Cargando…

The trochanteric double contour is a valuable landmark for assessing femoral offset underestimation on standard radiographs: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Inaccurate projection on standard pelvic radiographs leads to the underestimation of femoral offset—a critical determinant of postoperative hip function—during total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating. We noted that the posteromedial facet of the greater trochanter and piriformis fossa fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blümel, Stefan, Stadelmann, Vincent A., Brioschi, Marco, Küffer, Alexander, Leunig, Michael, Rüdiger, Hannes A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04133-8
_version_ 1783672714804854784
author Blümel, Stefan
Stadelmann, Vincent A.
Brioschi, Marco
Küffer, Alexander
Leunig, Michael
Rüdiger, Hannes A.
author_facet Blümel, Stefan
Stadelmann, Vincent A.
Brioschi, Marco
Küffer, Alexander
Leunig, Michael
Rüdiger, Hannes A.
author_sort Blümel, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inaccurate projection on standard pelvic radiographs leads to the underestimation of femoral offset—a critical determinant of postoperative hip function—during total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating. We noted that the posteromedial facet of the greater trochanter and piriformis fossa form a double contour on radiographs, which may be valuable in determining the risk of underestimating femoral offset. We evaluate whether projection errors can be predicted based on the double contour width. METHODS: Plain anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 64 adult hips were evaluated retrospectively. Apparent femoral offset, apparent femoral head diameter and double contour widths were evaluated from the radiographs. X-ray projection errors were estimated by comparison to the true neck length measured on MRIs after calibration to the femoral heads. Multivariate analysis with backward elimination was used to detect associations between the double contour width and radiographic projection errors. Femoral offset underestimation below 10% was considered acceptable for templating. RESULTS: The narrowest width of the double line between the femoral neck and piriformis fossa is significantly associated with projection error. When double line widths exceed 5 mm, the risk of projection error greater than 10% is significantly increased compared to narrower double lines, and the acceptability rate for templating drops below 80% (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The double contour width is a potential landmark for excluding pelvic AP radiographs unsuitable for THA templating due to inaccurate femoral rotation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8008568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80085682021-03-30 The trochanteric double contour is a valuable landmark for assessing femoral offset underestimation on standard radiographs: a retrospective study Blümel, Stefan Stadelmann, Vincent A. Brioschi, Marco Küffer, Alexander Leunig, Michael Rüdiger, Hannes A. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Inaccurate projection on standard pelvic radiographs leads to the underestimation of femoral offset—a critical determinant of postoperative hip function—during total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating. We noted that the posteromedial facet of the greater trochanter and piriformis fossa form a double contour on radiographs, which may be valuable in determining the risk of underestimating femoral offset. We evaluate whether projection errors can be predicted based on the double contour width. METHODS: Plain anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 64 adult hips were evaluated retrospectively. Apparent femoral offset, apparent femoral head diameter and double contour widths were evaluated from the radiographs. X-ray projection errors were estimated by comparison to the true neck length measured on MRIs after calibration to the femoral heads. Multivariate analysis with backward elimination was used to detect associations between the double contour width and radiographic projection errors. Femoral offset underestimation below 10% was considered acceptable for templating. RESULTS: The narrowest width of the double line between the femoral neck and piriformis fossa is significantly associated with projection error. When double line widths exceed 5 mm, the risk of projection error greater than 10% is significantly increased compared to narrower double lines, and the acceptability rate for templating drops below 80% (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The double contour width is a potential landmark for excluding pelvic AP radiographs unsuitable for THA templating due to inaccurate femoral rotation. BioMed Central 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8008568/ /pubmed/33781252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04133-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blümel, Stefan
Stadelmann, Vincent A.
Brioschi, Marco
Küffer, Alexander
Leunig, Michael
Rüdiger, Hannes A.
The trochanteric double contour is a valuable landmark for assessing femoral offset underestimation on standard radiographs: a retrospective study
title The trochanteric double contour is a valuable landmark for assessing femoral offset underestimation on standard radiographs: a retrospective study
title_full The trochanteric double contour is a valuable landmark for assessing femoral offset underestimation on standard radiographs: a retrospective study
title_fullStr The trochanteric double contour is a valuable landmark for assessing femoral offset underestimation on standard radiographs: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed The trochanteric double contour is a valuable landmark for assessing femoral offset underestimation on standard radiographs: a retrospective study
title_short The trochanteric double contour is a valuable landmark for assessing femoral offset underestimation on standard radiographs: a retrospective study
title_sort trochanteric double contour is a valuable landmark for assessing femoral offset underestimation on standard radiographs: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04133-8
work_keys_str_mv AT blumelstefan thetrochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT stadelmannvincenta thetrochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT brioschimarco thetrochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT kufferalexander thetrochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT leunigmichael thetrochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT rudigerhannesa thetrochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT blumelstefan trochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT stadelmannvincenta trochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT brioschimarco trochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT kufferalexander trochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT leunigmichael trochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy
AT rudigerhannesa trochantericdoublecontourisavaluablelandmarkforassessingfemoraloffsetunderestimationonstandardradiographsaretrospectivestudy