Cargando…

Sample size and sample composition for constructing growth reference centiles

Growth reference centile charts are widely used in child health to assess weight, height and other age-varying measurements. The centiles are easy to construct from reference data, using the LMS method or GAMLSS (Generalised Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape). However, there is as yet no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cole, TJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33043801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280220958438
_version_ 1783672696406540288
author Cole, TJ
author_facet Cole, TJ
author_sort Cole, TJ
collection PubMed
description Growth reference centile charts are widely used in child health to assess weight, height and other age-varying measurements. The centiles are easy to construct from reference data, using the LMS method or GAMLSS (Generalised Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape). However, there is as yet no clear guidance on how to design such studies, and in particular how many reference data to collect, and this has led to study sizes varying widely. The paper aims to provide a theoretical framework for optimally designing growth reference studies based on cross-sectional data. Centiles for weight, height, body mass index and head circumference, in 6878 boys aged 0–21 years from the Fourth Dutch Growth Study, were fitted using GAMLSS. The effect on precision of varying the sample size and the distribution of measurement ages (sample composition) was explored by fitting a series of GAMLSS models to simulated data. Sample composition was defined as uniform on the age(λ) scale, where λ was chosen to give constant precision across the age range. Precision was measured on the z-score scale, and was the same for all four measurements, with a standard error of 0.041 z-score units for the median and 0.066 for the 2nd and 98th centiles. Compared to a naïve calculation, the process of smoothing the centiles increased the notional sample size two- to threefold by ‘borrowing strength’. The sample composition for estimating the median curve was optimal for λ=0.4, reflecting considerable over-sampling of infants compared to children. However, for the 2nd and 98th centiles, λ=0.75 was optimal, with less infant over-sampling. The conclusion is that both sample size and sample composition need to be optimised. The paper provides practical advice on design, and concludes that optimally designed studies need 7000–25,000 subjects per sex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8008444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80084442021-04-08 Sample size and sample composition for constructing growth reference centiles Cole, TJ Stat Methods Med Res Articles Growth reference centile charts are widely used in child health to assess weight, height and other age-varying measurements. The centiles are easy to construct from reference data, using the LMS method or GAMLSS (Generalised Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape). However, there is as yet no clear guidance on how to design such studies, and in particular how many reference data to collect, and this has led to study sizes varying widely. The paper aims to provide a theoretical framework for optimally designing growth reference studies based on cross-sectional data. Centiles for weight, height, body mass index and head circumference, in 6878 boys aged 0–21 years from the Fourth Dutch Growth Study, were fitted using GAMLSS. The effect on precision of varying the sample size and the distribution of measurement ages (sample composition) was explored by fitting a series of GAMLSS models to simulated data. Sample composition was defined as uniform on the age(λ) scale, where λ was chosen to give constant precision across the age range. Precision was measured on the z-score scale, and was the same for all four measurements, with a standard error of 0.041 z-score units for the median and 0.066 for the 2nd and 98th centiles. Compared to a naïve calculation, the process of smoothing the centiles increased the notional sample size two- to threefold by ‘borrowing strength’. The sample composition for estimating the median curve was optimal for λ=0.4, reflecting considerable over-sampling of infants compared to children. However, for the 2nd and 98th centiles, λ=0.75 was optimal, with less infant over-sampling. The conclusion is that both sample size and sample composition need to be optimised. The paper provides practical advice on design, and concludes that optimally designed studies need 7000–25,000 subjects per sex. SAGE Publications 2020-10-12 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8008444/ /pubmed/33043801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280220958438 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Cole, TJ
Sample size and sample composition for constructing growth reference centiles
title Sample size and sample composition for constructing growth reference centiles
title_full Sample size and sample composition for constructing growth reference centiles
title_fullStr Sample size and sample composition for constructing growth reference centiles
title_full_unstemmed Sample size and sample composition for constructing growth reference centiles
title_short Sample size and sample composition for constructing growth reference centiles
title_sort sample size and sample composition for constructing growth reference centiles
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33043801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280220958438
work_keys_str_mv AT coletj samplesizeandsamplecompositionforconstructinggrowthreferencecentiles