Cargando…
Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals
BACKGROUND: The current study was done to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Vitalograph COPD-6 portable device for detecting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in high-risk individuals in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional descriptive study. Forced...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815540 |
_version_ | 1783672689005690880 |
---|---|
author | Sami, Ramin Omidi, Azam Sadegh, Raheleh |
author_facet | Sami, Ramin Omidi, Azam Sadegh, Raheleh |
author_sort | Sami, Ramin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The current study was done to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Vitalograph COPD-6 portable device for detecting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in high-risk individuals in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional descriptive study. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC using standard spirometer and FEV1, FEV6, and FEV1/FEV6 with COPD- 6 device were measured and recorded. Descriptive analysis was done. RESULTS: 19 of 122 patients (15.6%) were diagnosed with COPD. The COPD-6 had an acceptable performance for detecting COPD as assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (0.72 ; 95% CI: 0.42–0.86), with an average sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 98%, positive predictive value of 89%, and negative predictive value of 97%. The positive likelihood ratio resulted was 42 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.16. CONCLUSION: COPD-6 is a validate and reliable device for detecting COPD in non-specialized health care settings and the best cut-off point for FEV1/FEV6 ratio is 0.72. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8008408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80084082021-04-02 Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals Sami, Ramin Omidi, Azam Sadegh, Raheleh Tanaffos Original Article BACKGROUND: The current study was done to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Vitalograph COPD-6 portable device for detecting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in high-risk individuals in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional descriptive study. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC using standard spirometer and FEV1, FEV6, and FEV1/FEV6 with COPD- 6 device were measured and recorded. Descriptive analysis was done. RESULTS: 19 of 122 patients (15.6%) were diagnosed with COPD. The COPD-6 had an acceptable performance for detecting COPD as assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (0.72 ; 95% CI: 0.42–0.86), with an average sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 98%, positive predictive value of 89%, and negative predictive value of 97%. The positive likelihood ratio resulted was 42 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.16. CONCLUSION: COPD-6 is a validate and reliable device for detecting COPD in non-specialized health care settings and the best cut-off point for FEV1/FEV6 ratio is 0.72. National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8008408/ /pubmed/33815540 Text en Copyright© 2020 National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sami, Ramin Omidi, Azam Sadegh, Raheleh Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals |
title | Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals |
title_full | Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals |
title_fullStr | Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals |
title_short | Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals |
title_sort | validity and reliability of copd-6 device for detecting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in high-risk individuals |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samiramin validityandreliabilityofcopd6devicefordetectingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinhighriskindividuals AT omidiazam validityandreliabilityofcopd6devicefordetectingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinhighriskindividuals AT sadeghraheleh validityandreliabilityofcopd6devicefordetectingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinhighriskindividuals |