Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals

BACKGROUND: The current study was done to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Vitalograph COPD-6 portable device for detecting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in high-risk individuals in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional descriptive study. Forced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sami, Ramin, Omidi, Azam, Sadegh, Raheleh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815540
_version_ 1783672689005690880
author Sami, Ramin
Omidi, Azam
Sadegh, Raheleh
author_facet Sami, Ramin
Omidi, Azam
Sadegh, Raheleh
author_sort Sami, Ramin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current study was done to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Vitalograph COPD-6 portable device for detecting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in high-risk individuals in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional descriptive study. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC using standard spirometer and FEV1, FEV6, and FEV1/FEV6 with COPD- 6 device were measured and recorded. Descriptive analysis was done. RESULTS: 19 of 122 patients (15.6%) were diagnosed with COPD. The COPD-6 had an acceptable performance for detecting COPD as assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (0.72 ; 95% CI: 0.42–0.86), with an average sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 98%, positive predictive value of 89%, and negative predictive value of 97%. The positive likelihood ratio resulted was 42 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.16. CONCLUSION: COPD-6 is a validate and reliable device for detecting COPD in non-specialized health care settings and the best cut-off point for FEV1/FEV6 ratio is 0.72.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8008408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80084082021-04-02 Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals Sami, Ramin Omidi, Azam Sadegh, Raheleh Tanaffos Original Article BACKGROUND: The current study was done to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Vitalograph COPD-6 portable device for detecting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in high-risk individuals in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research was a cross-sectional descriptive study. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC using standard spirometer and FEV1, FEV6, and FEV1/FEV6 with COPD- 6 device were measured and recorded. Descriptive analysis was done. RESULTS: 19 of 122 patients (15.6%) were diagnosed with COPD. The COPD-6 had an acceptable performance for detecting COPD as assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (0.72 ; 95% CI: 0.42–0.86), with an average sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 98%, positive predictive value of 89%, and negative predictive value of 97%. The positive likelihood ratio resulted was 42 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.16. CONCLUSION: COPD-6 is a validate and reliable device for detecting COPD in non-specialized health care settings and the best cut-off point for FEV1/FEV6 ratio is 0.72. National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8008408/ /pubmed/33815540 Text en Copyright© 2020 National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Sami, Ramin
Omidi, Azam
Sadegh, Raheleh
Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals
title Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals
title_full Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals
title_short Validity and Reliability of COPD-6 Device for Detecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in High-Risk Individuals
title_sort validity and reliability of copd-6 device for detecting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in high-risk individuals
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33815540
work_keys_str_mv AT samiramin validityandreliabilityofcopd6devicefordetectingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinhighriskindividuals
AT omidiazam validityandreliabilityofcopd6devicefordetectingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinhighriskindividuals
AT sadeghraheleh validityandreliabilityofcopd6devicefordetectingchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinhighriskindividuals