115
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0007
_version_ 1783672649779511296
author Güneşli, Aylin
Acıbuca, Aynur
author_facet Güneşli, Aylin
Acıbuca, Aynur
author_sort Güneşli, Aylin
collection PubMed
description AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of access to the femoral artery for the purposes of coronary angiography through the measurement of femoral artery distensibility and elasticity on the accessed and non-accessed sides. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients who underwent femoral angiography at least 1 year previously. Those whose femoral artery was accessed once formed Group 1 (n = 59), those who were accessed twice formed Group 2 (n = 57), those accessed 3 times formed Group 3 (n = 55), and those with more than 3 accesses, Group 4 (n = 60). The groups were compared in respect of femoral artery elasticity and distensibility in the accessed and non-accessed sides. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was determined in respect of femoral distensibility and elasticity in Group 1 (9.40 ± 0.84 vs 9.48 ± 0.75, p = 0.107 and 0.23 ± 0.03 vs 0.23 ± 0.03, p = 0.433, respectively). However, a significant difference was observed between the two sides in terms of distensibility and elasticity in Group 2 (9.02 ± 0.81 vs 9.23 ± 0.75, and 0.21 ± 0.02 vs 0.22 ± 0.02), in Group 3 (8.49 ± 0.77 vs 9.18 ± 0.9 and 0.19 ± 0.02 vs 0.21 ± 0.02), and in Group 4 (8.14 ± 0.74 vs 9.03 ± 0.81 and 0.16 ± 0.01 vs 0.2 ± 0.02, p <0.001, for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: While a single access in the femoral artery for coronary angiography does not affect femoral artery elasticity and distensibility, multiple accesses may have adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8008193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Exeley Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80081932021-03-30 The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity Güneşli, Aylin Acıbuca, Aynur J Ultrason Medicine AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of access to the femoral artery for the purposes of coronary angiography through the measurement of femoral artery distensibility and elasticity on the accessed and non-accessed sides. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients who underwent femoral angiography at least 1 year previously. Those whose femoral artery was accessed once formed Group 1 (n = 59), those who were accessed twice formed Group 2 (n = 57), those accessed 3 times formed Group 3 (n = 55), and those with more than 3 accesses, Group 4 (n = 60). The groups were compared in respect of femoral artery elasticity and distensibility in the accessed and non-accessed sides. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was determined in respect of femoral distensibility and elasticity in Group 1 (9.40 ± 0.84 vs 9.48 ± 0.75, p = 0.107 and 0.23 ± 0.03 vs 0.23 ± 0.03, p = 0.433, respectively). However, a significant difference was observed between the two sides in terms of distensibility and elasticity in Group 2 (9.02 ± 0.81 vs 9.23 ± 0.75, and 0.21 ± 0.02 vs 0.22 ± 0.02), in Group 3 (8.49 ± 0.77 vs 9.18 ± 0.9 and 0.19 ± 0.02 vs 0.21 ± 0.02), and in Group 4 (8.14 ± 0.74 vs 9.03 ± 0.81 and 0.16 ± 0.01 vs 0.2 ± 0.02, p <0.001, for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: While a single access in the femoral artery for coronary angiography does not affect femoral artery elasticity and distensibility, multiple accesses may have adverse effects. Exeley Inc. 2021 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8008193/ /pubmed/33791115 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0007 Text en © Polish Ultrasound Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/cc-by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/cc-by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND). Reproduction is permitted for personal, educational, non-commercial use, provided that the original article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
spellingShingle Medicine
Güneşli, Aylin
Acıbuca, Aynur
The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity
title The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity
title_full The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity
title_fullStr The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity
title_full_unstemmed The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity
title_short The effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity
title_sort effect of coronary angiography and femoral access on femoral artery distensibility and elasticity
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33791115
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0007
work_keys_str_mv AT gunesliaylin theeffectofcoronaryangiographyandfemoralaccessonfemoralarterydistensibilityandelasticity
AT acıbucaaynur theeffectofcoronaryangiographyandfemoralaccessonfemoralarterydistensibilityandelasticity
AT gunesliaylin effectofcoronaryangiographyandfemoralaccessonfemoralarterydistensibilityandelasticity
AT acıbucaaynur effectofcoronaryangiographyandfemoralaccessonfemoralarterydistensibilityandelasticity