Cargando…

Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial

BACKGROUND: Over the last decades, many high-income countries have successfully implemented assertive outreach mental health services for acute care. Despite evidence that these services entail several benefits for service users, Germany has lagged behind and has been slow in implementing outreach s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumgardt, Johanna, Schwarz, Julian, Bechdolf, Andreas, Nikolaidis, Konstantinos, Heinze, Martin, Hamann, Johannes, Holzke, Martin, Längle, Gerhard, Richter, Janina, Brieger, Peter, Kilian, Reinhold, Timm, Jürgen, Hirschmeier, Constance, Von Peter, Sebastian, Weinmann, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03163-9
_version_ 1783672704738525184
author Baumgardt, Johanna
Schwarz, Julian
Bechdolf, Andreas
Nikolaidis, Konstantinos
Heinze, Martin
Hamann, Johannes
Holzke, Martin
Längle, Gerhard
Richter, Janina
Brieger, Peter
Kilian, Reinhold
Timm, Jürgen
Hirschmeier, Constance
Von Peter, Sebastian
Weinmann, Stefan
author_facet Baumgardt, Johanna
Schwarz, Julian
Bechdolf, Andreas
Nikolaidis, Konstantinos
Heinze, Martin
Hamann, Johannes
Holzke, Martin
Längle, Gerhard
Richter, Janina
Brieger, Peter
Kilian, Reinhold
Timm, Jürgen
Hirschmeier, Constance
Von Peter, Sebastian
Weinmann, Stefan
author_sort Baumgardt, Johanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the last decades, many high-income countries have successfully implemented assertive outreach mental health services for acute care. Despite evidence that these services entail several benefits for service users, Germany has lagged behind and has been slow in implementing outreach services. In 2018, a new law enabled national mental health care providers to implement team-based crisis intervention services on a regular basis, allowing for different forms of Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT). IEHT is similar to the internationally known Home Treatment or Crisis Resolution Teams. It provides acute psychiatric treatment at the user’s home, similar to inpatient hospital treatment in terms of content, flexibility, and complexity. METHODS/DESIGN: The presented naturalistic, quasi-experimental cohort study will evaluate IEHT in ten hospitals running IEHT services in different German regions. Within a multi-method research approach, it will evaluate stakeholders’ experiences of care, service use, efficacy, costs, treatment processes and implementation processes of IEHT from different perspectives. Quantitative surveys will be used to recruit 360 service users. Subsequently, 180 service users receiving IEHT will be compared with 180 matched statistical ‘twins’ receiving standard inpatient treatment. Assessments will take place at baseline as well as after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the hospital re-admission rate within 12 months. Secondary outcomes include the combined readmission rate, total number of inpatient hospital days, treatment discontinuation rate, quality of life, psycho-social functioning, job integration, recovery, satisfaction with care, shared decision-making, and treatment costs. Additionally, the study will assess the burden of care and satisfaction with care among relatives or informal caregivers. A collaborative research team made up of researchers with and without lived experience of mental distress will conduct qualitative investigations with service users, caregivers and IEHT staff teams to explore critical ingredients and interactions between implementation processes, treatment processes, and outcomes from a stakeholder perspective. DISCUSSION: By integrating outcome, process and implementation research as well as different stakeholder perspectives and experiences in one study, this trial captures the various facets of IEHT as a special form of home treatment. Therefore, it allows for an adequate, comprehensive evaluation on different levels of this complex intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registrations: 1) German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS000224769. Registered December 3rd 2020, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do; 2) ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT0474550. Registered February 9th 2021.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8008509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80085092021-03-30 Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial Baumgardt, Johanna Schwarz, Julian Bechdolf, Andreas Nikolaidis, Konstantinos Heinze, Martin Hamann, Johannes Holzke, Martin Längle, Gerhard Richter, Janina Brieger, Peter Kilian, Reinhold Timm, Jürgen Hirschmeier, Constance Von Peter, Sebastian Weinmann, Stefan BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Over the last decades, many high-income countries have successfully implemented assertive outreach mental health services for acute care. Despite evidence that these services entail several benefits for service users, Germany has lagged behind and has been slow in implementing outreach services. In 2018, a new law enabled national mental health care providers to implement team-based crisis intervention services on a regular basis, allowing for different forms of Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT). IEHT is similar to the internationally known Home Treatment or Crisis Resolution Teams. It provides acute psychiatric treatment at the user’s home, similar to inpatient hospital treatment in terms of content, flexibility, and complexity. METHODS/DESIGN: The presented naturalistic, quasi-experimental cohort study will evaluate IEHT in ten hospitals running IEHT services in different German regions. Within a multi-method research approach, it will evaluate stakeholders’ experiences of care, service use, efficacy, costs, treatment processes and implementation processes of IEHT from different perspectives. Quantitative surveys will be used to recruit 360 service users. Subsequently, 180 service users receiving IEHT will be compared with 180 matched statistical ‘twins’ receiving standard inpatient treatment. Assessments will take place at baseline as well as after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the hospital re-admission rate within 12 months. Secondary outcomes include the combined readmission rate, total number of inpatient hospital days, treatment discontinuation rate, quality of life, psycho-social functioning, job integration, recovery, satisfaction with care, shared decision-making, and treatment costs. Additionally, the study will assess the burden of care and satisfaction with care among relatives or informal caregivers. A collaborative research team made up of researchers with and without lived experience of mental distress will conduct qualitative investigations with service users, caregivers and IEHT staff teams to explore critical ingredients and interactions between implementation processes, treatment processes, and outcomes from a stakeholder perspective. DISCUSSION: By integrating outcome, process and implementation research as well as different stakeholder perspectives and experiences in one study, this trial captures the various facets of IEHT as a special form of home treatment. Therefore, it allows for an adequate, comprehensive evaluation on different levels of this complex intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registrations: 1) German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS000224769. Registered December 3rd 2020, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do; 2) ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT0474550. Registered February 9th 2021. BioMed Central 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8008509/ /pubmed/33781237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03163-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Baumgardt, Johanna
Schwarz, Julian
Bechdolf, Andreas
Nikolaidis, Konstantinos
Heinze, Martin
Hamann, Johannes
Holzke, Martin
Längle, Gerhard
Richter, Janina
Brieger, Peter
Kilian, Reinhold
Timm, Jürgen
Hirschmeier, Constance
Von Peter, Sebastian
Weinmann, Stefan
Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial
title Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial
title_full Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial
title_fullStr Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial
title_full_unstemmed Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial
title_short Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial
title_sort implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in german mental health care (aktiv): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03163-9
work_keys_str_mv AT baumgardtjohanna implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT schwarzjulian implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT bechdolfandreas implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT nikolaidiskonstantinos implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT heinzemartin implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT hamannjohannes implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT holzkemartin implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT langlegerhard implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT richterjanina implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT briegerpeter implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT kilianreinhold implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT timmjurgen implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT hirschmeierconstance implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT vonpetersebastian implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial
AT weinmannstefan implementationefficacycostsandprocessesofinpatientequivalenthometreatmentingermanmentalhealthcareaktivprotocolofamixedmethodparticipatoryquasiexperimentaltrial