Cargando…

Non-energy devices to dissect recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer under video-assisted thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND: Systematic nodal dissection plays a crucial role in improving survival and staging in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients but at the cost of increasing the occurrence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Technology should be improved to protect the recurrent laryngeal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Minhao, Ge, Mingjian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01179-2
_version_ 1783672732188147712
author Yu, Minhao
Ge, Mingjian
author_facet Yu, Minhao
Ge, Mingjian
author_sort Yu, Minhao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systematic nodal dissection plays a crucial role in improving survival and staging in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients but at the cost of increasing the occurrence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Technology should be improved to protect the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) during surgery. METHODS: NSCLC patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) surgical treatment by the same surgeon at our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were included as the research subjects and were divided into an energy-device group and a non-energy-device group. Their procedures included anatomic pulmonary resection, normative N1 dissection, and systemic N2 dissection. RESULTS: The rate of metastatically involved recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes (RLNLNs) was 5.19% (39/752). Dissection device, side of primary, FEV1, operative time and BMI were independent predictors of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (RLNI) (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.576, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.490–8.583, P = 0.004; HR = 0.175, 95% CI: 0.072–0.424, P =  < 0.001; HR = 3.008, 95% CI: 1.30–6.927, P = 0.010; HR = 0.328, 95% CI: 0.136–0.794, P = 0.013; HR = 0.344, 95%CI: 0.147–0.801, P = 0.013, respectively). Patients in the non-energy-device group had significantly less RLNI than the energy-device group (P = 0.016) and nearly half of the non-thermal RLNI recovered in 2 weeks (P = 0.025) whereas most thermal RLNI required 3 months for recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Every station of RLNLN had some degree of cancer metastasis in NSCLC patients and when dissecting RLNLNs, dissection device was an independent and artificially controlled predictor of RLNI. Using a non-energy device is a feasible method to protect the RLN as well as an improved recovery time of RLNI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8008666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80086662021-03-31 Non-energy devices to dissect recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer under video-assisted thoracic surgery Yu, Minhao Ge, Mingjian BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Systematic nodal dissection plays a crucial role in improving survival and staging in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients but at the cost of increasing the occurrence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Technology should be improved to protect the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) during surgery. METHODS: NSCLC patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) surgical treatment by the same surgeon at our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were included as the research subjects and were divided into an energy-device group and a non-energy-device group. Their procedures included anatomic pulmonary resection, normative N1 dissection, and systemic N2 dissection. RESULTS: The rate of metastatically involved recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes (RLNLNs) was 5.19% (39/752). Dissection device, side of primary, FEV1, operative time and BMI were independent predictors of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (RLNI) (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.576, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.490–8.583, P = 0.004; HR = 0.175, 95% CI: 0.072–0.424, P =  < 0.001; HR = 3.008, 95% CI: 1.30–6.927, P = 0.010; HR = 0.328, 95% CI: 0.136–0.794, P = 0.013; HR = 0.344, 95%CI: 0.147–0.801, P = 0.013, respectively). Patients in the non-energy-device group had significantly less RLNI than the energy-device group (P = 0.016) and nearly half of the non-thermal RLNI recovered in 2 weeks (P = 0.025) whereas most thermal RLNI required 3 months for recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Every station of RLNLN had some degree of cancer metastasis in NSCLC patients and when dissecting RLNLNs, dissection device was an independent and artificially controlled predictor of RLNI. Using a non-energy device is a feasible method to protect the RLN as well as an improved recovery time of RLNI. BioMed Central 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8008666/ /pubmed/33785015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01179-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yu, Minhao
Ge, Mingjian
Non-energy devices to dissect recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer under video-assisted thoracic surgery
title Non-energy devices to dissect recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer under video-assisted thoracic surgery
title_full Non-energy devices to dissect recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer under video-assisted thoracic surgery
title_fullStr Non-energy devices to dissect recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer under video-assisted thoracic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Non-energy devices to dissect recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer under video-assisted thoracic surgery
title_short Non-energy devices to dissect recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer under video-assisted thoracic surgery
title_sort non-energy devices to dissect recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer under video-assisted thoracic surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33785015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01179-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yuminhao nonenergydevicestodissectrecurrentlaryngealnervelymphnodesofnonsmallcelllungcancerundervideoassistedthoracicsurgery
AT gemingjian nonenergydevicestodissectrecurrentlaryngealnervelymphnodesofnonsmallcelllungcancerundervideoassistedthoracicsurgery