Cargando…

Evaluation of a ‘drop box’ doorstep assessment service to aid remote assessments for COVID-19 in general practice

COVID-19 is an established threat whose clinical features and epidemiology continues to evolve. In an effort to contain the disease, the National Health Service has adopted a digital first approach in UK general practice resulting in a significant shift away from face-to-face consultations. Conseque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irving, Greg, Lawson, David, Tinsley, Adele, Parr, Helen, Whittaker, Cheryl, Jones, Hayley, Cox, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001081
_version_ 1783672782077296640
author Irving, Greg
Lawson, David
Tinsley, Adele
Parr, Helen
Whittaker, Cheryl
Jones, Hayley
Cox, Stephen
author_facet Irving, Greg
Lawson, David
Tinsley, Adele
Parr, Helen
Whittaker, Cheryl
Jones, Hayley
Cox, Stephen
author_sort Irving, Greg
collection PubMed
description COVID-19 is an established threat whose clinical features and epidemiology continues to evolve. In an effort to contain the disease, the National Health Service has adopted a digital first approach in UK general practice resulting in a significant shift away from face-to-face consultations. Consequently, more consultations are being completed without obtaining objective recording of vital signs and face-to-face examination. Some regions have formed hot hubs to facilitate the review of suspected COVID-19 cases and keep their practice site ‘clean’ including the use of doorstep observations in avoiding the risk of face-to-face examination. To support the safe, effective and efficient remote assessment of suspected and confirmed patients with COVID-19, we established a doorstep assessment service to compliment telephone and video consultations. This allows physiological parameters such as temperature, pulse, blood pressure and oxygen saturation to be obtained to guide further triage. Quality improvement methods were used to integrate and optimise the doorstep assessment and measure the improvements made. The introduction of a doorstep assessment service increased the proportion of assessments for patients with suspected COVID-19 in routine care over weeks. At the same time we were able to dramatically reduce face-to-face assessment over a 6-week period by optimising through a range of measures including the introduction of a digital stethoscope. The majority of patients were managed by their own general practitioner following assessment supporting continuity of care. There were no adverse events during the period of observation; no staff absences related to COVID-19. Quality improvement methods have facilitated the successful integration of doorstep assessments into clinical care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8008913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80089132021-04-01 Evaluation of a ‘drop box’ doorstep assessment service to aid remote assessments for COVID-19 in general practice Irving, Greg Lawson, David Tinsley, Adele Parr, Helen Whittaker, Cheryl Jones, Hayley Cox, Stephen BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report COVID-19 is an established threat whose clinical features and epidemiology continues to evolve. In an effort to contain the disease, the National Health Service has adopted a digital first approach in UK general practice resulting in a significant shift away from face-to-face consultations. Consequently, more consultations are being completed without obtaining objective recording of vital signs and face-to-face examination. Some regions have formed hot hubs to facilitate the review of suspected COVID-19 cases and keep their practice site ‘clean’ including the use of doorstep observations in avoiding the risk of face-to-face examination. To support the safe, effective and efficient remote assessment of suspected and confirmed patients with COVID-19, we established a doorstep assessment service to compliment telephone and video consultations. This allows physiological parameters such as temperature, pulse, blood pressure and oxygen saturation to be obtained to guide further triage. Quality improvement methods were used to integrate and optimise the doorstep assessment and measure the improvements made. The introduction of a doorstep assessment service increased the proportion of assessments for patients with suspected COVID-19 in routine care over weeks. At the same time we were able to dramatically reduce face-to-face assessment over a 6-week period by optimising through a range of measures including the introduction of a digital stethoscope. The majority of patients were managed by their own general practitioner following assessment supporting continuity of care. There were no adverse events during the period of observation; no staff absences related to COVID-19. Quality improvement methods have facilitated the successful integration of doorstep assessments into clinical care. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8008913/ /pubmed/33781992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001081 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Irving, Greg
Lawson, David
Tinsley, Adele
Parr, Helen
Whittaker, Cheryl
Jones, Hayley
Cox, Stephen
Evaluation of a ‘drop box’ doorstep assessment service to aid remote assessments for COVID-19 in general practice
title Evaluation of a ‘drop box’ doorstep assessment service to aid remote assessments for COVID-19 in general practice
title_full Evaluation of a ‘drop box’ doorstep assessment service to aid remote assessments for COVID-19 in general practice
title_fullStr Evaluation of a ‘drop box’ doorstep assessment service to aid remote assessments for COVID-19 in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a ‘drop box’ doorstep assessment service to aid remote assessments for COVID-19 in general practice
title_short Evaluation of a ‘drop box’ doorstep assessment service to aid remote assessments for COVID-19 in general practice
title_sort evaluation of a ‘drop box’ doorstep assessment service to aid remote assessments for covid-19 in general practice
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001081
work_keys_str_mv AT irvinggreg evaluationofadropboxdoorstepassessmentservicetoaidremoteassessmentsforcovid19ingeneralpractice
AT lawsondavid evaluationofadropboxdoorstepassessmentservicetoaidremoteassessmentsforcovid19ingeneralpractice
AT tinsleyadele evaluationofadropboxdoorstepassessmentservicetoaidremoteassessmentsforcovid19ingeneralpractice
AT parrhelen evaluationofadropboxdoorstepassessmentservicetoaidremoteassessmentsforcovid19ingeneralpractice
AT whittakercheryl evaluationofadropboxdoorstepassessmentservicetoaidremoteassessmentsforcovid19ingeneralpractice
AT joneshayley evaluationofadropboxdoorstepassessmentservicetoaidremoteassessmentsforcovid19ingeneralpractice
AT coxstephen evaluationofadropboxdoorstepassessmentservicetoaidremoteassessmentsforcovid19ingeneralpractice